Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Robotic Staging for Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to estimate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after robotic staging for endometrial cancer and to compare the incidence of VTE in patients who received a single dose of preoperative prophylaxis of enoxaparin with those who received extended postoperative prophylaxis. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent robot-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Patients were categorized into two groups: preoperative prophylaxis (PP), patients who received a single dose of enoxaparin preoperatively, and extended prophylaxis (EP), patients who received 28 days of enoxaparin postoperatively. RESULTS: In total, 148 patients were included, with 117 patients in the PP group and 31 patients in the EP group. The overall incidence of VTE within 30 days postoperatively was 0.67%. No significant difference was found between the PP and the EP groups (0.9% and 0%, respectively; P = 1.00). Most patients in the cohort had endometrioid adenocarcinoma (78%) with low-grade disease (70%), although there were a greater number of patients in the PP group with uterine serous carcinoma compared with the EP group (17% vs 10%; P = 0.034). The PP group had higher estimated blood loss (106 vs 81 mL; P = 0.009) and longer operative times (178 vs 151 min; P = 0.028) compared with the EP group. Significantly more patients in the PP group underwent lymph node dissection compared with the EP group (32% vs 7%; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VTE following robot-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer in this study was 0.67%. No significant difference was found in VTE incidence between the PP group compared with the EP group. Mechanical prophylaxis plus a single dose of preoperative pharmacologic prophylaxis may suffice for low-risk patients following robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.

Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling in Robot-Assisted Staging of Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) sampling in endometrial cancer staging has become an acceptable standard. Indocyanine green dye injected into the cervix and detected by near-infrared light is technically simple and sensitive. We aimed to evaluate SLN sampling in robot-assisted surgical staging of endometrial cancer at a university-affiliated teaching hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review, from January 2016 to December 2017, of patients who underwent robot-assisted surgical staging with cervical injection of indocyanine green dye detected by near-infrared light. The map rate, sensitivity, false negatives, and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 105 charts were reviewed; 79 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 65 (range 38-93) and the mean body mass index was 33.3 (range 16-49). Most patients (72.2%) had stage I disease and grade 1 or 2 histology (77.1%). Eight (10.1%) patients had lymph node metastasis. Seventy-two (91.1%) patients had positive mapping to at least 1 SLN. Sixty-two (78.5%) patients had bilateral mapping. Forty-four patients had concurrent pelvic ± para-aortic lymph node dissection and were included in the sensitivity analysis. Five of 44 cases had LN metastasis. The sensitivity was 80%, and the negative predictive value of SLN sampling was 97.5%. CONCLUSIONS: SLN mapping and sampling at a university-affiliated teaching hospital have comparable map rate, sensitivity, and negative predictive value as demonstrated in multiple trials. The technique has the potential to standardize endometrial cancer staging across different practice settings.

Meigs syndrome presenting with severely elevated CA-125 level.

A 64-year-old woman referred to Gynaecological Oncology secondary to the finding of pelvic mass and ascites. Imaging showed multiple pelvic masses, with the largest mass measuring 20 cm in diameter, as well as bilateral pleural effusions and abdominal ascites, suspicious for ovarian carcinoma. Laboratory findings included elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) of 2124 units/mL. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for pathological evaluation. Postoperatively, the patient had resolution of ascites and pleural effusion. Surgical pathology revealed a 26 cm right ovarian fibroma, confirming the diagnosis of Meigs syndrome. Despite the high suspicion for ovarian carcinoma in patients presenting with elevated CA-125 level, pelvic mass, ascites and pleural effusion, the diagnosis of Meigs syndrome cannot be excluded without pathological evaluation of mass.

Challenges to Intraoperative Evaluation of Endometrial Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intraoperative evaluation of the uterus has been reported to predict risk of lymph node spread in endometrial cancer. Four criteria have been prospectively validated by the Mayo Clinic; histopathology, grade, tumor size, and depth of myometrial invasion. The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of intraoperative evaluation in a university-affiliated teaching setting. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of 105 cases of endometrial cancer who underwent robotic-assisted staging from January 2016 through December 2017. RESULTS: Seventy-five cases were included. The mean age was 65 y and mean body mass index was 33 kg/m2. Fifty-eight patients (80.6%) had no change between intraoperative and postoperative grade. This yielded a 19.4% discordance rate with a significant disagreement (P = .003, Cohen's κ = 0.705). Fifty-eight patients (82.9%) had no change in depth of invasion. This yielded a 17.1% discordance rate with a significant disagreement (P = .0498, Cohen's kappa of 0.69 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.85]). Average tumor diameter was 3.4 cm. Seven patients (11.7%) were upsized from the low-risk (≤2 cm) to the high-risk category (>2 cm). This led to an 11.7% discordance rate, with a significant disagreement (P = .008, Cohen's kappa of 0.69 [95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.89]). In 15 of 75 cases (20%), intraoperative evaluation of the size of the tumor was not possible and deferred to the final pathology report. CONCLUSION: We conclude the Mayo Clinic Criteria cannot be universally adopted until all four criteria can be validated through a prospective study that includes institutions that have variable resources.