Health-related quality of life and participation after inpatient rehabilitation of sepsis survivors with severe sequelae: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe health-related quality of life and participation after rehabilitation of severely affected sepsis survivors. DESIGN: Cohort study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Patients with severe sequelae after sepsis treated in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation pathway were included. METHODS: Patient characteristics at the time of diagnosis, and the outcome 3 months after discharge from rehabilitation are described. At that time, health-related quality of life, social participation, and the rate of living at home were measured. RESULTS: Of the 498 patients enrolled, 100 severely impaired patients were transferred for a multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach. Fifty-five of them were followed up at 3 months. Descriptive and inference statistics showed that 69% were living at home with or without care. Health-related quality of life and participation scores were 0.64 ± 0.32 for the EQ-5D utility index and 54.98 ± 24.97 for the Reintegration of Normal Living Index. A multivariate regression model explaining health-related quality of life at 3 months included age, lower limb strength, and walking ability during rehabilitation (r2 = 0.5511). Participation at 3 months was explained by age, body mass index, lower limb strength, and duration of tracheal intubation (r2 = 0.6229). CONCLUSION: Patients who have experienced serious sepsis with severe sequelae can achieve a moderate level of quality of life and participation within a multidisciplinary pathway.

Nucleated red blood cells as a prognostic marker for mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) in the peripheral blood of critically ill patients is associated with poor outcome. Evidence regarding the predictive value of NRBCs in patients with SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains elusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive validity of NRBCs in these patients. METHODS: Daily NRBC values of adult patients with SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS were assessed and their predictive validity for mortality was statistically evaluated. A cut-off level based on the patient's maximum NRBC value during ICU stay was calculated and further specified according to Youden's method. Based on this cut-off value, further analyses such as logistic regression models and survival were performed. RESULTS: 413 critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS were analyzed. Patients who did not survive had significantly higher NRBC values during their ICU stay compared to patients who survived (1090/µl [310; 3883] vs. 140/µl [20; 500]; p < 0.0001). Patients with severe ARDS (n = 374) had significantly higher NRBC values during ICU stay compared to patients with moderate ARDS (n = 38) (490/µl [120; 1890] vs. 30/µl [10; 476]; p < 0.0001). A cut-off level of NRBC ≥ 500/µl was found to best stratify risk and was associated with a longer duration of ICU stay (12 [8; 18] vs. 18 [13; 27] days; p < 0.0001) and longer duration of mechanical ventilation (10 [6; 16] vs. 17 [12; 26] days; p < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis with multivariate adjustment showed NRBCs ≥ 500/µl to be an independent risk factor of mortality (odds ratio (OR) 4.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.95-7.62, p < 0.0001). Patients with NRBC values below the threshold of 500/µl had a significant survival advantage over those above the threshold (median survival 32 [95% CI 8.7-43.3] vs. 21 days [95% CI 18.2-23.8], log-rank test, p < 0.05). Patients who once reached the NRBC threshold of ≥ 500/µl during their ICU stay had a significantly increased long-term mortality (median survival 489 days, log-rank test, p = 0.0029, hazard ratio (HR) 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.5). CONCLUSIONS: NRBCs predict mortality in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS with high prognostic power. Further studies are required to confirm the clinical impact of NRBCs to eventually enhance decision making.

Algorithm for Rapid Exclusion of Clinically Relevant Plasma Levels of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients Using the DOAC Dipstick: An Expert Consensus Paper.

BACKGROUND: With the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), there is an urgent need for a rapid assay to exclude clinically relevant plasma levels. Accurate and rapid determination of DOAC levels would guide medical decision-making to (1) determine the potential contribution of the DOAC to spontaneous or trauma-induced hemorrhage; (2) identify appropriate candidates for reversal, or (3) optimize the timing of urgent surgery or intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: The DOAC Dipstick test uses a disposable strip to identify factor Xa- or thrombin inhibitors in a urine sample. Based on the results of a systematic literature search followed by an analysis of a simple pooling of five retrieved clinical studies, the test strip has a high sensitivity and an acceptably high negative predictive value when compared with levels measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry or calibrated chromogenic assays to reliably exclude plasma DOAC concentrations ≥30 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Based on these data, a simple algorithm is proposed to enhance medical decision-making in acute care indications useful primarily in hospitals not having readily available quantitative tests and 24/7. This algorithm not only determines DOAC exposure but also differentiates between factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors to better guide clinical management.

Monitoring of Argatroban in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Study Comparing Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, Point-of-Care Viscoelastic Testing with Ecarin Clotting Time and Diluted Thrombin Time to Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: The direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban is indicated for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia II, but it is also used off-label to treat critically ill patients presenting with heparin resistance, severe antithrombin deficiency, or hypercoagulability. Direct drug monitoring is not routinely available, and argatroban dosing is mainly based on global coagulation assays such as activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT) or diluted thrombin time (TT), both of which have limitations in patients with hypercoagulability. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from critically ill patients treated with argatroban. Activated PTT and diluted TT were measured with a STA R Max3 analyzer (STAGO Deutschland GmbH, Germany) using an argatroban-calibrated kit. Ecarin clotting time was measured using a point-of-care viscoelastic test device. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was performed using a reversed-phase column, a solvent gradient, and an API4000 mass spectrometer with electrospray. Correlation was described using Pearson correlation coefficient r and Bayesian multilevel regression to estimate relationships between outcomes and covariates. RESULTS: From June 2021 to March 2022, 205 blood samples from 22 patients were analyzed, allowing for 195 activated PTT-liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry comparisons, 153 ecarin clotting time-liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry comparison, and 105 diluted TT-liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry comparisons. Compared to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, performance of argatroban quantification was best for diluted TT (r = 0.91), followed by ecarin clotting time (r = 0.58) and activated PTT (r = 0.48). Regression analysis revealed that patients with sepsis were more prone to argatroban overdosing (coefficient, 4.194; 95% credible interval, 2.220 to 6.792). CONCLUSIONS: Although activated PTT monitoring of argatroban is the most commonly used test, in critically ill patients, diluted TT provides more precise measurements. Alternately, point-of-care viscoelastic ecarin clotting time also provides guidance for argatroban dosing to identify overdosing if available. The data also suggested that patients with sepsis are at greater risk for argatroban overdosing.

Hemostatic disorders associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Hemostatic disorders are common during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-therapy. This includes both bleeding and thrombotic complications. Particularly bleeding is often associated with fatal outcome. The early identification of hemorrhagic diathesis and the diagnosis of the underlying pathology are essential. A distinction into device-, disease-, and drug-related disorders appears reasonable. However, both correct diagnosis and therapy can be challenging and sometimes counterintuitive. Since bleeding seems to be more frequent and dangerous compared to thrombosis, the understanding of coagulation disorders and minimizing anticoagulation has been focused in recent years. Due to progress in membrane coating and configuration of modern ECMO circuits it is even possible to perform ECMO without any anticoagulation in well selected cases. It became apparent that routine laboratory tests are likely to miss severe coagulation disorders during ECMO-therapy. Better understanding can also help to individualize anticoagulation in patients and hence preventing complications. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome, platelet dysfunction, waste coagulopathy as well as silent hemolysis should be taken into account when bleeding or thromboembolic complications appear. Recognizing impaired intrinsic fibrinolysis may favour intensified anticoagulation even in patients exhibiting signs of bleeding. Drug monitoring with standard coagulation tests, viscoelastic tests and anti-Xa-levels as wells as screening for disorders of primary hemostasis should be implemented in clinical routine to guide physicians through complex anticoagulative therapy. The patient's coagulative status should be interpreted taking the underlying disease and current therapy into account in order to enable a personalized approach to hemostasis in patients treated with ECMO.

Bleeding management in patients with direct oral anticoagulants.

Bleeding events in patients under direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) can be life-threating but are commonly not related to drug overdose. However, a relevant DOAC plasma concentration impairs the hemostasis and should therefore be ruled out immediately after hospital admission. The effect of DOAC is typically not visible in standard coagulation tests such as activated partial thrombin time or thromboplastin time. Specific anti-Xa or anti-IIa assays allow a specific drug monitoring, but they are too time-consuming in critical bleeding events and typically not available 24 h/7 d in routine care. Recent advantages in point-of-care (POC) testing might improve patient care by early exclusion of relevant DOAC levels, but sufficient validation is still lacking. POC urine analysis help to exclude DOAC in emergency patients, but does not provide a quantitative information about plasma concentration. POC viscoelastic testing (VET) can determine the DOAC effect on clotting time and helps further to reveal other concomitant bleeding disorders in emergency, e.g., factor deficiency or hyperfibrinolysis. If a relevant plasma concentration of the DOAC is assumed or was proven by either laboratory assays or POC testing, restoration of factor IIa or factor IIa activity is key for effective hemostasis. Limited evidence suggests that specific reversals for DOAC, e.g., idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for apixaban or rivaroxaban, might be superior to increasing thrombin generation by administration of prothrombin complex concentrates. To determinate, if DOAC reversal is indicated or not, time from last intake, anti-Xa/dTT values or results from POC tests can be considered. This experts' opinion provides a feasible decision algorithm for clinical practice.

Treatment of Acquired von Willebrand Disease due to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Pediatric COVID-19 Patient with Vonicog Alfa: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Acquired von Willebrand disease (aVWD) is frequently observed in patients with the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). aVWD can be treated by plasma-derived concentrates containing factor VIII (FVIII) and/or von Willebrand factor (VWF) and recombinant VWF concentrate as well as adjuvant therapies such as tranexamic acid and desmopressin. However, all of these therapeutic options possibly cause thromboembolism. Therefore, the optimal treatment remains uncertain. This report presents a case of a 16-year-old patient suffering from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to coronavirus disease 2019 with the need of ECMO support. Our patient developed aVWD under ECMO therapy characterized by loss of high-molecular-weight multimers (HMWM) and severe bleeding symptoms following endoscopic papillotomy due to sclerosing cholangitis. At the same time standard laboratory parameters showed hypercoagulability with increased fibrinogen level and platelet count. The patient was successfully treated with recombinant VWF concentrate (rVWF; vonicog alfa; Veyvondi) combined with topic tranexamic acid application and cortisone therapy. rVWF concentrate vonicog alfa is characterized by ultra-large multimers and absence of FVIII. Patient could be successfully weaned from ECMO support after 72 days. Multimer analysis 1 week after ECMO decannulation showed an adequate reappearance of HMWM.

Extreme obesity is a strong predictor for in-hospital mortality and the prevalence of long-COVID in severe COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is common in COVID-19 patients and is associated with high mortality. The aim of this observational study was to describe patients' characteristics and outcome, identifying potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality and for developing Long-COVID symptoms. This retrospective study included all patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS (cARDS) in the period from March 2020 to March 2021 who were invasively ventilated at the intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital Dresden, Germany. Between October 2021 and December 2021 patients discharged alive (at minimum 6 months after hospital discharge-midterm survival) were contacted and interviewed about persistent symptoms possibly associated with COVID-19 as well as the quality of their lives using the EQ-5D-5L-questionnaire. Long-COVID was defined as the occurrence of one of the symptoms at least 6 months after discharge. Risk factors for mortality were assessed with Cox regression models and risk factors for developing Long-COVID symptoms by using relative risk (RR) regression. 184 Patients were included in this study (male: n = 134 (73%), median age 67 (range 25-92). All patients were diagnosed with ARDS according to the Berlin Definition. 89% of patients (n = 164) had severe ARDS (Horovitz-index < 100 mmHg). In 27% (n = 49) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was necessary to maintain gas exchange. The median length of in-hospital stay was 19 days (range 1-60). ICU mortality was 51%, hospital mortality 59%. Midterm survival (median 11 months) was 83% (n = 55) and 78% (n = 43) of these patients presented Long-COVID symptoms with fatigue as the most common symptom (70%). Extreme obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2) was the strongest predictor for in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio: 3.147, confidence interval 1.000-9.897) and for developing Long-COVID symptoms (RR 1.61, confidence interval 1.26-2.06). In-hospital mortality in severe cARDS patients was high, but > 80% of patients discharged alive survived the midterm observation period. Nonetheless, most patients developed Long-COVID symptoms. Extreme obesity with BMI > 40 kg/m2 was identified as independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality and for developing Long-COVID symptoms.Trial registration DRKS-ID DRKS00027856.

Enhancing Anticoagulation Monitoring and Therapy in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Reconstruction in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Prospective Observational Trial.

BACKGROUND: In reconstructive surgery, loss of a microvascular free flap due to perfusion disorders, especially thrombosis, is a serious complication. In recent years, viscoelastic testing (VET) has become increasingly important in point-of-care (POC) anticoagulation monitoring. This paper describes a protocol for enhanced anticoagulation monitoring during maxillofacial flap surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study will be to evaluate, in a controlled setting, the predictive value of POC devices for the type of flap perfusion disorders due to thrombosis or bleeding. VET, Platelet monitoring (PM) and standard laboratory tests (SLT) are comparatively examined. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is an investigator-initiated prospective trial in 100 patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery. Patients who undergo reconstructive surgery using microvascular-free flaps will be consecutively enrolled in the study. All patients provide blood samples for VET, PM and SLT at defined time points. The primary outcome is defined as free flap loss during the hospital stay. Statistical analyses will be performed using t-tests, including the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. DISCUSSION: This study will help clarify whether VET can improve individualized patient care in reconstruction surgery. A better understanding of coagulation in relation to flap perfusion disorders may allow real-time adaption of antithrombotic strategies and potentially prevent flap complications.

Predictive ability of viscoelastic testing using ClotPro® for short-term outcome in patients with severe Covid-19 ARDS with or without ECMO therapy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infections are suspected to trigger the coagulation system through various pathways leading to a high incidence of thromboembolic complications, hypercoagulation and impaired fibrinolytic capacity were previously identified as potentially mechanisms. A reliable diagnostic tool for detecting both is still under discussion. This retrospective study is aimed to examine the prognostic relevance of early viscoelastic testing compared to conventional laboratory tests in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: All mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 related ARDS treated in our intensive care unit (ICU) between January and March 2021 were included in this study. Viscoelastic testing (VET) was performed using the ClotPro® system after admission to our ICU. Prevalence of thromboembolic events was observed by standardized screening for venous and pulmonary thromboembolism using complete compression ultrasound and thoracic computed tomography pulmonary angiography at ICU admission, respectively. We examined associations between the severity of ARDS at admission to our ICU, in-hospital mortality and the incidence of thromboembolic events comparing conventional laboratory analysis and VET. ECMO related coagulopathy was investigated in a subgroup analysis. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Of 55 patients enrolled in this study, 22 patients required treatment with ECMO. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 51% of all patients. Overall hospital mortality was 55%. In patients with thromboembolic complications, signs of reduced fibrinolytic capacity could be detected in the TPA assay with prolonged lysis time, median 460 s (IQR 350-560) vs 359 s (IQR 287-521, p = 0.073). Patients with moderate to severe ARDS at admission to our ICU showed increased maximum clot firmness as a sign of hypercoagulation in the EX-test (70 vs 67 mm, p < 0.05), FIB-test (35 vs 24 mm, p < 0.05) and TPA-test (52 vs 36 mm, p < 0.05) as well as higher values of inflammatory markers (CRP, PCT and IL6). ECMO patients suffered more frequently from bleeding complications (32% vs 15%). CONCLUSION: Although, the predictive value for thromboembolic complications or mortality seems limited, point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation testing might be useful in detecting hypercoagulable states and impaired fibrinolysis in critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients and could be helpful in identifying patients with a potentially very severe course of the disease.

Point-of-Care Assessment of Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of ischemic stroke with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) must be delivered within a narrow time window after symptom onset. This effective hyperacute treatment can be administered after ruling out active anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Whenever this is impractical, e.g., due to aphasia, plasmatic DOAC levels are measured with a consequent delay in the IVT decision-making process ranging from 30 to 60 minutes of time. This study will test the hypothesis that hyperacute point-of-care assessment of clotting time in the patient's whole blood has sufficient diagnostic accuracy to determine immediately whether stroke patients are pretreated with DOAC. METHODS AND DESIGN: This will be a prospective single-center diagnostic accuracy study in 1,850 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients at a tertiary stroke center in Saxony, Germany. Presence of active anticoagulation with DOAC will be determined by point-of-care quantification of clotting time via whole blood viscoelastic testing (ClotPro) using Russell venom viper and ecarin assay compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry as the reference standard. DISCUSSION: Viscoelastic point-of-care assessment of clotting time in whole blood might improve swift delivery of time-sensitive hyperacute treatment with IVT in stroke patients.

Real-Time Monitoring of Blood Parameters in the Intensive Care Unit: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives.

The number of patients in intensive care units has increased over the past years. Critically ill patients are treated with a real time support of the instruments that offer monitoring of relevant blood parameters. These parameters include blood gases, lactate, and glucose, as well as pH and temperature. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, continuous management of dynamic deteriorating parameters in patients is more relevant than ever before. This narrative review aims to summarize the currently available literature regarding real-time monitoring of blood parameters in intensive care. Both, invasive and non-invasive methods are described in detail and discussed in terms of general advantages and disadvantages particularly in context of their use in different medical fields but especially in critical care. The objective is to explicate both, well-known and frequently used as well as relatively unknown devices. Furtehrmore, potential future direction in research and development of realtime sensor systems are discussed. Therefore, the discussion section provides a brief description of current developments in biosensing with special emphasis on their technical implementation. In connection with these developments, the authors focus on different electrochemical approaches to invasive and non-invasive measurements in vivo.

Characteristics and outcomes of sepsis patients with and without COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe and compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in critically ill septic patients with and without COVID-19. METHODS: From February 2020 to March 2021, patients from surgical and medical ICUs at the University Hospital Dresden were screened for sepsis. Patient characteristics and outcomes were assessed descriptively. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Associations between in-hospital mortality and risk factors were modeled using robust Poisson regression, which facilitates derivation of adjusted relative risks. RESULTS: In 177 ICU patients treated for sepsis, COVID-19 was diagnosed and compared to 191 septic ICU patients without COVID-19. Age and sex did not differ significantly between sepsis patients with and without COVID-19, but SOFA score at ICU admission was significantly higher in septic COVID-19 patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients with 59% compared to 29% in Non-COVID patients. Statistical analysis resulted in an adjusted relative risk for in-hospital mortality of 1.74 (95%-CI=1.35-2-24) in the presence of COVID-19 compared to other septic patients. Age, procalcitonin maximum value over 2 ng/ml, need for renal replacement therapy, need for invasive ventilation and septic shock were identified as additional risk factors for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 was identified as independent risk factor for higher in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients. The need for invasive ventilation and renal replacement therapy as well as the presence of septic shock and higher PCT should be considered to identify high-risk patients.

Point of care coagulation management in anesthesiology and critical care.

Point of care (POC) devices are increasingly used in the ICU and in anesthesia. Besides POC-devices for blood gas analysis, several devices are available for coagulation measurements. Although basic principles for thromboelastographic measurements are not novel, some promising developments were made during the last decade improving both user-friendliness and measurement reliability. For instance, POC measurements of activated clotting time (ACT) for heparin monitoring is still regarded as standard-of-care in cardiac interventions and surgery. In the field of anesthesia and intensive care medicine, POC-devices for thromboelastographic and platelet aggregation measurements are widely used. Their impact in case of bleeding and patient blood management for cardiothoracic and trauma surgery is well known. Moreover, there are promising concepts for anticoagulation monitoring including new oral anticoagulant drugs. Coagulation POC-devices may also identify patients at specific risk for thromboembolic events quickly. On the other hand, benefits of POC-devices need to be balanced against limitations, which include technical restrictions and operator related errors, mainly affecting reproducibility and interpretation of results. Therefore, it is recommendable to consider results of POC-coagulation testing in comparison to standard laboratory tests (SLT). Nevertheless, in urgent or emergency situations POC results enable fast decision making to optimize patient care.

Early and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing reoperative aortic root replacement.

OBJECTIVES: There are limited data on aortic root replacement (ARR) in patients with previous cardiac surgery. We analysed short-term and long-term results for patients with ARR after previous cardiac surgery. METHODS: From September 1995 to April 2015, 130 patients underwent reoperative ARR. Fifty patients had undergone ARR previously (Group I), and 80 had been treated by isolated aortic valve repair or replacement (Group II). The primary indications for surgery were active endocarditis in 65 patients (50%), aneurysmatic root dilatation in another 37 (28.5%) and valve failure in 27 (20.8%). RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 10% (n = 13). Survival at 10 and 15 years was 59.4% and 40.6%, respectively. Survival at 10 and 15 years was 71.5% and 62.5% in Group I and 56.2% and 35.4% in Group II, respectively (P = 0.14). Survival was significantly worse in patients operated for active endocarditis (23.7% vs 56.4% at 15 years; P < 0.001). Inferior 15-year survival was also observed for patients requiring concomitant surgery for cardiac comorbidities (10.5% vs 48.7%; P = 0.003) and in the elderly (≥60 years; 26.8% vs 59.5%; P < 0.001). Ten-year survival was best in patients after valve-preserving root replacement (100%). Multivariable analysis revealed age, active endocarditis and concomitant surgery for cardiac comorbidities as risk factors for death. CONCLUSIONS: ARR after previous cardiac surgery can be performed with reasonable short-term and long-term survival. It is inferior in patients with active endocarditis or cardiac comorbidities and in the elderly. In these scenarios, less invasive procedures may be considered where applicable.