Aortic root diameter is associated with HLA-B27: identifying the patient with ankylosing spondylitis at risk for aortic valve regurgitation.

To assess the association between the aortic root diameter in HLA-B27 positive (+) and HLA-B27 negative (-) ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients from the CARDAS cohort. The CARDAS study is a cross-sectional study in AS patients between 50 and 75 years who were recruited from a large rheumatology outpatient clinic. Patients underwent cardiovascular screening including echocardiography, with 2D, spectral, and color flow Doppler measurements. The aortic root was measured at sinuses of Valsalva during diastole. The aortic root diameter was adjusted for body surface area (BSA) (aortic root index, cm/m2). 193 Consecutive AS patients were included of whom 158 (82%) were HLA-B27 positive. The aortic root index was significantly higher in HLA-B27 + patients compared to HLA-B27- patients, respectively, 1.76 cm ± 0.21 vs. 1.64 cm ± 0.14, p < 0.001. No difference was seen in the prevalence of aortic valve regurgitation (AVR), p = 0.8. Regression analysis showed a significant association between HLA-B27 and aortic root index corrected for age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors (ß 0.091, 95% CI 0.015-0.168, p = 0.02). Especially, male HLA-B27 + patients had a significantly increased aortic root index compared to male HLA-B27- AS patients, respectively, 1.76 cm (1.63-1.88) and 1.59 cm (1.53-1.68), p < 0.001. We found an increased aortic root index in elderly HLA-B27 + AS patients compared to HLA-B27- AS patients, especially in male patients. No difference was seen in the prevalence of AVR. However, as AVR can be progressive, echocardiographic monitoring in elderly male HLA-B27 + AS might be considered.

The effects of golimumab treatment on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction appears more prevalent in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) blocking therapy, a strong and effective anti-inflammatory drug, on diastolic LV function in AS are unknown. The objective of the study was to find the effects of 1-year treatment with golimumab 50 mg subcutaneously once per month on systolic and diastolic LV dysfunction in AS patients. METHODS: Forty consecutive AS patients were treated with TNF-α blocking therapy for 1 year. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: Diastolic LV function improved after treatment in four out of six (67%) AS patients who completed follow-up (P=0.125), and did not develop or worsen in any of the other patients. Treatment with TNF-α blocking therapy had no effect on systolic LV function. CONCLUSION: These findings give support to the hypothesis that diastolic LV dysfunction improves during treatment with TNF-α blocking therapy.

EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular disease risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory joint disorders: 2015/2016 update.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory joint disorders (IJD) have increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk compared with the general population. In 2009, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) taskforce recommended screening, identification of CVD risk factors and CVD risk management largely based on expert opinion. In view of substantial new evidence, an update was conducted with the aim of producing CVD risk management recommendations for patients with IJD that now incorporates an increasing evidence base. A multidisciplinary steering committee (representing 13 European countries) comprised 26 members including patient representatives, rheumatologists, cardiologists, internists, epidemiologists, a health professional and fellows. Systematic literature searches were performed and evidence was categorised according to standard guidelines. The evidence was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus finding and voting process. Three overarching principles were defined. First, there is a higher risk for CVD in patients with RA, and this may also apply to ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Second, the rheumatologist is responsible for CVD risk management in patients with IJD. Third, the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids should be in accordance with treatment-specific recommendations from EULAR and Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society. Ten recommendations were defined, of which one is new and six were changed compared with the 2009 recommendations. Each designated an appropriate evidence support level. The present update extends on the evidence that CVD risk in the whole spectrum of IJD is increased. This underscores the need for CVD risk management in these patients. These recommendations are defined to provide assistance in CVD risk management in IJD, based on expert opinion and scientific evidence.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic inflammatory joint disorders.

Inflammatory joint disorders (IJD), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (ASp) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), are prevalent conditions worldwide with a considerable burden on healthcare systems. IJD are associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) disease-related morbidity and mortality. In this review, we present an overview of the literature. Standardised mortality ratios are increased in IJD compared with the general population, that is, RA 1.3-2.3, ASp 1.6-1.9 and PsA 0.8-1.6. This premature mortality is mainly caused by atherosclerotic events. In RA, this CV risk is comparable to that in type 2 diabetes. Traditional CV risk factors are more often present and partially a consequence of changes in physical function related to the underlying IJD. Also, chronic systemic inflammation itself is an independent CV risk factor. Optimal control of disease activity with conventional synthetic, targeted synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs decreases this excess risk. High-grade inflammation as well as anti-inflammatory treatment alter traditional CV risk factors, such as lipids. In view of the above-mentioned CV burden in patients with IJD, CV risk management is necessary. Presently, this CV risk management is still lacking in usual care. Patients, general practitioners, cardiologists, internists and rheumatologists need to be aware of the substantially increased CV risk in IJD and should make a combined effort to timely initiate CV risk management in accordance with prevailing guidelines together with optimal control of rheumatic disease activity. CV screening and treatment strategies need to be implemented in usual care.

Study on the protective effect of the KIR3DL1 gene in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an autoimmune disease that mainly affects the sacroiliac joints and the spine of the lower back. The disease is strongly associated with HLA-B27. Additional genes, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and molecular components have been identified to be associated with AS, but the exact mechanism that drives disease development remains poorly understood. The killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) are regulators of cytotoxicity of natural killer cells and T cell subsets and may be relevant in binding to HLA-B27 and the development of AS. We undertook this study to identify possible associations of KIR genotype with susceptibility to AS and disease characteristics including the presence of the HLA-B27 allele, disease severity, and uveitis. METHODS: We performed complete genotyping of the KIR locus in 303 Caucasian AS patients, 119 randomly selected healthy Caucasian controls, and 50 HLA-B27-positive healthy Caucasian controls by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay for detection of gene presence and copy number. RESULTS: We did not observe a significant association of any specific KIR gene or haplotype with susceptibility to AS or any other clinical manifestation. Disease severity, as measured by fulfilling the criteria for treatment with tumor necrosis factor blocking therapy, was linked to a lower number of genes for the functional variant of KIR3DL1 (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Our exploratory study indicates that KIR genes are not a major risk factor for susceptibility to AS. However, the data do suggest a role for KIRs in progression of the disease, whereby KIR3DL1 has a protective effect against the more severe manifestations of AS.

Tumor necrosis factor blocking therapy and congestive heart failure in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disorders: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blocking therapy is an effective treatment for chronic inflammatory arthritis. As circulating TNF might induce or exacerbate the development of congestive heart failure (CHF), several trials have investigated the effect of TNF blocking therapy on CHF. However, due to inefficacy and even a risk of exacerbation of CHF, TNF blocking therapy has since then been contraindicated in patients with advanced CHF, New York Heart Association class III and IV. We review current knowledge on the pathophysiological mechanisms and safety of TNF blocking therapy in chronic inflammatory arthritis patients with regard to CHF. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature published up till December 2013 was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify all studies investigating the effect of TNF blocking therapy on the occurrence and risk of CHF in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). All articles reporting data on the prevalence or incidence of CHF during treatment with TNF blocking therapy in patients with in RA, AS or PsA were included. Also imaging studies and studies with biomarkers, investigating the effect of TNF blocking therapy on cardiac function were included. RESULTS: In total, 54 studies were included. Results from large prospective registries suggest that first, a potentially harmful effect of TNF blocking therapy on the incidence of CHF in older RA patients cannot be excluded and that no harmful effect was observed of TNF blocking therapy in other patients. Second, we found that TNF blocking therapy potentially improves several echocardiographic parameters of cardiac function in RA, AS and PsA, but due to small sample sizes, these results require validation in larger studies. Third, we found improvement in NT-proBNP levels after use of TNF blocking therapy in both RA and AS. CONCLUSION: Based on current literature, in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis and concomitant symptomatic mild-tomoderate CHF (NYHA class I or II), treatment with TNF blocking therapy is not contraindicated. In chronic inflammatory arthritis patients with concomitant symptomatic moderate-to-severe CHF, NYHA class III-IV, treatment with TNF blocking therapy should be avoided if possible. Whenever, treatment with TNF-blocking therapy is considered in these patients consultation with a cardiologist is recommended before treatment is initiated.