Buprenorphine Facilitates Rapid Weaning From Very-High-Dose Intrathecal Hydromorphone.

Pain management in patients on chronic opioid therapy is a common clinical challenge. The phenomena of opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance are important contributors to that challenge. There are multiple strategies described to wean opioid doses and/or transition patients off opioids altogether. However, there is very little data to guide transitions off chronic intrathecal opioids. Here, we report on two patients with intractable post-laminectomy pain syndrome, resulting in severe functional limitation in the setting of opioid escalation culminating in the intrathecal delivery of hydromorphone to daily doses as high as 20 mg/day. We describe their rapid successful weaning off opioids using low-dose buprenorphine, which resulted in a dramatic improvement in pain and function.

Perioperative Management of Extended-Release Buprenorphine: A Narrative Review and Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative management of formulations of buprenorphine used for the treatment of opioid use disorder and/or pain are common clinical challenges. Care strategies are increasingly recommending continuation of buprenorphine while administering multimodal analgesia including full agonist opioids. While this "simultaneous strategy" is relatively simple for the shorter-acting sublingual buprenorphine formulation, best practices are needed for the increasingly prescribed extended-release buprenorphine (ER-buprenorphine). To our knowledge there are no prospective data to guide perioperative management of patients on ER-buprenorphine. Herein we provide a narrative review, report on the perioperative experiences of a series of patients maintained on ER-buprenorphine, and propose recommendations for perioperative ER-buprenorphine management based on best evidence, clinical experience, and our judgments. CASES: Here we present clinical data describing the perioperative experiences of patients maintained on extended-release buprenorphine who recently underwent a variety of surgeries ranging from outpatient inguinal hernia repair to multiple inpatient surgeries for source control in sepsis, at different medical centers throughout the United States. These patients were identified via an email solicitation to substance use disorder treatment providers throughout a nationwide healthcare system, requesting cases of patients maintained on extended-release buprenorphine who had recently undergone surgery. We report here on all of the cases received. DISCUSSION: Extrapolating from these and recently published case reports, we describe an approach to perioperative management of extended-release buprenorphine.

Perioperative Management of Extended-release Buprenorphine.

Perioperative management of buprenorphine is increasingly characterized by continuation of buprenorphine throughout the perioperative period while coadministering full agonist opioids for analgesia. Although this "simultaneous strategy" is commonly used for the shorter-acting sublingual buprenorphine formulations, there is little to guide management of the extended-release formulations of buprenorphine. Here we report the perioperative experience of an individual maintained on extended-release buprenorphine who successfully underwent major surgeries utilizing a strategy of performing the surgeries at the time of the next scheduled dose.

Patient-Centered Perioperative Care for a Victim of Military Sexual Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: The patient population seen in our nation's Veterans Affairs Healthcare system is increasingly female and an alarming percentage of our veterans, male and female alike, report a history of military sexual trauma (MST), which is associated with an increased burden of morbidities including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance abuse. The experience of surgery can produce symptoms of PTSD in a clinically significant percentage of patients. This article describes the challenges of achieving a patient-centered perioperative care plan in the case of a female veteran who suffers from PTSD as a result of MST. METHODS: We provide a brief background on the changing demographics of our nation's veterans, a review of MST and patient-centered care, and a description of the interdisciplinary care plan created and implemented for our patient. We note how this care model employs key elements of the Perioperative Surgical Home Model as developed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Finally, we propose an agenda for improving perioperative care for this group of veterans. No institutional review board was required for this case report-based discussion. RESULTS: The patient-centered care plan developed and implemented by an interdisciplinary team was well received by the patient and enabled her to comply with her postsurgical physical therapy. This recent interdisciplinary experience was in stark contrast to her experience of former surgical procedures, and produced much higher patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Improvements are needed in patient-centered perioperative care for victims of MST, both within the Veterans Affairs system and in the larger health care system. We suggest an agenda to improve care for these patients including: (1) increasing provider awareness and education about MST and about the potential psychological trauma of surgery per se, (2) employing elements of the Perioperative Surgical Home to encourage patient-centered care involving collaboration within an interdisciplinary team, (3) and measurement of patient centered outcomes. Perioperative care for the victim of MST is heretofore not addressed in the literature. We hope this case report and review will stimulate further research into optimizing care for these vulnerable patients.

An Agenda for Improving Perioperative Code Status Discussion.

Code status discussions (CSDs) clarify patient preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. CSDs are a key component of perioperative care, particularly at the end of life, and must be both patient-centered and shared. Physicians at all levels of training are insufficiently trained in and inappropriately perform CSD; this may be particularly true of perioperative physicians. In this article, we describe the difficulty of achieving a patient-centered, shared perioperative CSD in the case of a medical professional with a do-not-resuscitate order. We provide a brief background in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, do-not-resuscitate, and CSD before proposing an agenda for improving perioperative CSD.