Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mil Med ; 181(8): 895-9, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27483530

ABSTRACT

Severely injured patients have difficulty recalling their intensive care unit (ICU) experience which may contribute to emotional trauma. An ICU patient journal contains a short summary of key events during the ICU stay, and has been shown to improve emotional well-being. This project evaluated the feasibility and perceptions of ICU journals in a combat ICU. A one-page survey was distributed to ICU nursing staff at Craig Joint Theater Hospital before and after the use of ICU journals as a process improvement initiative. 16 preimplementation and 10 postimplementation surveys were collected to determine the perception of the utility and feasibility of ICU journals, as well as changes to nursing job satisfaction. Overall, nurses had positive perceptions of ICU journaling; after implementation they felt it could also benefit nurses (31% vs. 80%, p = 0.002). ICU nurses that used journals were also more likely to feel their work makes a difference (90%, p = 0.012) and they could connect with their patient on a personal level (50%, p = 0.037). Primary barriers were time to journal and legal concerns. This study demonstrates with the right guidance, ICU journals can be incorporated into an ICU in a deployed environment and nursing staff feel they benefit the patient, family, unit, and staff.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness/psychology , Intensive Care Units/trends , Medical Records/standards , Memory , Perception , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Critical Illness/therapy , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Warfare , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Wounds and Injuries/psychology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
2.
Mil Med ; 181(3): 209-12, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26926744

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a fluctuating disturbance in consciousness associated with increased mortality. Injured warriors represent a unique unstudied population. We hypothesized delirium is common because of high injury severity scores and multidrug sedation regimens. METHODS: Mandatory delirium screening using the confusion assessment method (CAM) was initiated at Craig Joint Theater Hospital in Bagram, Afghanistan. Data were collected in July to August 2012 from the first 50 English-speaking trauma patients with CAM for the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) scores. RESULTS: Patients were male with mean age of 27.8 years; 88% of them were U.S. military personnel. Injury mechanisms were blast (68%) and gunshot (26%). Mean injury severity score was 20. Average ICU length of stay was 2.3 days; 64% were ventilated (for mean 1.2 days). Average time from arrival to CAM assessment was 7 hours, and 26 hours from the time of injury. Of patients, 44% were delirious, 36% at first CAM assessment. Fentanyl (62%) and ketamine (16%) were used for pain control (62%) and propofol for sedation (52%). There was no relationship between delirium and mechanism (p = 0.5) or ketamine on first ICU day (p = 0.2262). Delirium increased with vent days (p < .0001) and was associated with admission and mechanical ventilation (p = 0.0025). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a high rate of delirium in this unique population.


Subject(s)
Blast Injuries/therapy , Delirium/epidemiology , Military Personnel , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , War-Related Injuries/therapy , Adult , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Afghanistan , Blast Injuries/surgery , Critical Care , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/drug therapy , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Intensive Care Units , Male , Nursing Assessment , Prevalence , United States , War-Related Injuries/surgery , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...