Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Obes Facts ; 4(6): 449-55, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22248995

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate fruit and vegetable (FV) intake levels of US adult population and evaluate the association between FV intake and BMI status after controlling for confounding demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. We also sought to identify moderating factors. METHODS: We used 2007 Behavior Risk Factors Surveillance System (N > 400,000) data. FV intake was dichotomized as ≥5 servings (FV5+) versus <5 servings/ day. BMI status was categorized as normal, overweight, and obese. Identification of moderators was performed by testing interactions between BMI status and other variables using bivariate analyses followed by multiple logistic regression analysis incorporating complex survey sampling design features. RESULTS: Only 24.6% of US adults consumed ≥5 servings per day and less than 4% consumed 9 or more servings. Overweight (% FV5+ = 23.9%) and obese (21.9%) groups consumed significantly less FV than the normal-weight (27.4%) group (p < 0.0001). This inverse association remained significant even after controlling for potential confounding factors. Multivariate analysis identified five significant moderators (p < 0.0001) after controlling for all evaluated variables: race, sex, smoking status, health coverage, and physical activity. Notably, physically inactive obese males tended to consume the least FV (% FV5+ = 14.7%). CONCLUSION: Current US population FV intake level is below recommended levels. The inverse association between FV intake and obesity was significant and was moderated by demographic, socioeconomic status, and lifestyle factors. These factors should be considered when developing policies and interventions to increase FV intake.


Subject(s)
Diet , Feeding Behavior , Fruit , Health Behavior , Obesity/etiology , Overweight/etiology , Vegetables , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet/standards , Diet Surveys , Exercise , Female , Humans , Life Style , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Obesity/epidemiology , Overweight/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Steroids ; 73(4): 430-40, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18241900

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to develop a quantitative and in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach to investigate the muscle growth effects of anabolic steroids. A protocol of MRI acquisition on a standard clinical 1.5 T scanner and quantitative image analysis was established and employed to measure the individual muscle and organ volumes in the intact and castrated guinea pigs undergoing a 16-week treatment protocol by two well-documented anabolic steroids, testosterone and nandrolone, via implanted silastic capsules. High correlations between the in vivo MRI and postmortem dissection measurements were observed for shoulder muscle complex (R=0.86), masseter (R=0.79), temporalis (R=0.95), neck muscle complex (R=0.58), prostate gland and seminal vesicles (R=0.98), and testis (R=0.96). Furthermore, the longitudinal MRI measurements yielded adequate sensitivity to detect the restoration of growth to or towards normal in castrated guinea pigs by replacing circulating steroid levels to physiological or slightly higher levels, as expected. These results demonstrated that quantitative MRI using a standard clinical scanner provides accurate and sensitive measurement of individual muscles and organs, and this in vivo MRI protocol in conjunction with the castrated guinea pig model constitutes an effective platform to investigate the longitudinal and cross-sectional growth effects of other potential anabolic steroids. The quantitative MRI protocol developed can also be readily adapted for human studies on most clinical MRI scanner to investigate the anabolic steroid growth effects, or monitor the changes in individual muscle and organ volume and geometry following injury, strength training, neuromuscular disorders, and pharmacological or surgical interventions.


Subject(s)
Anabolic Agents/pharmacology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Muscles/drug effects , Steroids/pharmacology , Animals , Male , Muscles/anatomy & histology , Nandrolone/pharmacology , Organ Size/drug effects , Swine , Testosterone/pharmacology
3.
D.F; McGraw Hill; 2 ed; 2007. 523 p.
Monography in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-871340
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...