Chest CT in the evaluation of child abuse - When is it useful?

BACKGROUND: Indications for chest CT in evaluation of child abuse are unknown. OBJECTIVE: Determine which groups of children can best benefit from chest CT. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 10-year (1/2010 to 12/2019) retrospective study of children <3 years who had chest CT within 3 days of the initial skeletal survey. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information were obtained from medical records. Two pediatric radiologists reviewed, independently and blinded to clinical information, anonymized rib X-rays (initial and follow up when available) and chest CT. Disagreements were resolved by a third pediatric radiologist. Agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. Number and percentage of fractures were analyzed by negative binomial models and chi-square tests, respectively. RESULTS: 50 children (21 females) with average age of 9.7 months, 27 of whom had follow-up radiography. Agreement on initial and follow-up X-rays was substantial (k = 0.72) and perfect (k = 1.00), respectively, and almost perfect (k = 0.82) for CT scans. Chest CT demonstrated more fractures than X-ray, both initially (112 vs. 42, p < 0.0001) and at follow-up (93 vs. 49, p < 0.0001). Significantly more additional fractures were found at CT (11/13, 84.6 %) in patients with positive than in those with negative initial surveys (7/37, 18.9 %, p < 0.001). Ten initial surveys had only indeterminate fractures; four of them had fractures and six had no fractures on CT. Chest CT missed one patient (1/27, 3.7 %) with acute nondisplaced anterior rib fractures. CONCLUSION: Chest CT can be considered in children with negative skeletal survey and high clinical suspicion for child abuse, and when the diagnosis of rib fractures is indeterminate.

Radiologists' Diagnostic Performance in Differentiation of Rickets and Classic Metaphyseal Lesions on Radiographs: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND. Despite evidence supporting the specificity of classic metaphyseal lesions (CML) for the diagnosis of child abuse, some medicolegal practitioners claim that CML result from rickets rather than trauma. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiating rickets and CML on radiographs. METHODS. This retrospective seven-center study included children younger than 2 years who underwent knee radiography from January 2007 to December 2018 and who had either rickets (25-hydroxyvitamin D level < 20 ng/mL and abnormal knee radiographs) or knee CML and a diagnosis of child abuse from a child abuse pediatrician. Additional injuries were identified through medical record review. Radiographs were cropped and zoomed to present similar depictions of the knee. Eight radiologists independently interpreted radiographs for diagnoses of rickets or CML, rated confidence levels, and recorded associated radiographic signs. RESULTS. Seventy children (27 girls, 43 boys) had rickets; 77 children (37 girls, 40 boys) had CML. Children with CML were younger than those with rickets (mean, 3.7 vs 14.2 months, p < .001; 89.6% vs 5.7% younger than 6 months; 3.9% vs 65.7% older than 1 year). All children with CML had injuries in addition to the knee CML identified at physical examination or other imaging examinations. Radiologists had almost perfect agreement for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations of rickets (κ = 0.92) and CML (κ = 0.89). Across radiologists, estimated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CML for moderate- or high-confidence interpretations were 95.1%, 97.0%, and 96.0%. Accuracy was not significantly different between pediatric and nonpediatric radiologists (p = .20) or between less experienced and more experienced radiologists (p = .57). Loss of metaphyseal zone of provisional calcification, cupping, fraying, and physeal widening were more common in rickets than CML, being detected in less than 4% of children with CML. Corner fracture, bucket-handle fracture, subphyseal lucency, deformed corner, metaphyseal irregularity, and subperiosteal new bone formation were more common in CML than rickets, being detected in less than 4% of children with rickets. CONCLUSION. Radiologists had high interobserver agreement and high diagnostic performance for differentiating rickets and CML. Recognition that CML mostly occur in children younger than 6 months and are unusual in children older than 1 year may assist interpretation. CLINICAL IMPACT. Rickets and CML have distinct radiographic signs, and radiologists can reliably differentiate these two entities.

Whole-Spine MRI in Children With Suspected Abusive Head Trauma.

BACKGROUND. Abusive head trauma (AHT) in children has recently been associated with findings on cervical spine MRI. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether whole-spine MRI in children with suspected AHT shows additional abnormalities not identified on cervical spine MRI. METHODS. This retrospective study included 256 children younger than 3 years old (170 boys, 86 girls; mean age, 5.9 months) who underwent skeletal survey and head MRI for suspected child abuse from January 2019 to December 2020. Per institutional protocol, children with suspected AHT also underwent whole-spine MRI. AHT diagnoses were established by a combination of clinical information from medical record review and injuries described in reports from skeletal survey, head MRI, and head CT (if performed). Two pediatric neuroradiologists independently reviewed whole-spine MRI examinations for presence and level of intraspinal hemorrhage (classified as subarachnoid, subdural, or epidural), ligamentous injury, spinal cord edema, and vertebral fractures; subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, ligamentous injury, and fracture unidentified by skeletal survey were considered major findings. Interobserver agreement was assessed; a third radiologist resolved discrepancies. Findings were summarized with attention to injuries isolated to the thoracolumbar spine. RESULTS. A total of 148 of 256 (57.8%) children underwent whole-spine MRI. AHT was diagnosed in 79 of 148 (53.4%) children who underwent whole-spine MRI versus in 2 of 108 (1.9%) who did not undergo whole-spine MRI (p < .001). Interobserver agreement, expressed as kappa coefficient, was 0.90 for intraspinal hemorrhage, 0.69 for ligamentous injury, 0.66 for spinal cord edema, and 0.95 for fracture. A total of 57 of 148 (38.5%) whole-spine MRI examinations showed injuries, and 34 of 148 (23.0%) showed injuries localized to the thoracolumbar spine. A total of 47 of 148 (31.8%) whole-spine MRI examinations showed major findings, of which 24 (51.1%) were localized to the thoracolumbar spine. Isolated thoracolumbar injuries included 23 of 34 spinal subdural hematomas, 2 of 3 spinal epidural hematomas, and 9 of 11 vertebral fractures, including five fractures not identified by skeletal survey. Diagnosis of AHT was more common in children with positive, versus negative, whole-spine MRI examinations (76.8% vs 39.1%; p < .001). CONCLUSION. In children with suspected AHT, whole-spine MRI commonly shows isolated thoracolumbar injuries. CLINICAL IMPACT. The results support performing whole-spine MRI rather than cervical spine MRI in children with suspected AHT.

Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of classic metaphyseal lesions using radiographs as the gold standard.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of classic metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) in children suspected for child abuse can be challenging. Ultrasound (US) can potentially help diagnose CMLs. However, its accuracy is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of US in the diagnosis of CMLs using skeletal survey reports as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: US of the metaphysis was performed in three patient groups age <1 year. Informed consent was obtained for patients scheduled for renal US (Group 1) and for patients scheduled for skeletal surveys for possible child abuse (Group 2). Targeted US was also performed in selected patients to evaluate for possible CML suspected on radiographs (Group 3). In Groups 1 and 2, US was performed of both distal femurs, and of either the right or left proximal and distal tibia. Two radiologists (Rad1 and Rad2) independently reviewed the US studies, blinded to history and other imaging. US sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the following gold standards: CML definitely seen on skeletal survey (positive), CML definitely not seen on skeletal survey or part of renal US group (negative). Cases where the skeletal survey was indeterminate for CML were excluded. Kappa statistics were used to evaluate interobserver variability. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-one metaphyseal sites were evaluated by US in 63 children (mean age: 5 months; 33 males); 34 had skeletal surveys and 29 had renal US. Kappa for the presence of CML was 0.70 with 95.7% agreement. US sensitivity was 55.0% and 63.2% and the specificity was 97.7% and 96.7% for Rad1 and Rad2, respectively. CONCLUSION: US has low sensitivity and high specificity in CML diagnosis. Thus, negative US does not exclude CML, but when the radiographs are equivocal, positive US can help substantiate the diagnosis.

Consultations in Child Abuse Pediatrics.

This study describes a hospital-based child abuse pediatrics consultation service. Medical records for all child abuse pediatrics consultations during 2006 to 2009 were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Of 2495 consultations, 13 were excluded due to insufficient information, 1682 were examinations for suspected sexual abuse, and 800 were examinations for nonsexual abuse concerns. Among the latter group of 800 patients, the most common reasons for consultation were fracture (33.5%), nonburn skin injury (16.8%), burn (15.4%), and intracranial injury (13.2%). Median patient age was 11 months (range = 3 days to 16 years). Case fatality rate was 3.9%. Final diagnosis was classified as definite/likely abuse in 40.0%, questionable/unknown in 24.5%, definite/likely accident in 23.6%, no injury in 4.6%, neglect in 4.0%, and a medical condition in 3.2%. Therefore, among consultations requested for suspected child maltreatment, a child abuse pediatrician concluded that abuse was definite or likely in less than half of patients.

Establishing signs for acute and healing phases of distal tibial classic metaphyseal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Stages of healing for classic metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are not well established. Follow-up skeletal surveys provide an opportunity to evaluate signs of healing CMLs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sequence of CML healing phases by comparing initial and follow-up skeletal surveys in children with distal tibial CMLs on the initial survey. Findings could assist in child abuse investigations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all distal tibia CMLs with initial and follow-up skeletal surveys performed January 2009 through December 2018 at our institution. Two pediatric radiologists reviewed the surveys using Likert score from 1 (no CML) to 5 (definite CML). Only cases with score of 4 or 5 by both radiologists were selected for the study. The initial and 2-week follow-up skeletal surveys were reviewed in consensus for presence of the following signs: corner fracture, thin bucket handle fracture, thick bucket handle fracture, bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap, subphyseal lucency, deformed corner, and subperiosteal new bone formation. We used the Kruskal-Wallis test to evaluate for significant difference in thickness among thin bucket handle fracture, thick bucket handle fracture, and bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap. RESULTS: We included 26 children (12 girls) with age range 1-9.9 months who had a combined 34 distal tibia CMLs. Thin bucket handle fracture (n=13, 38.2%) was only seen on initial survey. On follow-up, six children had thick bucket handle fracture and four had bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap. Fourteen thick bucket handle fractures (n=9) or bucket handle fractures with endochondral bone filling the gap (n=5) were noted on initial surveys; on follow-up, three (21.4%) had deformed corner, one (7.1%) had corner fracture, one (7.1%) had subphyseal lucency, and five (35.7%) were normal. None demonstrated thin bucket handle fracture on follow-up. Two of the nine (22.2%) thick bucket handle fractures became thicker, and 3/9 (33.3%) became bucket handle fractures with endochondral bone filling the gap. The metaphysis normalized in 8/34 (23.5%) CMLs on follow-up surveys. The thickness of thin bucket handle fracture was less than 1 mm (mean±standard deviation [SD] = 0.6±0.2 mm), which was significantly thinner (P<0.0001) compared with thick bucket handle fracture (1.7±0.5 mm) and bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap (1.9±0.6 mm). CONCLUSION: The lack of thin bucket handle fractures on any follow-up skeletal surveys suggests this sign represents an acute phase of injury. The next phases of healing appear to be thick bucket handle fracture followed by bucket handle fracture with endochondral bone filling the gap. It is important to note that normalization of the metaphysis at 2-week follow-up does not exclude CML because this was seen in about one-fifth of cases.

Compliance With Skeletal Surveys for Child Abuse in General Hospitals: A Statewide Quality Improvement Process.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to perform a statewide quality improvement process to improve compliance with the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines in performing skeletal surveys for suspected child abuse. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively identified all outside hospital skeletal surveys for suspected child abuse in children younger than 3 years referred to our tertiary children's hospital in 2016-2017. We included a 3-month baseline and 21-month intervention period. The quality improvement process was based on sending educational material to all ACR member radiologists in the state and making telephone calls to radiology technologist team leaders whenever the surveys were not compliant, followed by e-mails with guidance on performing skeletal surveys. We documented the views obtained and compared them with the ACR guidelines. The percentage of compliance with each individual view was assessed with the chi-square test. The total number of compliant views per survey was evaluated with ANOVA. RESULTS. Two hundred twenty-seven patients (105 female) with a mean age of 0.8 year (SD, 0.67 year; range, 0.01-3 years) were evaluated. These 227 surveys (baseline, n = 27; postintervention, n = 200) were performed at 69 different outside hospitals. Compliance significantly (p = 0.006) improved from 25.9% (7/27) during baseline to 54.0% (108/200) after intervention. There was a nonsignificant trend of improved compliance between the first (51.9%; 41/79) and last 7-month (62.3%; 33/53) periods of intervention. Among individual views, only rib oblique views showed significantly (p = 0.02) improved compliance after the intervention, from 51.9% (14/27) to 73.5% (147/200). CONCLUSION. The compliance rate with ACR guidelines for skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse at outside general hospitals significantly increased after implementation of a quality improvement process.

Ultrasound findings in classic metaphyseal lesions: emphasis on the metaphyseal bone collar and zone of provisional calcification.

BACKGROUND: The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is highly specific for non-accidental trauma in infants. While the radiographic findings are well documented, there is little literature on the ultrasound (US) appearance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate US findings in CMLs identified on radiographs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, retrospective evaluation of targeted US of CMLs was performed in selected groups of children from 2014 to 2017. Only CMLs confidently identified on radiography by a consensus of two radiologists were included. US images were obtained with a linear transducer, including longitudinal images at lateral, anterior, medial and posterior aspects. Two pediatric radiologists evaluated the US appearance, specifically the metaphyseal bone collar for thickness, deformity and fracture, as well as the sonographic zone of provisional calcification for irregularity and appearance of multiple lines. Radiography was the reference standard. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (13 female; mean age: 4.2 months) were identified, with 39 CMLs in the tibia (n=22), femur (n=11), humerus (n=3), radius (n=2) and fibula (n=1). Thirty-three of the 39 CMLs (85%) were identified on US, while 6 (15%) were not seen (false negatives). Thirty of the 39 (77%) had metaphyseal bone collar thickening, 29 (74%) had collar deformity and 12 (31%) had visible fracture of the collar. At the sonographic zone of provisional calcification, 16/39 (41%) had irregularity and 5 (13%) had multiple lines visible. CONCLUSION: Identifying metaphyseal bone collar and zone of provisional calcification abnormalities is key to recognizing CMLs on US. While additional studies are necessary to evaluate the accuracy of US in the diagnosis of CMLs, our findings suggest US may have a potential role in either confirming or evaluating radiographically equivocal/occult CMLs.

The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys.

BACKGROUND: Fractures are the second most common finding in non-accidental trauma after cutaneous signs. Interpreting skeletal surveys could be challenging as some fractures are subtle and due to anatomical variations that can mimic injuries. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a second read by a pediatric radiologist of skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma initially read at referring hospitals by general radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2016 and 2017, we identified all patients referred to our children's hospital with previous surveys performed and read at a community hospital by an outside radiologist. We excluded patients older than 3 years and studies performed at a children's hospital. The surveys were reviewed by a pediatric radiologist with the printed outside report available. Surveys with disagreement between outside read and pediatric radiologist read were reviewed by a second pediatric radiologist. A disagreement in the second read included only definite discrepant findings agreed upon by both pediatric radiologists. The Fisher exact test was performed to compare the ratio of discrepancies between readers in normal and abnormal surveys. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five surveys were performed (120 male) at 62 referring hospitals, with a mean patient age of 10.5 months (range: 5 days-3 years). The outside read identified fractures in 104/225 (46.2%) surveys. Thirty-seven of the 225 (16.4%) contained discrepancies in interpretation (n=111). Most of these disagreements (29/37, 78.4%) resulted in a significant change in the report. There was a significant (P<0.0001) difference between disagreement rate in outside read negative (4/111, 3.2%) and positive surveys (34/104, 31.7%). The second read identified additional fractures in 22/225 (9.8%) of the surveys and disagreed with first-read fractures in 17/256 (7.6%). Four of 19 (21.1%) classic metaphyseal lesions diagnosed by the outside read were normal variants; 18 classic metaphyseal lesions were missed by the outside read. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports second reads by pediatric radiologists of skeletal surveys for non-accidental trauma.

Radiologic head CT interpretation errors in pediatric abusive and non-abusive head trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric head trauma, including abusive head trauma, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to identify and evaluate radiologic interpretation errors of head CTs performed on abusive and non-abusive pediatric head trauma patients from a community setting referred for a secondary interpretation at a tertiary pediatric hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search identified 184 patients <5 years of age with head CT for known or potential head trauma who had a primary interpretation performed at a referring community hospital by a board-certified radiologist. Two board-certified fellowship-trained neuroradiologists at an academic pediatric hospital independently interpreted the head CTs, compared their interpretations to determine inter-reader discrepancy rates, and resolved discrepancies to establish a consensus second interpretation. The primary interpretation was compared to the consensus second interpretation using the RADPEER™ scoring system to determine the primary interpretation-second interpretation overall and major discrepancy rates. MRI and/or surgical findings were used to validate the primary interpretation or second interpretation when possible. The diagnosis of abusive head trauma was made using clinical and imaging data by a child abuse specialist to separate patients into abusive head trauma and non-abusive head trauma groups. Discrepancy rates were compared for both groups. Lastly, primary interpretations and second interpretations were evaluated for discussion of imaging findings concerning for abusive head trauma. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between primary interpretation-second interpretation versus inter-reader overall and major discrepancy rates (28% vs. 6%, P=0.0001; 16% vs. 1%, P=0.0001). There were significant differences in the primary interpretation-second interpretation overall and major discrepancy rates for abusive head trauma patients compared to non-abusive head trauma patients (41% vs 23%, P=0.02; 26% vs. 12%, P=0.03). The most common findings resulting in major radiologic interpretation errors were fractures and subdural hemorrhage. Differences in the age of the patient and the percentage of patients with hemorrhage were statistically significant between the abusive head trauma versus non-abusive head trauma groups, while no statistical difference was identified for skull fractures, ischemia, head CT radiation dose, or presence of multiplanar or 3-D reformatted images. The second interpretation more frequently indicated potential for abusive head trauma compared to the primary interpretation (P=0.0001). MRI and/or surgical findings were in agreement with the second interpretation in 29/29 (100%) of patients with discrepancies. CONCLUSION: A high incidence of radiologic interpretation errors may occur in pediatric trauma patients at risk for abusive head trauma who are referred from a community hospital. This suggests value for second interpretations of head CTs at a tertiary pediatric hospital for this patient population.

Double-read of skeletal surveys in suspected non-accidental trauma: what we learned.

BACKGROUND: Missing a fracture in a child on skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma can have devastating results. Double-read has the potential to improve fracture detection. However the yield of double-read is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the advantage of double-read versus single-read of radiographic skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed in two phases. In the first phase (April 2013 to September 2013), double-read was performed for all skeletal surveys obtained during weekday working hours. Because we had no new double-read findings in studies initially read as negative, we conducted a second phase (January 2014 to March 2014). In the second phase we limited double-reads to skeletal surveys found positive on the first read. At the end of this period, we retrospectively performed double-read for all initially negative skeletal surveys. We excluded follow-up skeletal surveys. The difference in discrepancy (new fracture or false diagnosis of a fracture) ratio between negative and positive skeletal surveys was evaluated using the Fisher exact test, and change in discrepancy ratio between the first and second study phases was evaluated using the stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: Overall in the two phases, 178 skeletal surveys were performed in 178 children (67 girls) with mean age of 9 months (range 3 days to 3.7 years). Double-read found 16 discrepancies in 8/178 (4.5%) skeletal surveys. Seven of these studies showed additional fractures (n=15). In one study, an initial read of a skull fracture was read as a variant on the second read. There was a significant (P=0.01) difference between rate of disagreement in negative skeletal surveys (1/104, 1.0%) and positive skeletal surveys (7/74, 9.5%). No significant change in disagreement rate was demonstrated between the two phases of the study (P=0.59). CONCLUSION: Double-read of skeletal survey for suspected non-accidental trauma found false-negative fractures in a few cases and rarely found false-positive diagnosis of a fracture. Double-read uncommonly found discrepancies in an initially normal skeletal survey. Limiting double-read to initially positive studies improves the yield of the double-read.

The prevalence of uncommon fractures on skeletal surveys performed to evaluate for suspected abuse in 930 children: should practice guidelines change?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and site of fractures detected on skeletal surveys performed for suspected child abuse at a tertiary children's hospital and to determine whether any survey images may be eliminated without affecting clinical care or the ability to make a diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all skeletal surveys performed for suspected abuse from 2003 to 2009 of children younger than 2 years. Repeated studies were excluded, as were studies not performed to evaluate for suspected abuse. From the reports, we documented the sites of all the fractures. RESULTS. Nine hundred thirty children (515 boys and 415 girls) with a median age of 6 months met the entry criteria for the study. Fractures were detected in 317 children (34%), of whom 166 (18%) had multiple fractures. The most common sites for fractures were the long bones (21%), ribs (10%), skull (7%), and clavicle (2%). Ten children (1%) had fractures in the spine (n = 3), pelvis (n = 1), hands (n = 6), and feet (n = 2). All 10 children had other signs of physical abuse. CONCLUSION: In skeletal surveys performed for suspected child abuse, fractures limited to sites other than the long bones, ribs, skull, and clavicles are rare. The additional radiation exposure and cost of obtaining radiographs of the spine, pelvis, hands, and feet may outweigh their potential benefit. Given the rarity of fractures of the spine, pelvis, hands, and feet, consideration may be given to eliminating those views from routine skeletal surveys performed to evaluate for suspected child abuse.

Maltreatment of children with disabilities.

Widespread efforts are being made to increase awareness and provide education to pediatricians regarding risk factors of child abuse and neglect. The purpose of this clinical report is to ensure that children with disabilities are recognized as a population that is also at risk of maltreatment. Some conditions related to a disability can be confused with maltreatment. The need for early recognition and intervention of child abuse and neglect in this population, as well as the ways that a medical home can facilitate the prevention and early detection of child maltreatment, are the subject of this report.