ABSTRACT
Making prenatal and birthing services accessible in rural communities no longer able to support a local full-service hospital and the introduction of managed care cost control has led to consideration of alternative models. One such model, the freestanding birth center located in an isolated rural community, challenges the guidelines of several state and professional organizations directed at assuring adequate emergency response, including cesarean sections. An extensive review of freestanding birth centers and their effect on birth outcomes revealed little outcomes data about birth centers distant from full-service hospitals. Most states have modeled their birth center regulations on recommendations from the National Association of Childbearing Centers, but others, such as New York, have more rigidly defined transport parameters that exclude many rural locations. A consensus panel convened by the New York State Rural Health Council concluded that demonstrations projects featuring a rural birthing center farther than 20 minutes from a full-service hospital and operated within a networked rural health system should be developed. Consumers would need to be fully informed about the implications of their choice of birth services and all qualified providers, including midwives, should be included in a team approach to care giving.
