What is the environmental impact of a blood transfusion? A life cycle assessment of transfusion services across England.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare activities significantly contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Blood transfusions require complex, interlinked processes to collect, manufacture, and supply. Their contribution to healthcare emissions and avenues for mitigation is unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a life cycle assessment (LCA) for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions across England where 1.36 million units are transfused annually. We defined the process flow with seven categories: donation, transportation, manufacturing, testing, stockholding, hospital transfusion, and disposal. We used direct measurements, manufacturer data, bioengineering databases, and surveys to assess electrical power usage, embodied carbon in disposable materials and reagents, and direct emissions through transportation, refrigerant leakage, and disposal. RESULTS: The central estimate of carbon footprint per unit of RBC transfused was 7.56 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2eq). The largest contribution was from transportation (2.8 kg CO2eq, 36% of total). The second largest was from hospital transfusion processes (1.9 kg CO2eq, 26%), driven mostly by refrigeration. The third largest was donation (1.3 kg CO2eq, 17%) due to the plastic blood packs. Total emissions from RBC transfusion are ~10.3 million kg CO2eq/year. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to estimate GHG emissions attributable to RBC transfusion, quantifying the contributions of each stage of the process. Primary areas for mitigation may include electric vehicles for the blood service fleet, improving the energy efficiency of refrigeration, using renewable sources of electricity, changing the plastic of blood packs, and using methods of disposal other than incineration.

Setting priorities for research in blood donation and transfusion: outcome of the James Lind Alliance priority-setting partnership.

BACKGROUND: How do we decide which topics should be prioritized for research? The need for a robust process for prioritization by key stakeholders, and not just the researchers themselves, was recognized by the James Lind Alliance. A methodology has been established to enable clinicians, patients, and caregivers to identify and prioritize important uncertainties for research in different health areas. This methodology was applied to transfusion medicine to help focus the research agenda in this field. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A steering group was formed in 2015 comprising four donor/patient/caregiver representatives and six clinicians and was supported by an information scientist and James Lind Alliance representatives. The scope of the priority-setting partnership included uncertainties from blood donation through transfusion but excluded laboratory aspects of transfusion and specialist blood products. Three methods were used to identify the top 10 research priorities: two widely disseminated online surveys, a search of existing literature, and a final prioritization workshop. RESULTS: There were 408 respondents to the first survey contributing 817 questions, which were refined into 54 indicative questions that had not already been answered by previous research. Respondents to a second survey were asked to select the three questions they believed to be the most important. The 30 most popular research questions were then brought to a workshop of donors, patients, and caregivers to produce the "top 10." CONCLUSION: This prioritized list should be of considerable value to both researchers and funding bodies when considering what research should be conducted in transfusion medicine.

Post-partum haemorrhage and tranexamic acid: a global issue.

Post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) remains the major cause of maternal death worldwide, with the overwhelming majority of bleeding deaths occurring in low income countries. These bleeding deaths occur due to a complex network of biological and socioeconomic factors, including changes to haemostasis and fibrinolysis during pregnancy. Tranexamic acid (TxA) has been shown to reduce death in bleeding trauma patients safely and is effective in reducing bleeding in surgical patients, however its role in PPH has been less well established. We discuss the impact of the recently published World Maternal Antifibrinolytic (WOMAN) trial, which demonstrated a significant reduction in bleeding deaths (Risk ratio 0·81) in women with PPH who received intravenous TxA compared to those receiving placebo. There were no increases in post-partum thrombotic rates in mothers or breast-fed babies. This trial has shown that intravenous TxA can be used safely and effectively to treat PPH, and should be implemented widely to reduce death due to PPH. However, for the full benefit of TxA to be fully realised in resource-constrained settings, the effectiveness of oral or topical administration and/or pre-emptive dosing need to be investigated.

Computerised decision support systems to promote appropriate use of blood products.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effect of computerised decision support systems (DSSs) on transfusion practice.

Implementation of a clinical decision support system improves compliance with restrictive transfusion policies in hematology patients.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence for restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion but compliance with recommended transfusion triggers is variable. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) has been found to reduce unnecessary transfusion in some clinical settings when physicians are advised they are noncompliant with the current guidelines. The objective was to assess the impact of a CDSS for blood product ordering in patients with hematologic disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All platelet (PLT) and RBC transfusions were identified in hematology patients in three periods: before (baseline), immediately after (CDSS1), and 7 months after implementation of CDSS for blood ordering (CDSS2). Compliance with the recommended transfusion triggers was monitored for all orders made by CDSS or non-CDSS methods during each period. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients with a variety of hematologic diagnoses received 502 RBC and 572 PLT transfusions during the three periods with no significant difference in 1) the mean number of transfusions per patient, 2) the proportion of patients transfused, 3) posttransfusion hemoglobin (Hb), and 4) pre- and posttransfusion PLT count, although mean pretransfusion Hb decreased. The proportion of noncompliant RBC and PLT transfusion requests improved from baseline to CDSS2 (69.0% to 43.4% p ≤ 0.005 for RBCs; and 41.9% to 31.2%, p = 0.16 for PLT) when all orders were compared, although this improvement was not significant at the 5% level for PLTs. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of CDSS for blood product ordering supported by education and physician feedback in the hematology setting had an immediate impact on improving compliance with guidelines for restrictive transfusion practice.

Peri-procedural management of bleeding risks in critical care patients: A local audit and national survey.

Estimation of bleeding risk in critical care patients undergoing interventional radiological procedures is frequently made on the basis of blood tests. If these tests are abnormal, fresh frozen plasma and/or platelet transfusions may be given to reduce the risk of bleeding. We performed an audit and national survey of the use of fresh frozen plasma and platelet transfusions prior to interventional radiological procedures. We identified 68 consecutive chest, abdominal or pelvic drain insertions in 54 critical care patients between 2008 and 2011 at a single intensive care unit. Eight (12.3%) patients were transfused fresh frozen plasma prior to drain insertion despite having a prothrombin time below 22 s. One patient with a prothrombin time above this threshold received fresh frozen plasma. One patient received a platelet transfusion, at double dose, despite a platelet count above 50 × 109/l. A national survey of interventional radiologists demonstrated extensive variability in safe thresholds for invasive procedures and usage of fresh frozen plasma. There is a need for further clarification around coagulopathy and interventional radiology in the critical care setting.

The impact of electronic decision support on transfusion practice: a systematic review.

Decision support systems (DSSs) provide clinicians with tailored treatment recommendations by combining individual patient information and local guidelines. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of electronic DSS on blood product ordering practices. Eligible studies were identified from searches of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and the Transfusion Evidence Library from January 2000 to April 2014. Of these, 23 articles were eligible, resulting in the inclusion of 20 independent studies in this systematic review. There was a significant variation in study population, the type of DSS used, and outcome reporting. All but one study used a before-after design without any element of randomization. Overall, there is good evidence that implementation of a DSS improves red blood cell usage. The effect of a DSS on plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate usage is less clear probably because fewer studies have been conducted focusing on these products. In addition, the introduction of a DSS resulted in cost savings in the 7 studies that reported financial outcomes. Patient outcomes were generally not studied in detail, and there were few data on the sustainability of the effect of DSS. Further data are needed to assess the effect of a DSS on blood products other than red blood cell, and future studies should standardize reporting of outcomes.