Economic case for intraoperative interventions to prevent surgical-site infection.

BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infection (SSI) occurs in 1-10 per cent of all patients undergoing surgery; rates can be higher depending on the type of surgery. The aim of this review was to establish whether (or not) surgical hand asepsis, intraoperative skin antisepsis and selected surgical dressings are cost-effective in SSI prevention, and to examine the quality of reporting. METHODS: The authors searched MEDLINE via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Central and Scopus databases systematically from 1990 to 2016. Included were RCTs and quasi-experimental studies published in English, evaluating the economic impact of interventions to prevent SSI relative to surgical hand and skin antisepsis, and wound dressings. Characteristics and results of included studies were extracted using a standard data collection tool. Study and reporting quality were assessed using SIGN and CHEERS checklists. RESULTS: Across the three areas of SSI prevention, the combined searches identified 1214 articles. Of these, five health economic studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of selected surgical dressings were eligible. Study authors concluded that the interventions being assessed were cost-effective, or were potentially cost-saving. Still, there is high uncertainty around the decision to adopt these dressings/devices in practice. The studies' reporting quality was reasonable; three reported at least 15 of the 24 CHEERS items appropriately. Assessment of methodological quality found that two studies were considered to be of high quality. CONCLUSION: With few economic studies undertaken in this area, the cost-effectiveness of these strategies is unclear. Incorporating economic evaluations alongside RCTs will help towards evidence-informed decisions.

Enhydrina schistosa (Elapidae: Hydrophiinae) the most dangerous sea snake in Sri Lanka: three case studies of severe envenoming.

Sea snakes are highly venomous and inhabit tropical waters of the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Enhydrina schistosa is a common species of sea snake that lives in the coastal waters, lagoons, river mouths and estuaries from the Persian Gulf through Sri Lanka and to Southeast Asia. It is considered one of the most aggressive sea snakes in Sri Lanka where fishermen and people wading are at high risk. However, sea snake bites are rarely reported. In this report, we describe three cases where E. schistosa was the offending species. These three patients presented to two hospitals on the west coast of Sri Lanka within the course of 14 months from November 2011 with different degrees of severity of envenoming. The first patient was a 26-year-old fisherman who developed severe myalgia with very high creatine kinase (CK) levels lasting longer than 7 days. The second patient was a 32-year-old fisherman who developed gross myoglobinuria, high CK levels and hyperkalaemia. Both patients recovered and their electromyographic recordings showed myopathic features. The nerve conduction and neuromuscular transmission studies were normal in both patients suggesting primary myotoxic envenoming. The third patient was a 41-year-old man who trod on a sea snake in a river mouth and developed severe myalgia seven hours later. He had severe rhabdomyolysis and died three days later due to cardiovascular collapse. In conclusion, we confirm that E. schistosa is a deadly sea snake and its bite causes severe rhabdomyolysis.

Oral dabigatran etexilate vs. subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: the RE-MODEL randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulants, such as dabigatran etexilate, an oral, direct thrombin inhibitor, that do not require monitoring or dose adjustment offer potential for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee replacement surgery. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 2076 patients undergoing total knee replacement received dabigatran etexilate, 150 mg or 220 mg once-daily, starting with a half-dose 1-4 hours after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once-daily, starting the evening before surgery, for 6-10 days. Patients were followed-up for 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of total VTE (venographic or symptomatic) and mortality during treatment, and the primary safety outcome was the incidence of bleeding events. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 37.7% (193 of 512) of the enoxaparin group versus 36.4% (183 of 503) of the dabigatran etexilate 220 mg group (absolute difference, -1.3%; 95% CI, -7.3 to 4.6) and 40.5% (213 of 526) of the 150 mg group (2.8%; 95% CI, -3.1 to 8.7). Both doses were noninferior to enoxaparin based on the pre-specified noninferiority criterion. The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the three groups (1.3% versus 1.5% and 1.3% respectively). No significant differences in the incidences of liver enzyme elevation and acute coronary events were observed during treatment or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran etexilate (220 mg or 150 mg) was at least as effective and with a similar safety profile as enoxaparin for prevention of VTE after total knee-replacement surgery.

A new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, compared with enoxaparin for prevention of thromboembolic events following total hip or knee replacement: the BISTRO II randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor undergoing evaluation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following orthopedic surgery. METHODS: In a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind study, 1973 patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement were randomized to 6-10 days of oral dabigatran etexilate (50, 150 mg twice daily, 300 mg once daily, 225 mg twice daily), starting 1-4 h after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) starting 12 h prior to surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of VTE (detected by bilateral venography or symptomatic events) during treatment. RESULTS: Of the 1949 treated patients, 1464 (75%) patients were evaluable for the efficacy analysis. VTE occurred in 28.5%, 17.4%, 16.6%, 13.1% and 24% of patients assigned to dabigatran etexilate 50, 150 mg twice daily, 300 mg once daily, 225 mg twice daily and enoxaparin, respectively. A significant dose-dependent decrease in VTE occurred with increasing doses of dabigatran etexilate (P < 0.0001). Compared with enoxaparin, VTE was significantly lower in patients receiving 150 mg twice daily [odds ratio (OR) 0.65, P = 0.04], 300 mg once daily (OR 0.61, P = 0.02) and 225 mg twice daily (OR 0.47, P = 0.0007). Compared with enoxaparin, major bleeding was significantly lower with 50 mg twice daily (0.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.047) but elevated with higher doses, nearly reaching statistical significance with the 300 mg once-daily dose (4.7%, P = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of dabigatran etexilate, commenced early in the postoperative period, was effective and safe across a range of doses. Further optimization of the efficacy/safety balance will be addressed in future studies.

The effects of unfractionated heparin on survival in patients with malignancy--a systematic review.

Clinical and experimental studies have suggested that unfractionated heparin (UFH) effects malignancy progression. We reviewed all published clinical reports concerning the effects of UFH, as compared to no treatment on survival of cancer patients. Studies were classified on methodological strength and subdivided as to whether therapeutic or prophylactic dosages of UFH were used. Mortality rates after 3 years were extracted or calculated. One randomized study that evaluated the use of UFH in therapeutic dosages in patients with small cell lung carcinoma reported on an improved survival (odds ratio (OR) 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25 to 1.62). A detrimental effect was observed in 2 randomized studies which investigated the effects of intraportal UFH treatment in a prophylactic dose after surgery for gastrointestinal cancer (OR 1.66; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.71). In contrast, level 2 studies in which either therapeutic or prophylactic dosages of UFH on mortality of patients with gastrointestinal cancer were evaluated, showed OR of 0.58 (95% CI; 0.11-3.13) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.84), respectively. We conclude that there is no convincing evidence of either positively or negatively effects of UFH on survival of patients with malignancy.

Antithrombotic drugs in the primary medical management of intermittent claudication: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the efficacy of the antithrombotic drugs available for patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS: A Medline and manual search was used to identify relevant publications. Uncontrolled or retrospective studies, double reports or trials without clinical outcomes were excluded. Included studies were graded as level 1 (randomised and double- or assessor-blind), level 2 (open randomised), or level 3 (non-randomised comparative). Mortality, cerebro- or cardiovascular events, amputations, arterial occlusions or number of revascularization procedures performed in the lower limbs, pain-free and total walking distance, ankle brachial index and calf blood flow, were the main outcomes considered. When feasible, end of treatment results, either continuous or binary, were combined with appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: Mortality was significantly decreased by ticlopidine compared to placebo (common odds ratio 0.68, 95% C.I., 0.49 - 0.95); clopidogrel decreased vascular events in comparison to aspirin (odds ratio 0.76, 95% C.I., 0.63 - 0.92) in level 1 studies. Arterial occlusions and the number of revascularization procedures performed were statistically significantly decreased by aspirin and ticlopidine, respectively. A small but statistically significant improvement in pain-free walking distance was determined by picotamide, indobufen, low molecular weight heparins, sulodexide and defibrotide, in small studies. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel and ticlopidine do reduce clinically important events in patients with intermittent claudication and could be added to the primary medical treatment of these patients. The use of aspirin in these patients cannot be based on direct evidence, but only on analogy with coronary and cerebral atherosclerosis, where it has documented efficacy. Other antithrombotic drugs were not properly evaluated in patients with intermittent claudication.

Treatment of intermittent claudication with physical training, smoking cessation, pentoxifylline, or nafronyl: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the efficacy of physical training, smoking cessation, and pharmacological therapy (pentoxifylline or nafronyl oxalate) in the treatment of patients with intermittent claudication at Fontaine stage II of disease. METHODS: A MEDLINE and manual search was used to identify relevant publications. Uncontrolled or retrospective studies, double reports, and trials without clinically meaningful outcomes were excluded. Included studies were graded level 1 (randomized and double- or assessor-blind), level 2 (open randomized), or level 3 (nonrandomized). Pain-free and total walking distance were the main outcomes considered; when feasible, end-of-treatment results were combined with appropriate meta-analytical procedures. RESULTS: In 5 level 2 studies, physical training increased pain-free and total walking distance significantly (139.0 m [95% confidence interval {CI}, 31.0 to 246.9 m] and 179.1 m [95% CI, 60.2 to 298.1 m], respectively). In a level 3 study, smoking cessation resulted in a nonsignificant increase in total walking distance of 46.7 m (95% CI, -19.3 to 112.7 m). In 6 level 1 studies, pentoxifylline increased both pain-free and total walking distance by 21.0 m (95% CI, 0.7 to 41.3 m) and 43.8 m (95% CI, 14.1 to 73.6 m), respectively. In 4 level 1 trials, nafronyl significantly increased pain-free walking distance (58.6 m [95% CI, 30.4 to 86.8 m]) and total walking distance (71.2 m [95% CI, 13.3 to 129.0 m]). CONCLUSIONS: Physical training increased pain-free and total walking distance in level 2 studies. Only level 3 studies support the usefulness of smoking cessation. In level 1 studies, pentoxifylline and nafronyl increased pain-free and total walking distance, but the average effects were relatively small.

Low-molecular weight heparins in venous and arterial thrombotic disease.

INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the early 1980's, the use of these compounds has been extensively investigated as a substitute for unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with venous and arterial thrombotic diseases. LMWHs have several advantages as compared to UFH, such as the subcutaneous route of administration, the predictable anticoagulant response and the lack of the need for laboratory monitoring. The present systematic review evaluates randomised clinical trials which investigated the efficacy and safety of LMWH in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, unstable coronary syndromes and ischemic stroke. METHODS: A computerised and manual search was performed to identify all relevant clinical trials. All randomised studies, with an a priori defined study population, clinical outcome measurement and adequate follow-up, were reviewed by two independent assessors. Whenever possible a common effect estimate of the included studies was calculated. RESULTS: Thirteen studies in approximately 4000 patients with acute venous thromboembolism revealed an odds ratio for the 3-month recurrent thromboembolism rate and major bleeding complications during exposure of 0.77 (C.I. 0.57-1.04) and 0.61 (C.I. 0.39-0.95), respectively, in favour of LMWH as compared to UFH. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, one study suggested a reduction in the incidence of reinfarction and cardiac death in LMWH recipients compared to UFH, while a placebo-controlled study revealed no beneficial effect of LMWH on these outcomes. In six studies including over 7000 patients with acute unstable coronary syndromes, there was an odds ratio for recurrent angina, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation and major bleedings of 0.88 (C.I. 0.76-1.01), 0.84 (C.I. 0.69-1.01), 0.83 (C.I. 0.70-0.99), 1.09 (C.I. 0.70-1.70), respectively, in favour of LMWH compared to UFH. The three studies comparing LMWH treatment with placebo in approximately 1000 patients with acute ischemic stroke revealed an odds ratio for the 10-day recurrent stroke, death or disability after 3 months and major bleeding complications of 0.68 (C.I. 0.41-1.13), 0.94 (C.I. 0.78-1.15), 2.92 (C.I. 1.88-4.55), respectively. CONCLUSION: Fixed-dose subcutaneous LMWH appears to be a safe and effective alternative for dose-adjusted intravenous heparin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thrombotic disease as well as in patients with acute unstable coronary syndromes. The effectiveness of LMWH in patients with acute myocardial infarction remains unclear. There seems to be no beneficial effect of LMWH treatment as compared to placebo in patients with acute ischemic stroke, while the risk of major bleeding was clearly increased.

Undiagnosed malignancy in patients with deep vein thrombosis: incidence, risk indicators, and diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The reported incidence of a subsequent diagnosis of malignancy in patients presenting with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) varies from 2-25%. Risk indicators and diagnostic procedures to be performed in these patients are controversial. METHODS: Four hundred consecutive patients with confirmed DVT included in a randomized clinical trial were followed prospectively for 6 months. The incidence of a subsequent diagnosis of malignancy was calculated and compared between patients with unexplained DVT and patients with secondary DVT. Potential risk indicators for subsequent malignant disease were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 400 patients, 70 already had been diagnosed with malignancy; another four patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 326 patients, 10 new malignancies were diagnosed among 137 patients with unexplained DVT (7.3%) and 3 new malignancies were diagnosed in 189 patients with secondary DVT (1.6%). The relative risk was 4.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-16; P=0.009). Age, gender, or location of the DVT had no significant effect on the incidence of diagnosis when adjusted for unexplained DVT. Ten of these 13 patients (77%) had abnormal clinical findings suggestive of malignancy at the time of presentation with DVT. CONCLUSIONS: Unexplained DVT is a significant risk indicator of underlying malignancy. The majority of patients with undiagnosed malignancy have some clinical abnormality suggestive of underlying malignancy at the time of presentation with unexplained DVT. A simple clinical evaluation comprised of medical history, physical examination, routine laboratory tests, and chest X-ray can detect such patients. Extensive screening of all patients presenting with unexplained DVT does not appear to be justified.

Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism.

In this review, we analyze data from randomized trials in which low molecular weight heparin was compared with unfractionated heparin, both to estimate the treatment effect of low molecular weight heparin in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism and to evaluate the effect of the varied proportion of included cancer patients (6% to 22.7%) on the incidence of outcome events (recurrence of venous thromboembolism, bleeding, and mortality) and on the estimated treatment effect. Low molecular weight heparin has been extensively investigated in patients with deep vein thrombosis, but few trials have included patients with pulmonary embolism. The risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.04), major bleeding (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95), and mortality (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.96) was less with low molecular weight heparins compared with unfractionated heparin. The proportion of cancer patients in these studies had a statistically significant effect on the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (P = 0.03) and mortality (P = 0.002), but no influence on the estimated treatment effects of low molecular weight heparins. Low molecular weight heparin is effective and safe in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Newly diagnosed malignancy in patients with venous thromboembolism. Search or wait and see?

The incidence of newly diagnosed malignancy is increased in patients with unexplained venous thromboembolism during the first year after a thromboembolic event in comparison to controls (odds ratio, 3.9-36). Extensive screening with computed tomography, endoscopy and tumor markers can identify most of these undetected malignancies. However, approximately half of these can also be identified based on a simple clinical evaluation. Extensive screening has no demonstrated benefit and might actually cause harm. This consideration, combined with the economical and psychological costs of extensive screening leads to the decision not to use such screening procedures, unless indicated by clinical circumstances. Thus, it is appropriate to maintain a low threshold of suspicion for malignancy when treating patients with unexplained venous thromboembolism and to base the decision to perform additional diagnostic tests on the findings of an initial medical history, physical examination, routine laboratory tests and chest x-ray.