Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 21(2): 217-23, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16491006

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rapid detection of aneuploidies by quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) allows reliable prenatal diagnosis of trisomies 21, 18, and 13. Discussion has been raised as to whether single QF-PCR could be an alternative to traditional cytogenetic karyotyping for certain referral categories. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an indication-based classification of cases at risk of missing clinically relevant chromosomal disorders by QF-PCR. METHODS: From October 1999 to November 2003, 4,682 of 14,123 patients referred for amniocentesis decided to have QF-PCR as a rapid adjunct to conventional cytogenetic evaluation. Patients were classified according to the risk of missing chromosomal abnormalities by QF-PCR based on anamnestic risk and ultrasound prior to amniocentesis. The results in these two defined categories were compared in relation to the clinical significance of cytogenetic results. RESULTS: QF-PCR and conventional cytogenetic analysis had concordant results in 4,617 of 4,682 (98.6%) cases. Thirty-six of 110 (32.2%) clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities were missed by QF-PCR. Patients classified not to be at risk of missing chromosomal abnormalities using QF-PCR had a residual risk of 1/166 (0.6%) for chromosomal distortions of clinical significance. CONCLUSION: Classification by anamnestic and sonographic data does not specifically identify patients at risk of structural abnormalities. Clinical relevance of the nondetected anomalies essentially justifies traditional karyotyping regardless of risk classification.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Amniocentesis , Chromosome Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Risk
2.
Chromosome Res ; 12(3): 239-44, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15125637

ABSTRACT

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) in human can be defined as additional centric chromosome fragments smaller than chromosome 20. For most small or minute SMCs a correlation with clinical symptoms is lacking, mostly due to problems in visualizing their euchromatic content. Recently we described two new molecular cytogenetic approaches for the comprehensive characterization of small SMCs, excluding those few cases with neo-centromeres. Minute SMCs, consisting preferentially of alpha-satellite DNA, are characterizable in one step by the centromere-specific multicolor FISH (cenM-FISH) approach. For further characterization of minute SMCs and eventually present euchromatic content, the recently developed centromere-near-specific multicolor FISH (subcenM-FISH) technique can be applied. These two approaches are highly informative and easy to perform, as demonstrated in the present report on the example of a prenatal case with a minute SMC derived from chromosome 3 cytogenetically described as min(3)(:p12.1 --> q11.2:).


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/methods , Euchromatin/genetics , Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Trisomy/diagnosis , Centromere/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 3/ultrastructure , Female , Genetic Markers , Humans , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis , Trisomy/genetics
3.
Cytogenet Genome Res ; 104(1-4): 390-3, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15162070

ABSTRACT

Precise breakpoint definition of chromosomal rearrangements using conventional banding techniques often fails, especially when more than two breakpoints are involved. The classic banding procedure results in a pattern of alternating light and dark bands. Hence, in banded chromosomes a specific chromosomal band is rather identified by the surrounding banding pattern than by its own specific morphology. In chromosomal rearrangements the original pattern is altered and therefore the unequivocal determination of breakpoints is not obvious. The multicolor banding technique (mBAND, see Chudoba et al., 1999) is able to identify breakpoints unambiguously, even in highly complex chromosomal aberrations. The mBAND technique is presented and illustrated in a case of intrachromosomal rearrangement with seven breakpoints all having occurred on one chromosome 16, emphasizing the unique analyzing power of mBAND as compared to conventional banding techniques.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosome Banding/methods , Chromosome Painting/methods , Chromosomes, Human/ultrastructure , Chromosome Breakage , Chromosomes, Human/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16/ultrastructure , Humans , Karyotyping/methods , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...