Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Toxicol Sci ; 58(2): 399-415, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11099651

ABSTRACT

The rapid discovery of sequence information from the Human Genome Project has exponentially increased the amount of data that can be retrieved from biomedical experiments. Gene expression profiling, through the use of microarray technology, is rapidly contributing to an improved understanding of global, coordinated cellular events in a variety of paradigms. In the field of toxicology, the potential application of toxicogenomics to indicate the toxicity of unknown compounds has been suggested but remains largely unsubstantiated to date. A major supposition of toxicogenomics is that global changes in the expression of individual mRNAs (i.e., the transcriptional responses of cells to toxicants) will be sufficiently distinct, robust, and reproducible to allow discrimination of toxicants from different classes. Definitive demonstration is still lacking for such specific "genetic fingerprints," as opposed to nonspecific general stress responses that may be indistinguishable between compounds and therefore not suitable as probes of toxic mechanisms. The present studies demonstrate a general application of toxicogenomics that distinguishes two mechanistically unrelated classes of toxicants (cytotoxic anti-inflammatory drugs and DNA-damaging agents) based solely upon a cluster-type analysis of genes differentially induced or repressed in cultured cells during exposure to these compounds. Initial comparisons of the expression patterns for 100 toxic compounds, using all approximately 250 genes on a DNA microarray ( approximately 2.5 million data points), failed to discriminate between toxicant classes. A major obstacle encountered in these studies was the lack of reproducible gene responses, presumably due to biological variability and technological limitations. Thus multiple replicate observations for the prototypical DNA damaging agent, cisplatin, and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) diflunisal and flufenamic acid were made, and a subset of genes yielding reproducible inductions/repressions was selected for comparison. Many of the "fingerprint genes" identified in these studies were consistent with previous observations reported in the literature (e. g., the well-characterized induction by cisplatin of p53-regulated transcripts such as p21(waf1/cip1) and PCNA [proliferating cell nuclear antigen]). These gene subsets not only discriminated among the three compounds in the learning set but also showed predictive value for the rest of the database ( approximately 100 compounds of various toxic mechanisms). Further refinement of the clustering strategy, using a computer-based optimization algorithm, yielded even better results and demonstrated that genes that ultimately best discriminated between DNA damage and NSAIDs were involved in such diverse processes as DNA repair, xenobiotic metabolism, transcriptional activation, structural maintenance, cell cycle control, signal transduction, and apoptosis. The determination of genes whose responses appropriately group and dissociate anti-inflammatory versus DNA-damaging agents provides an initial paradigm upon which to build for future, higher throughput-based identification of toxic compounds using gene expression patterns alone.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/genetics , DNA Damage , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Algorithms , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Cisplatin/pharmacology , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Tumor Cells, Cultured
2.
Angle Orthod ; 69(6): 539-42, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10593445

ABSTRACT

Based on M-point, defined as the center of the largest circle that is tangent to the superior, anterior, and palatal outlines of the maxilla in the sagittal view, a growth axis and its direction are described for each gender from age 7.4 to 18.75 years. Growth increments along the C-axis, defined by sella-M-point, are described by regression formulas with correlation coefficients of 0.618 for females and 0.669 for males. The vector (direction) of the growth axis, defined by the angle S-M-C-axis, increases in females from 42.21 degrees at 7.4 years to 44.47 degrees at 18.75 years, with a standard deviation of 3.55 degrees. In males, it increases from a mean of 41.69 degrees at 7.6 years to 45.55 degrees at 18.6 years, with a standard deviation of 2.74 degrees. This is based on 172 serial lateral cephalograms of 20 females and 174 serial lateral cephalograms of 19 males. The C-axis incremental growth change and its vector offer a means of quantifying complex maxillary growth in the sagittal plane via cephalometric measurements relative to and coordinated with other craniofacial structures.


Subject(s)
Maxilla/growth & development , Adolescent , Aging , Cephalometry/statistics & numerical data , Child , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Observer Variation , Radiography , Random Allocation
3.
J Prosthet Dent ; 60(2): 219-21, 1988 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3172006

ABSTRACT

The coloring technique may be used for facial prosthetic materials that can be processed in gypsum molds. With different surface textures and varying thicknesses built into the technique, it is a reliable method for color verification of facial prosthesis before final processing.


Subject(s)
Color , Dimethylpolysiloxanes , Maxillofacial Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Humans , Silicone Elastomers , Waxes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...