ABSTRACT
AIMS: The pressure responses of four genotypes of F-specific RNA bacteriophages, f2, GA, Qbeta and SP, were evaluated with respect to pressure magnitude, treatment temperature and suspending medium. METHOD AND RESULTS: The pressure responses were studied with respect to pressure magnitude (350 to 600 MPa), treatment temperature (-10 to 50 degrees C) and suspending media. Phages f2 and GA had much higher pressure resistances than Qbeta and SP. Pressure resistances of Qbeta and SP were enhanced with increase in salt concentrations in the range of 350 to 600 MPa from -10 to 50 degrees C in PBS. Qbeta and SP had greater pressure resistances when suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with added glucose (5%, w/w), UHT whole milk and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium plus 10% fetal bovine sera than they did in PBS. Two surfactants, sucrose laurate and monolaurin, and one chelating agent, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), increased the pressure resistance of Qbeta and SP, but had modest effect on either f2 or GA. CONCLUSIONS: Four representative F-specific RNA bacteriophages, f2 (serotype I), GA (serotype II), Qbeta (serotype III) and SP (serotype IV) showed different resistances to hydrostatic pressure in the range of 350-600 MPa. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study screened for practical surrogates of HAV for validation of commercial high hydrostatic pressure processing.
Subject(s)
Hydrostatic Pressure , RNA Phages/physiology , Chelating Agents/pharmacology , Culture Media , Edetic Acid/pharmacology , Genotype , Glucose/metabolism , Laurates/pharmacology , Monoglycerides/pharmacology , RNA Phages/drug effects , RNA Phages/metabolism , Sodium Chloride/metabolism , Sucrose/analogs & derivatives , Sucrose/pharmacology , Surface-Active Agents/pharmacology , Temperature , Virus Inactivation/drug effectsABSTRACT
Pressure inactivation of four types of coliphages, varphiX 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus), lambda imm434 (dsDNA virus) and T4 (dsDNA virus), was studied to evaluate their potential as human enteric viral surrogates for use in validation of commercial pressure processing treatments. Phage varphiX 174 demonstrated an unexpected high resistance to pressure with no more than 1-log(10) reduction observed following exposures to 350-600 MPa. There was no greater than 1-log(10) reduction below 500 MPa for MS2 in modified phosphate-buffered saline, but a 3.3-log(10) reduction was observed for MS2 pressurized at 600 MPa. Coliphages lambda imm434 and T4 were relatively sensitive to pressure in demonstrating inactivation at 350 MPa. At 21 degrees C, lambda imm434 was inactivated in modified phosphate-buffered saline or Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium plus 5% fetal bovine sera by at least 7.5-log(10) when exposed to 400 MPa for 5 min. Treatment at 450 MPa for 5 min was necessary to obtain a log(10) reduction of 6-7 for T4.
Subject(s)
Coliphages/growth & development , Food Microbiology , Hydrostatic Pressure , Virus Inactivation , Analysis of Variance , Hepatitis A virus/growth & development , Temperature , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Vibrio parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802, Vibrio vulnificus ATCC 27562, Vibrio cholerae O:1 ATCC 14035, Vibrio cholerae non-O:1 ATCC 14547, Vibrio hollisae ATCC 33564, and Vibrio mimicus ATCC 33653 were treated with 200 to 300 MPa for 5 to 15 min at 25 degrees C. High hydrostatic pressure inactivated all strains of pathogenic Vibrio without triggering a viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state; however, cells already existing in a VBNC state appeared to possess greater pressure resistance.
