SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination is not associated with the induction of anti-HLA or non-HLA antibodies.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is strongly recommended in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and dialysis patients. Whether these vaccinations may trigger alloantibodies, is still debated. METHODS: In the current study we evaluated the effect of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines on anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) and 60 anti-non-HLA antibody profiles in clinically stable KTR and dialysis patients. In total, we included 28 KTR, 30 patients on haemodialysis, 25 patients on peritoneal dialysis and 31 controls with a positive seroresponse 16-21 days after the first dose of either the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine. Both anti-HLA and anti-non-HLA antibodies were determined prior to vaccination and 21 to 35 days after the second vaccine dose. RESULTS: Overall, the proportion of patients with detectable anti-HLA antibodies was similar before and after vaccination (class I 14% vs. 16%, p = 0.48; class II 25% before and after vaccination). After vaccination, there was no pattern in 1) additionally detected anti-HLA antibodies, or 2) the levels of pre-existing ones. Additional anti-non-HLA antibodies were detected in 30% of the patients, ranging from 1 to 5 new anti-non-HLA antibodies per patient. However, the clinical significance of anti-non-HLA antibodies is still a matter of debate. To date, only a significant association has been found for anti-non-HLA ARHGDIB antibodies and long-term kidney graft loss. No additionally developed anti-ARHGDIB antibodies or elevated level of existing anti-ARHGDIB antibodies was observed. CONCLUSION: The current data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination does not induce anti-HLA or anti-non-HLA antibodies, corroborating the importance of vaccinating KTR and dialysis patients.

The Pre-Transplant Non-HLA Antibody Burden Associates With the Development of Histology of Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Many kidney allografts fail due to the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), related to donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA). However, the histology of ABMR can also be observed in patients without HLA-DSA. While some non-HLA antibodies have been related to the histology of ABMR, it is not well known to what extent they contribute to kidney allograft injury. Here we aimed to investigate the role of 82 different non-HLA antibodies in the occurrence of histology of ABMR after kidney transplantation. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2004-2013 in a single center and had biobanked serum. Pre- and post-transplant sera (n=2870) were retrospectively tested for the presence of 82 different non-HLA antibodies using a prototype bead assay on Luminex (Immucor, Inc). A ratio was calculated between the measured MFI value and the cut-off MFI defined by the vendor for each non-HLA target. RESULTS: 874 patients had available pretransplant sera and were included in this analysis. Of them, 133 (15.2%) received a repeat kidney allograft, and 100 (11.4%) had pretransplant HLA-DSA. In total, 204 (23.3%) patients developed histology of ABMR after kidney transplantation. In 79 patients (38.7%) the histology of ABMR was explained by pretransplant or de novo HLA-DSA. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed that only the broadly non-HLA sensitized (number of positive non-HLA antibodies) patients and those with the highest total strength of the non-HLA antibodies (total ratios of the positive non-HLA antibodies) were independently associated with increased rates of histology of ABMR after transplantation. Additionally, independent associations were found for antibodies against TUBB (HR=2.40; 95% CI 1.37 - 4.21, p=0.002), Collagen III (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.08 - 2.58, p=0.02), VCL (HR=2.04; 95% CI 1.12 - 3.71, p=0.02) and STAT6 (HR=1.47; 95% CI 1.01 - 2.15, p=0.04). The overall posttransplant non-HLA autoreactivity was not associated with increased rates of ABMRh. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients highly and broadly sensitized against non-HLA targets are associated with an increased risk of ABMR histology after kidney transplantations in the absence of HLA-DSA. Also, some pretransplant non-HLA autoantibodies are individually associated with increased rates of ABMR histology. However, whether these associations are clinically relevant and represent causality, warrants further studies.

Major histocompatibility complex class 1 chain-related antigen a antibodies: sensitizing events and impact on renal graft outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Major histocompatibility complex class 1 chain-related antigen A (MICA) antibodies (Abs) have been associated with renal graft loss in one large cohort. The triggering factors for MICA Abs and their autologous or allogeneic specificity have not been well defined. More data on the impact of MICA on renal grafts outcome are needed. METHODS: We tested sera from 494 controls and 597 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for MICA using Luminex. Forty CKD MICA+ patients were genotyped for MICA alleles to determine their auto- or allospecificity. We compared MICA+ with MICA- renal transplant recipients with regard to acute rejection episodes and long-term survival. RESULTS: Blood transfusions, previous transplantation, and more than two pregnancies were independent risk factors for the presence of MICA Abs, as were CKD stage V status and male gender. Among the 40 genotyped patients, allo-Abs alone were present in 32 patients, both auto- and allo-Abs in 4 patients, and auto-Abs alone in 4 patients. When we compared MICA+ with MICA- patients, the incidence of acute rejection episodes during the first year (10.2% vs. 12.8%), as well as 1-year creatinine and proteinuria, were similar in both groups. At 10 years, actuarial patient (97.8% vs. 87.6%) and overall graft survival (76% vs. 72%) were similar between MICA+ and MICA- patients. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, (1) sensitizing events for MICA Abs are the same as for human leukocyte antigen Abs; (2) MICA Abs did not adversely affect renal graft outcomes in our cohort.