Toxic effects of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac. Part II: cytological effects in liver, kidney, gills and intestine of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

In the present study, cytopathology was investigated in the liver, kidney, gills and gut of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to five different concentrations (1, 5, 20, 100 and 500 microg/L) of the anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac under laboratory conditions. The lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) for cytological alterations in liver, kidney and gills was 1 microg/L. In the gut, however, no diclofenac-induced cytopathology occurred. As the most prominent reactions induced by diclofenac (1) in the kidney, a severe accumulation of protein in the tubular cells (so called hyaline droplet degeneration), macrophage infiltration and structural alterations (dilation, vesiculation) of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in the proximal and distal renal tubules were observed. Furthermore, shortening of podocytes and their retraction from the basal lamina, a thickening of the basal lamina, the formation of desmosomes, and necrosis of endothelial cells in the renal corpuscles occurred; (2) in the liver, the most striking reactions were the collapse of the cellular compartmentation as well as the glycogen depletion of hepatocytes; (3) in the gills, pillar cell necrosis, hypertrophy of chloride cells, and epithelium lifting became evident in the secondary lamellae.

Moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin clavulanate in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis: a primary care experience.

In this prospective, multicentre, randomised, non-blinded phase III clinical trial, 475 adult patients with acute sinusitis received a 10-day oral regimen of either moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily) or amoxicillin clavulanate (875 mg twice daily). The primary measure of efficacy was clinical resolution. Secondary outcome measures included clinical relapse at follow-up and evaluation of patient reported outcomes. Of 471 adults comprising the intent-to-treat population (234 moxifloxacin, 237 amoxicillin/clavulanate), moxifloxacin treatment was statistically equivalent to amoxicillin/clavulanate at the test-of-cure visit (85% vs 82%; 95% CI -6%, 13%). Analysis of the efficacy evaluable population, confirmed statistical equivalence (86% vs 84%; 95% CI -7%, 13%). Of note, by day 3 of treatment, significantly more moxifloxacin-treated patients (n = 47; 24%), than amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients (n = 28; 14%), reported feeling better (p < 0.02). Frequency of drug-related adverse events were similar between groups: nausea (11% moxifloxacin, 5% amoxicillin/clavulanate) and diarrhoea (3% moxifloxacin, 10% amoxicillin clavulanate). In conclusion, once-daily moxifloxacin is as effective and safe as twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute sinusitis. Moxifloxacin is associated with more rapid symptomatic relief.

Efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin oral suspension versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole oral suspension for treatment of older women with acute urinary tract infection.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (CIP) oral suspension to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) oral suspension among older women with acute urinary tract infections (UTIs). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of older women (age 65 and older). SETTING: Community and nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 261 older women were evaluable for safety. Of these, 172 (86 community, 86 nursing home) were evaluable for clinical and bacteriological efficacy. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to a 10-day regimen of either CIP (250 mg/5 mL twice daily) or TMP/SMX (160/800 mg/20 mL twice daily). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical response 4 to 10 days posttherapy. RESULTS: For the efficacy-valid population, posttherapy clinical resolution was statistically superior following CIP (97%) versus TMP/SMX (85%) (95% CI=2.0-21.3; P= .009). Eradication of pretreatment bacterial isolates posttherapy was also higher following CIP (95%) versus TMP/SMX (84%) (95% CI=2.7-21.3; P= .019). For the intent-to-treat population, posttherapy clinical resolution was significantly higher in the CIP group (96%) than in the TMP/SMX group (87%) (95% CI=0.2-16.7; P= .025). Safety was assessed in the intent-to-treat population and the incidence of drug-related adverse events were significantly lower following CIP (17%) than following TMP/SMX (27%) (P= .047). Premature discontinuation due to these events was also less prevalent with CIP than with TMP/SMX (2% vs 11%, respectively) (P= .004). CONCLUSION: CIP suspension showed higher clinical success and bacteriological eradication rates than did TMP/SMX for both community-based and nursing home-residing older women with acute UTIs. Furthermore, CIP suspension was associated with significantly lower rates of adverse events and premature discontinuations compared with TMP/SMX suspension.

The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

Chronic bronchitis is common among adults and infectious exacerbations contribute considerably to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin to azithromycin for the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) of suspected bacterial origin. Between October 1998 and April 1999, 567 patients with AECB were enrolled at 37 centers across the United States and Canada of which 280 (49%) had acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (i.e. pretherapy pathogen). Patients were randomized to either oral moxifloxacin 400 mg administered once daily for 5 days or azithromycin for 5 days (500 mg qd x 1, then 250 mg qd x 4). For the purpose of study blinding, all patients received encapsulated tablets. The main outcome measure was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (14-21 days post-therapy). Secondary measures included bacteriologic response and a time-course of bacteriological eradication (one center only). Three patient populations were analysed for efficacy: clinically-valid, microbiologically-valid (i.e. those with a pretherapy pathogen), and intent-to-treat (i.e. received at least one dose of study drug). For the efficacy-valid group, clinical response at the test-of-cure visit was 88% for patients in each treatment group. In 237 microbiologically-valid patients, corresponding clinical resolution rates were 88% for 5-day moxifloxacin vs. 86% for 5-day azithromycin. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 95% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 94% for the azithromycin group. Corresponding eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit were 89% and 86%, respectively. Of note, eradication rates at test-of-cure for Haem. philos influenzae and H. parainfluenzae for moxifloxacin were 97% and 88% compared to 83% and 62% respectively for azithromycin. Among 567 intent-to-treat patients (283 moxifloxacin and 284 azithromycin), drug-related events were reported for 22% and 17%, respectively. Diarrhea and nausea were the most common drug-related events reported in each treatment group. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 5 days was found to be clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to 5-day azithromycin for the treatment of AECB of proven bacterial etiology. Given its excellent in-vitro activity, especially against antibiotic-resistant respiratory pathogens, and its acceptable safety profile, moxifloxacin should be considered an effective alternative therapy for patients with AECB of suspected bacterial origin.

Retrospective analysis of the safety profile of oral and intravenous ciprofloxacin in a geriatric population.

BACKGROUND: Ciprofloxacin is a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic used in the treatment of a wide range of mild to moderate gram-positive and gram-negative infections. Although extensive information is available on the safety profile of ciprofloxacin in adults, few published data exist regarding the tolerability and toxicity of this drug in patients aged > or = 65 years. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this retrospective analysis were to compare the safety profile of ciprofloxacin in patients aged > or = 65 years versus patients aged <65 years and to compare the adverse-event profile of ciprofloxacin with that of other comparator antimicrobial agents used in clinical trials. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 23 prospective, controlled anti-infective clinical trials in the US Bayer ciprofloxacin database that included patients aged > or = 65 years. These trials comprised the submission file of the original and supplemental New Drug Application for ciprofloxacin. The incidence of treatment-emergent and drug-related adverse events was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 6863 patients in these 23 clinical trials, 3579 received ciprofloxacin therapy and 3284 received comparator antimicrobial agents. Of the ciprofloxacin-treated patients, 898 (25.1%) were aged > or = 65 years; 887 (27.0%) of the patients who received comparator antimicrobial agents were aged > or = 65 years. Among ciprofloxacin-treated patients, drug-related adverse events were reported more often in those aged <65 years (24.0%) compared with those aged > or = 65 years (17.9%). The incidence of drug-related adverse events in the comparator group was also higher in those aged <65 years (25.1%) than in those aged > or = 65 years (16.8%). Premature discontinuation due to any adverse event was reported in 3.9% (105 of 2681) and 3.7% (33 of 898) of ciprofloxacin-treated patients aged <65 years and > or = 65 years, respectively. Corresponding rates for the comparator antimicrobial group were 3.9% (93 of 2397) and 3.8% (34 of 887), respectively, for patients aged <65 years and > or = 65 years. The most common drug-related adverse events reported for ciprofloxacin-treated patients aged <65 years and > or = 65 years were digestive system-related (18.1% and 11.4%, respectively) and central nervous system-related events (6.6% and 4.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis suggests that there is no clinically important difference in the safety profile of ciprofloxacin in patients aged > or = 65 years versus patients aged <65 years.

Moxifloxacin versus cephalexin in the treatment of uncomplicated skin infections.

The efficacy and safety of oral moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily, 7 days) versus cephalexin (500 mg three times daily, 7 days) were compared in a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial in 401 adults with uncomplicated skin infections. Clinical outcome was evaluated in 351 patients. Moxifloxacin proved to be as effective as cephalexin both clinically (90% versus 91%, respectively) and bacteriologically in eradicating the most frequently isolated pathogen Staphylococcus aureus (92% and 93%, respectively). Moxifloxacin was more effective than cephalexin in eliminating Streptococcus spp. (90% and 82%, respectively). Drug-related adverse events were comparable in both treatment groups with the most frequently reported being nausea in the moxifloxacin-treated patients and headache in the cephalexin-treated patients. Medication was discontinued due to unwanted reactions in 3% of the moxifloxacin- and 4% of the cephalexin-treated patients. Moxifloxacin, 400 mg once daily for 7 days, is as safe and effective as cephalexin 500 mg three times daily for 7 days in the treatment of uncomplicated skin infections.

Comparison of moxifloxacin and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis. Sinusitis Infection Study Group.

The aim of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin with those of cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of community-acquired acute sinusitis. Five hundred forty-two adult patients with symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute maxillary sinusitis received a 10-day oral regimen of either moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily) or cefuroxime axetil (250 mg twice daily). Acute signs and symptoms at presentation had lasted >7 days but <4 weeks. Clinical response at the end of therapy (7 to 14 days after treatment) was the primary efficacy variable. Four hundred fifty-seven of the patients (223 moxifloxacin, 234 cefuroxime axetil) were included in the clinical efficacy analysis. Moxifloxacin was found to be similar in effectiveness to cefuroxime axetil at the end-of-therapy visit (90% vs. 89%, respectively; 95% confidence interval, -5.1% to 6.2%). Clinical relapse at the follow-up visit was reported for only 8 patients (3 moxifloxacin, 5 cefuroxime axetil). No clinically significant differences were observed with respect to the number of patients experiencing a successful clinical response based on demographic or infection characteristics. Five of the 542 enrolled patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 537 patients in the intent-to-treat population, drug-related adverse events were reported in 37% of moxifloxacin-treated patients and in 26% of cefuroxime axetil-treated patients (P = 0.006). Adverse-event profiles were comparable in the 2 treatment groups, with the exception of nausea, which was reported by 11% of moxifloxacin-treated patients compared with 4% of cef uroxime axetil-treated patients (P = 0.003). In this study, moxifloxacin was as effective as cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of community-acquired acute sinusitis.

Double-blind comparative trial of ciprofloxacin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Sinusitis Infection Study Group.

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial compared the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (CIP; 500 mg twice daily for 10 days, placebo for 4 days) to those of clarithromycin (CLARI; 500 mg twice daily for 14 days) in 560 adults with clinically documented and radiologically confirmed acute sinusitis. Of 457 efficacy-valid adults (236 CIP, 221 CLARI), clinical resolution plus improvement at the end of therapy was 84% for CIP-treated patients compared to 91% of CLARI recipients (CI95 = -0.131, -0.013). At the 1-month follow-up, more than twice as many CLARI-treated patients, 18 (10%), experienced a relapse, compared to 7 (4%) CIP-treated patients. The combined clinical response analyses (end of therapy and 1 -month follow-up) demonstrated that CIP and CLARI were statistically equivalent (CI95 = -0.106, 0.044). Diarrhea, nausea, headache, and dizziness were the most frequently reported drug-related adverse events in both treatment groups; diarrhea and taste perversion were reported more frequently among CLARI recipients. In summary, the combined end of therapy and follow-up clinical evaluation analyses revealed that CIP and CLARI were equally effective in the management of acute sinusitis, although twice as many relapses were reported among CLARI recipients.

A randomized trial of short-course ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of acute urinary tract infection in women. Ciprofloxacin Urinary Tract Infection Group.

PURPOSE: Bladder infections are very common in otherwise healthy women, and short-course antimicrobial treatment appears effective for many episodes of cystitis. This study reports the results of short-course ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of a 3-day course of oral ciprofloxacin 100 mg twice daily, ofloxacin 200 mg twice daily, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160/800 mg twice daily in women with acute, uncomplicated, symptomatic lower urinary tract infection. RESULTS: A total of 866 patients were enrolled, of whom 688 (79%) were evaluated for the efficacy of treatment (229 treated with ciprofloxacin, 228 treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 231 treated with ofloxacin). The most frequent reason for exclusion was the failure to identify a pretreatment pathogen. The most commonly isolated pathogen was Escherichia coli (81%). Eradication of the pretreatment pathogen at the end of therapy occurred in 94% of ciprofloxacin, 93% of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 97% of ofloxacin-treated patients. At follow-up evaluation at 4 to 6 weeks, recurrence rates (relapse or reinfection) were 11% in the ciprofloxacin, 16% in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 13% in the ofloxacin treatment group. Clinical success at the end of therapy was 93% in the ciprofloxacin, 95% in the trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 96% in the ofloxacin treatment groups. The frequency of all adverse events was 31% for ciprofloxacin, 41% for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 39% for ofloxacin-treated patients (P = 0.03). Premature discontinuation of study drug due to an adverse event was more common in trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-treated patients (n = 9) compared with those given ciprofloxacin (n = 2) or ofloxacin (n = 1; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole had similar efficacy when given for 3 days to treat acute, symptomatic, uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection in women.

Ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Sinusitis Infection Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin to cefuroxime axetil for the management of acute bacterial sinusitis or acute exacerbations of chronic sinusitis. METHOD: In this prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 501 adult outpatients seen in 17 otolaryngology offices with both symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute maxillary sinusitis randomly received oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.) or cefuroxime axetil (250 mg b.i.d.), each for 10 days. Patients were further subclassified as having either acute sinusitis or an acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis. All patients underwent maxillary sinus aspiration at study entry to establish a microbiologic etiology. The primary measure of efficacy was the rate of clinical success in the efficacy-valid population at the end of therapy. Secondary measures included bacteriologic response at the end of therapy, and 2- to 4-week clinical and bacteriologic follow-up response rates in both efficacy-valid and intent-to-treat groups. RESULTS: Haemophilus influenzae (21%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (19%), Moraxella catarrhalis (14%), and Staphylococcus aureus (9%) were the most commonly isolated pathogens (target organisms) among the 225 causative organisms identified from 189 patients. Of 453 adults valid for clinical efficacy (228 ciprofloxacin, 225 cefuroxime axetil), ciprofloxacin treatment was statistically equivalent to cefuroxime axetil at the end of treatment (87% vs. 83%; CI95 = -0.021 ... 0.106) and at follow-up (91% vs. 88%; CI95 = -0.044 ... 0.080). The clinical response was similar for subgroups of patients with positive cultures, including the subset with target organisms. Bacteriologic eradication at end of therapy was similar between the two groups (97% ciprofloxacin, 95% cefuroxime axetil). Both treatments were equally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin is as effective as cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of community-acquired acute sinusitis.

Ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of adult patients with acute bacterial sinusitis.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the use and efficacy of ciprofloxacin to cefuroxime axetil for adult patients with acute bacterial sinusitis. METHOD: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study of oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) versus cefuroxime axetil (250 mg twice daily) for 2 to 3 weeks in the treatment of adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute bacterial maxillary sinus infections or acute exacerbation of chronic bacterial sinusitis. Patients with microbiologically and radiologically confirmed sinusitis infection composed the efficacy population. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients enrolled, 13 of 42 (31%) ciprofloxacin- and 19 of 41 (46%) cefuroxime axetil-treated patients had a respiratory pathogen isolated from a sinus aspiration. The most frequent pretherapy isolated included Haemophilus influenzae (11), streptococcus species (20), staphylococcus species (7), Proteus mirabilis (3), and Neisseria sicca (3). At the end of therapy, clinical resolution or improvement in efficacy-valid patients was achieved in 12 (100%) ciprofloxacin-treated patients and in 14 (74%) cefuroxime axetil recipients. The five (26%) cefuroxime axetil clinical failures were due to development of superinfection. Bacteriologic eradication occurred in 12 (100%) and 14 (100%) ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime axetil patients, respectively. Similar clinical and bacteriologic response rates were observed at the 2- to 4-week follow-up. Among 83 intent-to-treat patients, 19 (45%) ciprofloxacin and 14 (34%) cefuroxime axetil patients had drug-related adverse events. The most common adverse event in both treatment groups was gastrointestinal. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that ciprofloxacin is efficacious in the management of acute bacterial sinusitis.

Short-course ciprofloxacin treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. The minimum effective dose. The Urinary Tract Infection Study Group [corrected].

BACKGROUND: Three studies were undertaken to determine the minimum effective dosing regimen of ciprofloxacin for the treatment of acute, symptomatic, uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection. METHODS: All studies were multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trials. A total of 970 evaluable patients with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection received oral ciprofloxacin (200 mg to 500 mg daily in one or two divided doses for 1, 3, 5, or 7 days) or norfloxacin (400 mg twice daily [BID] for 7 days). The primary measure of efficacy was bacteriologic eradication at the end of therapy. RESULTS: In study 1, bacteriologic eradication was reported in 95 (89%) and 101 (98%) of patients in the groups who received ciprofloxacin, 500-mg single dose and 250 mg BID for 7 days, respectively. Clinical success occurred in 101 patients (94%) who received a 500-mg single dose and in 103 patients (100%) who were administered 250 mg BID for 7 days. In study 2, eradication rates in the groups who received ciprofloxacin, 100 mg BID for 3 days, 250 mg BID for 3 days, and 250 mg BID for 7 days, were 98 (93%), 95 (90%), and 98 (93%), respectively. Clinical success was reported in 102 (97%), 105 (100%), and 104 (98%) of the patients, respectively. In study 3, the eradication rates in the groups who received ciprofloxacin in dosages of 500 mg once daily for 3 days and 500 mg once daily for 5 days and norfloxacin in a dosage of 400 mg BID for 7 days were 137 (92%), 134 (90%), and 133 (94%) of the women, respectively. Clinical success was the same (97%) in all three groups. Overall, short-course (either 3- or 5-day) therapy with ciprofloxacin was statistically equivalent to conventional (7-day) therapy with either ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin. Single-dose ciprofloxacin therapy was statistically less effective than conventional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofloxacin at a dosage of 100 mg BID for 3 days was the minimum effective dose for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women.

Single-dose ciprofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea: a worldwide summary.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic therapy for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections has evolved owing to the development of resistance to penicillin and tetracycline therapy. A variety of antimicrobials, including the fluoroquinolones, have been proposed as useful alternatives. GOAL OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral ciprofloxacin as single-dose treatment for urogenital and extragenital gonococcal infections. STUDY DESIGN: 1180 patients with uncomplicated gonococcal infection received single-dose ciprofloxacin regimens ranging from 100 mg to 2000 mg to demonstrate microbiologic efficacy and to determine the minimum effective dose. Eight of 18 studies were randomized, controlled trials with ampicillin/probenecid, amoxicillin/probenecid, ceftriaxone, or spectinomycin as control drugs. RESULTS: Although a ciprofloxacin dose-response was not detected, 250 mg was used in most of the studies. Among 815 patients with 910 infected sites receiving 250 mg of ciprofloxacin, bacteriologic eradication was achieved in 563 (100%) male urethral, 199 (100%) female cervical, 101 (99%) male and female rectal, and 47 (96%) male and female pharyngeal sites. CONCLUSION: Although the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have identified 500 mg of ciprofloxacin as a single-dose treatment regimen for uncomplicated gonorrhea, the clinical data from the multinational studies indicate that a 250-mg single-dose of ciprofloxacin is equally effective in the management of uncomplicated gonorrhea, including extragenital sites of infection.

PIP: Between 1983 and 1990, an international review of 18 clinical trials was conducted to identify a single-dose regimen of ciprofloxacin that will attain at least a 95% efficacy rate for urogenital and extragenital uncomplicated Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. The trials took place in the US, Argentina, the UK, Finland, Thailand, South Africa, Spain, Belgium, Poland, and the Netherlands. The studies consisted of 1180 patients who received a single-dose of 100-2000 mg ciprofloxacin. 8 studies compared the single-dose ciprofloxacin regimen with ampicillin/probenecid, amoxicillin/probenecid, ceftriaxone, or spectinomycin. 15 studies used, at least, a single-dose of 250 mg ciprofloxacin to treat 815 patients with 910 infected sites. This dose eradicated N. gonorrhoeae from 100% of male urethral, 100% of female cervical, 99% of male and female rectal, and 96% of male and female pharyngeal sites. In all 18 studies, ciprofloxacin was well tolerated. The leading side effects were headache and nausea. The wholesale cost of a single dose of 250 mg ciprofloxacin is lower than that of other antibiotics used to treat uncomplicated gonorrhea ($2.53 vs. $3.36 for 400 mg ofloxacin, $3.84 for 125 mg ceftriaxone, and $5.60 for 400 mg cefixime). Even though WHO and the US Centers for Disease Control recommend a single-dose of 500 mg ciprofloxacin to treat uncomplicated gonorrhea, the findings of the international studies suggest that a single dose of 250 mg ciprofloxacin effectively treats uncomplicated gonorrhea, even extragenital sites of infection.

Compatibility of ciprofloxacin injection with selected drugs and solutions.

The compatibility of ciprofloxacin injection with selected antimicrobials and aminophylline was studied. Ciprofloxacin, amikacin sulfate, aminophylline, clindamycin phosphate, gentamicin sulfate, and tobramycin sulfate were mixed separately in minibags containing 0.9% sodium chloride injection or 5% dextrose injection; admixtures were stored for up to 48 hours at either 4 degrees C or 25 degrees C. Ciprofloxacin was also combined separately with each of the other drugs and solutions and stored under the same conditions. In addition, ciprofloxacin was combined with metronidazole in ready-to-use mini-bags of the latter drug and stored at 25 degrees C. Drug concentrations were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay or high-performance liquid chromatography. All admixtures were also examined visually. Stability was defined as retention of at least 90% of the original drug concentration with no visual evidence of incompatibility. With one exception, drugs in all single-drug admixtures were stable for 48 hours. The drug concentration eight hours after amikacin was mixed in 0.9% sodium chloride and refrigerated was 89% of the original concentration. When ciprofloxacin was combined with gentamicin, metronidazole, or tobramycin, all of the involved drugs were stable for 48 hours. Compatibility of ciprofloxacin-amikacin admixtures depended on the fluid and storage temperature; all such admixtures were stable for at least eight hours. A precipitate formed immediately whenever ciprofloxacin was mixed with clindamycin and within four hours after ciprofloxacin was mixed with aminophylline. Ciprofloxacin injection was compatible with gentamicin, metronidazole, and tobramycin and incompatible with aminophylline and clindamycin. The compatibility of ciprofloxacin-amikacin admixtures depended on the i.v. solution and storage temperature.

Safety of intravenous ciprofloxacin. A review.

Data from 1,878 courses of intravenous ciprofloxacin therapy, administered to 1,869 patients in 59 clinical trials, were analyzed for drug safety. The 985 men and 884 women had a mean age of 50 years, and more than one third were over 60 years of age. An overwhelming majority had at least one accompanying systemic illness, and the condition of more than half the patients was only fair or poor at the onset of therapy. Ciprofloxacin was administered in a unit dose of either 200 mg (68 percent of the patients) or 300 mg (28 percent) by intravenous infusion, generally over 30 minutes every 12 hours, at a mean daily dosage of 456 mg. The duration of intravenous therapy ranged from one to 57 days, with a mean of seven days; over 1,000 patients were treated for more than five days. Adverse events considered probably or possibly related to intravenous ciprofloxacin were reported in 15.8 percent of the courses; therapy was discontinued prematurely in 3 percent. Local reactions at the site of infusion were the most common, occurring in 4.4 percent of the courses. Changes in blood chemistry values (4.1 percent) included increases in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase. Reports of adverse effects referable to the gastrointestinal tract (3.0 percent) were primarily nausea and diarrhea. Central nervous system reactions (1.8 percent) included convulsive seizures, headache, and dizziness. In comparative trials, events considered probably or possibly drug related were reported for 17.3 and 13.6 percent of the ciprofloxacin- and ceftazidime-treated patients, respectively. The incidence of adverse events other than local reactions at the infusion site was not significantly different between the ciprofloxacin- and ceftazidime-treated patients (12.7 percent versus 11.0 percent, p greater than 0.2).

A survey of clinical experience with ciprofloxacin, a new quinolone antimicrobial.

Ciprofloxacin is a new quinolone antimicrobial agent with activity against a broad spectrum of gram-negative and gram-positive organisms, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci. The efficacy and safety results of 80 clinical studies of the oral form of ciprofloxacin are reported. Drug safety was assessed in 2236 courses in 2203 adult patients treated primarily in the United States. Data from 1676 courses were suitable for analysis of drug efficacy. The unit dose for most patients ranged from 250 mg to 750 mg (median, 500 mg), usually given every 12 hours. The duration of treatment ranged from 3 to 231 days (median, 10 days). Predominant among 1722 infections were those of the urinary tract (43%), skin structures (29%), and respiratory tract (19%); the remainder were bone and joint infections (5%), bacteremias (2%), and intra-abdominal (1%), gastrointestinal (1%), and pelvic infections (less than 1%). Signs and symptoms of infection resolved in 79% of all cases; a further 15% improved, and 5% failed to improve. Pathogens were eradicated in 89% of urinary tract infections and persisted in 5%; 80% of patients still had sterile urine at the 3-to 6-week follow-up. In 81% of nonurinary tract infections, pathogens were eradicated; they persisted in 11%, and superinfection occurred in less than 5%. After treatment, 89% of the 2253 causative organisms were eradicated and 2% were reduced to clinically insignificant counts; 8% persisted. Of 411 isolates of P. aeruginosa, 77% were eradicated, as were 97% of 421 Escherichia coli and 80% of 248 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Also eradicated were 95% of 166 Klebsiella, 96% of 139 Proteus mirabilis, 100% of 20 other Proteus, 94% of 123 Enterobacter, 100% of 68 Haemophilus influenzae, 96% of 49 Citrobacter, 89% of 45 Serratia, 95% of 41 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 91% of 43 Salmonella, 100% of 38 Morganella morganii, and 100% of 35 Providencia isolates. Adverse reactions were judged probably or possibly drug-related in 14.8% of courses; drug treatment had to be stopped prematurely in 3.5%. The most frequent reactions were gastrointestinal complaints (chiefly nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting), metabolic disorders (elevated SGOT, SGPT, serum creatinine, or blood urea nitrogen), and nervous system effects (dizziness, light-headedness, restlessness, tremor, and headache). Crystalluria, judged to be related to ciprofloxacin, occurred in two patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Ciprofloxacin: an update on clinical experience.

This report presents the results of 146 clinical trials of the oral form of ciprofloxacin, a new quinolone antimicrobial agent active against a broad spectrum of gram-negative and gram-positive organisms, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci. The safety of ciprofloxacin was assessed in 2,829 patients, most of whom were treated in the United States, and the analysis of efficacy was based on data from 3,981 patients evaluated through June 1986. In general, the patients received ciprofloxacin at a dosage of 250 to 750 mg every 12 hours; the median dose was 500 mg twice daily. Dose-ranging studies in male patients with urinary tract infections indicated that a regimen of 500 or 750 mg twice daily was not substantially more effective than a regimen of 250 mg twice daily. Forty-four double-blind, controlled trials were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of oral ciprofloxacin with those of standard therapeutic agents in the treatment of infections of the urinary tract, skin and skin structure, respiratory tract, and bone. Ciprofloxacin at 250 mg twice daily was as effective as trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at 160/800 mg twice daily in the treatment of urinary tract infections. Orally administered ciprofloxacin in a regimen of 750 mg twice daily was shown to be as effective as cefotaxime administered intravenously at 2 g three times daily in the treatment of infections of the skin and skin structure. When compared with ampicillin for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, ciprofloxacin was as effective in resolving or improving markedly the signs and symptoms of infection and eradicated a higher percentage of causative organisms. Adverse reactions considered probably or possibly related to the drug were reported for 16.2 percent of the patients treated; most were of only mild or moderate intensity and resolved after therapy was completed. Emergence of resistant organisms associated with ciprofloxacin therapy has been reported infrequently.

Clinical experience with ciprofloxacin in the USA.

This interim analysis of the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin is based on case reports of 1241 adult patients treated primarily in the USA; 1026 were suitable for analysis of drug efficacy. The daily dose ranged from 500 to 1500 mg, the unit dose being given every 12 h. Duration of treatment ranged from 5 to 211 days (mean 12.6 days). In 1046 cases of infection the site was the urinary tract (514), skin structures (218), respiratory tract (215), blood (43), bone (27), abdomen (13), gastrointestinal tract (13) and pelvis (3). Organisms responsible for infection were Escherichia coli (282), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (238), Staphylococcus spp. (149), Streptococcus spp. (107), Klebsiella spp. (105), Proteus spp. (97), Haemophilus spp. (71), Enterobacter spp. (58), Salmonella spp. (44), Citrobacter spp. (27), and Serratia spp. (22). Signs and symptoms of infection resolved in 84% of all cases; 12.6% improved and 3.4% failed to improve. Pathogens were eradicated in 91% of urinary tract infections and in 87% of all other cases of infection combined; superinfections occurred in 5.3% of all patients. At the four-week follow-up 83% of patients with urinary tract infection still had sterile urine. Adverse reactions during therapy were considered probably or possibly drug-related in 166 patients. Nausea (37), diarrhea (25), vomiting (15), nervousness (28), and rash (9) were the most frequent; in only 2% of cases was it necessary to discontinue the drug. Results of ophthalmologic studies were generally unremarkable. Occasional elevations of SGOT and SGPT, and rare elevations of NPN related to ciprofloxacin therapy were seen.