Transfer of airway skills from manikin training to patient: success of ventilation with facemask or LMA-Supreme(TM) by medical students.

During emergency care, the ability to ventilate the patient's lungs is a crucial skill. Supraglottic airway devices have an established role in emergency care, and manikin trials have shown that placement is easy even for inexperienced users. However, there is current discussion as to what extent these results can be transferred to patients. We studied the transfer of skills learnt on a manikin to the clinical situation in novice medical students during their anaesthesia rotation. They were required to ventilate the lungs of a manikin using a facemask and then position a supraglottic airway device (LMA-Supreme™) and ventilate the lungs. This process was then repeated on anaesthetised patients, with standard ventilator settings to assess adequacy of ventilation. Sixty-three students participated in the manikin study. The success rate for ventilating the lungs was 100% for both devices, but the mean (SD) time to achieve successful ventilation was 27.8 (24.4) s with the facemask compared with 38.6 (22.0) s with the LMA-Supreme (p = 0.008). Fifty-one of the students progressed to the second part of the study. In anaesthetised patients, the success rate for ventilating the lungs was lower for the facemask, 27/41 (66%) compared with the LMA-Supreme 37/41 (90%, p = 0.006). For 26 students who succeeded with both devices, the tidal volume was lower using the facemask, 431 (192) ml compared with the LMA-Supreme 751 (221) ml (p = 0.001), but the time to successful ventilation did not differ, 60.0 (26.2) s vs 57.3 (26.6) s (p = 0.71). We conclude that the results obtained in manikin studies cannot be transferred directly to the clinical situation and that guidelines should take this into account. Based on our findings, a supraglottic airway device may be preferable to a facemask as the first choice for inexperienced emergency caregivers.

The use of the Foley Airway Stylet Tool® to guide tracheal intubations through an intubating laryngeal mask airway.

BACKGROUND: Blind insertion of endotracheal tubes through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) is unsuccessful in almost 50% of cases on the first attempt, with an overall success rate of approximately 90%. We used a portable fiber optic device (Foley Airway Stylet Tool® FAST) to detect the reasons for failed intubations and tested its use in facilitating endotracheal tube placement. METHODS: Thirty patients without anticipated intubation difficulties participated in the study. The fiber optic device was fastened with its tip at the end of the endotracheal tube, and both instruments were advanced through the previously inserted ILMA past the lifting bar. The view was scored in the following manner: I, full view of laryngeal inlet; II, partial vocal cords, arytenoids, epiglottis; III, epiglottis; IV, no laryngeal structures identifiable. The ILMA was adjusted for the best obtainable view, which was scored, and the endotracheal tube was inserted. RESULTS: The initial laryngeal view was I in four patients, II in eighteen patients, III in one patient and IV in seven patients. The best view after corrective maneuvers was I in twenty-seven patients, II in two patients and IV in one patient. First attempt tracheal intubations were successful in twenty-seven (90%) patients; two patients required a second attempt. CONCLUSION: A grade II view or worse indicated misalignment of the ILMA with the glottis. An endotracheal tube inserted blindly through the misaligned ILMA will impinge on and potentially damage laryngeal structures. The use of a portable fiber optic device can help reduce the failure rate of endotracheal intubations by utilizing ILMA in emergent situations.

[Out-of-hospital pediatric emergencies. Perception and assessment by emergency physicians]. / Präklinische Kindernotfälle. Notärztliche Wahrnehmung und Einschätzung.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital (OOH) pediatric emergencies have a relatively low prevalence. In Germany the vast majority of cases are attended by non-specialized emergency physicians (EPs) for whom these are not routine procedures. This may lead to insecurity and fear. However, it is unknown how EPs perceive and assess pediatric emergencies and how they could be better prepared for them. METHODS: All active EPs (n=50) of the Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine at the University Medical Centre of Göttingen were presented with a structured questionnaire in order to evaluate their perception and assessment of OOH pediatric emergencies. RESULTS: The 43 participating EPs made highly detailed statements on the expected characteristics of OOH pediatric emergencies. Their confidence level grew with the children's age (p<0.03) and with their own experience (p<0.01). The EPs felt particular deficits in the fields of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=18) and trauma management (n=8). The preferred educational strategies included simulator-based training (n=24) as well as more exposure to pediatric intensive care and pediatric anesthesia (n=12). CONCLUSIONS: Despite their own limited experience EPs can realistically assess the incidence and severity of pediatric emergencies. They felt the greatest deficits were in the care of infrequent but life-threatening emergencies. Three educational groups can be differentiated: knowledge and skills to be gained with children in hospital, clinical experience from adult care also applicable in children and rare diagnoses and interventions to be trained with manikins or simulators.

[Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel. Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity]. / Evaluation der neuen Kehlkopfmasken Ambu AuraOnce und Intersurgical i-gel: Platzierbarkeit, Dichtigkeit, Patientenkomfort und Atemwegsmorbidität.

BACKGROUND: Supraglottic airway devices (SGAD) have become more important in airway management over the past years and an objective comparison of the available devices is in order. METHODS: In a prospective study the four SGADs LMA-Classic(cLMA), LMA-ProSeal (PLMA), Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel were compared in groups of 40 patients in ambulatory surgery, with respect to the feasibility of positioning, leak tightness, patient comfort and airway morbidity. The seal test of the airway devices was carried out with a specially constructed pneumotachograph. RESULTS: Adequate placement on the first attempt was achieved in 92.5% with the cLMA, 85% with the PLMA, 92.5% with the AuraOnce and 82.5% with the i-gel (p>0.05). There were no clinically relevant differences in mean insertion times: cLMA 13.8 s (+/-3.4 s), PLMA 13 s (+/-3.2 s), AuraOnce 11.2 s (+/-2.7 s; p<0.05) and 13.9 s (+/-3.6 s) with the i-gel. A tight seal at a constant oropharyngeal pressure of 15 cmH(2)O was achieved in 85% of the cases (34 cases) with the cLMA, 90% (36 cases) with the PLMA, 97.5% (39 cases) with the AuraOnce and 72.5% (29 cases) with the i-gel (p<0.05). A tight seal at a constant oropharyngeal pressure of 20 cmH(2)O was seen in 62.5% with the cLMA, 60% with the PLMA, 67.5% with the AuraOnce and in 50% with the i-gel of the cases (p>0.05). Airway morbidity was not observed in any group. Significantly more patients complained of a sore throat after using the cLMA (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The tested SGADs were comparable with regard to ease of insertion, insertion times and airway morbidity. Considering leak tightness and patient comfort the PLMA and the AuraOnce fared better with regard to tightness of seal and patient comfort.

[Teaching and simulation. Methods, demands, evaluation and visions]. / Lehre und Simulation. Methoden, Anforderungen, Evaluation und Visionen.

Since 1st October 2003 the new German "Approbationsordnung für Arzte" (Medical Licensing Regulations) requires an increasing amount of small group teaching sessions and encourages a multidisciplinary and more practical approach to the related topics. In 2004 the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine has provided almost all anaesthesia faculties of German Universities with equipment for full-scale simulation. This article describes methods for a simulation-based medical education training program. Basic requirements for a successful training program using full scale simulators are the provision of an adequate logistical and material infrastructure, teacher attendance of train-the-trainer courses, implementation in the medical curriculum and an instructor-student ratio of 1:3, equivalent to that for bedside teaching. If these requirements were fulfilled, medical students scored the simulation scenarios "induction of anaesthesia", "acute pulmonary embolism", "acute management of a multiple trauma patient" and "postoperative hypotension" as 1.5, 1.6, 1.5 and 1.5, respectively, on a scale of 1-6. These scores were better than those given for other segments of the curriculum.

[Simulation and airway management]. / Simulation und Atemwegsmanagement.

Despite the development of new devices and strategies to manage and secure the difficult airway, morbidity and mortality in anaesthesia due to airway problems such as difficult intubation or unrecognised failed intubation remain high. The problem seems to lie in the transfer of skills and strategies to daily clinical practice. Common methods for airway management training include theoretical instructions and hands-on sessions with manikins, animal models and cadavers. Simulation provides the opportunity to train skills and resolve specific situations embedded in a realistic scenario, facilitate the transfer of cognitive, psychomotor and affective abilities into daily clinical practice and help to improve behaviour in critical situations. This article outlines new training concepts in airway management with the help of simulation and simulators. We describe technical prerequisites and provide information on the implementation of difficult airway scenarios.