Metabolic Syndrome and Cognitive Function in Midlife.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors associated with cognitive decline. We investigated the relationship between MetS and cognition in middle-aged adults. We hypothesized that higher numbers of MetS components will relate to poorer performance on executive function (EF) tasks as frontal lobe regions critical to EF are particularly vulnerable to cardiovascular disease. METHODS: 197 adults (ages 40-60) participated. MetS was evaluated using established criteria. Composite scores for cognitive domains were computed as follows: Global cognitive function (subtests from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, 2nd Edition), EF (Stroop Color Word, Digit Span Backward, and Trails A and B), and memory (California Verbal Learning Test, 2 Edition). RESULTS: Higher number of MetS components was related to weaker EF-F(4, 191) = 3.94, p = .004, MetS components ß = -.14, p = .044. A similar relationship was detected for tests of memory-F(4, 192) = 7.86, p < .001, MetS components ß = -.15, p = .032. Diagnosis of MetS was not significantly associated with EF domain score (ß = -.05, p = .506) but was significantly associated with memory scores-F(4, 189) = 8.81, p < .001, MetS diagnosis ß = -.19, p = .006. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support prior research linking MetS components at midlife to executive dysfunction and demonstrate that MetS, and its components are also associated with poorer memory function. This suggests that cognitive vulnerability can be detected at midlife. Interventions for MetS at midlife could alter cognitive outcomes.

Upper extremity motor training of a subject with initially motor complete chronic high tetraplegia using constraint-induced biofeedback therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this case study was to determine if a subject with chronic high tetraplegia (C3 AIS A) could learn to use an initially paralyzed upper extremity on the basis of training procedures alone. CASE PRESENTATION: Initially, an AIS examination revealed no purposive movement below the neck other than minimal shoulder movement. Training was carried out weekly over 39 months. Training began based on electromyographic biofeedback; the electrical activity of a muscle (biceps or triceps) was displayed visually on a computer monitor and the subject was encouraged to progressively increase the magnitude of the response in small increments on a trial-by-trial basis (i.e., shaping). When small, overt movements began to appear; these were, in turn, shaped so that their excursion progressively increased. Training then progressed to enable lifting the arm with the aid of the counterweight of a Swedish Help Arm. Mean movement excursions in the best session were: internal rotation 52.5 cm; external rotation 26.9 cm; shoulder extension 22.1 cm; shoulder flexion 15.2 cm; pronation/supination 120°; extension of index finger (D2) 2.5 cm. Movements were initially saltatory, becoming smoother over time. With the Swedish Help Arm, the subject was able to lift her hand an average of 24.3 cm in the best session with 0.7 kg counterweight acting at the wrist (1.9 J of work). DISCUSSION: Results suggest in preliminary fashion the effectiveness of this approach for improving upper extremity function after motor complete high tetraplegia. Thus, future studies are warranted. Possible mechanisms are discussed.