ABSTRACT
The leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world is ischemic heart disease. Physical activity is a major approach in prevention and therapy of cardiac diseases. Self-heart-rate-monitoring in daily life is an important point for health awareness of cardiac patients. Aim of this study was validation of measurement accuracy of seven different devices against ECG-monitoring during cardiac rehabilitation training on a bicycle ergometer. Tested devices were: Garmin Forerunner 35 (Garmin), Mio Fuse (Mio), Fitbit Charge HR (FitbitHR), Fitbit Surge (FitbitS), Withings Pulse™ Ox (Withings), Apple Watch Series 1 (Apple) and Pearl Fitness-Tracker (FBT-50.HR PRO.V4). All devices were tested on 35 participants with six timed measurements during 20 minutes constant load bicycle ergometer workout for each. Simultaneousely, ECG measurements were recorded. Pearson´s correlations were assessed. Apple, Mio, and Garmin showed excellent accuracy with close correlation to ECG for self-monitoring of heart rate (HR) during cycling. FitbitHR, Pearl and FitbitS presented reasonable results. In contrast, Withings showed poor correlation to ECG with significant differences. We found significant differences between the tested devices. Since accuracy is of major importance for cardiac patients, only Apple, Mio and Garmin could be recommended. However, further research within distinct clinical and non-clinical settings is necessary and should take different types of physical activities into account.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Rehabilitation , Electrocardiography , Exercise , Fitness Trackers , Heart Rate , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Eighty-four outpatients treated for epilepsy with complex partial seizures were followed up 18 years later. RESULTS: Of these Patients, 35% showed stabile learning disabilities when they were first treated and also 18 years later. These Patients did not achieve a regular school qualification. Forty-eight percent suffered from a psychiatric disorder as classified by the ICD-10. Children with a pathological neurological result in the first examination showed poorer cognitive outcomes than Patients with only mild neurological impairment. The age of onset of the disease did not significantly predict subsequent cognitive abilities. Patients who showed complex partial seizures and generalized seizures showed poorer cognitive outcomes, as did Patients with a psychiatric disorder or psychosocial problems. DISCUSSION: The study points to the importance of a conjoint neurological and psychiatric treatment to deal with the different impairments and corresponding developmental course of the disease.
