ABSTRACT
Topical antiseptics are widely used for wound treatment, with the goal of disrupting biofilm capacity. We analysed the effectiveness of a variety of antiseptics to inhibit various stages of biofilm formation and to remove biofilms in vitro as well as the agents' cytotoxic effects on fibroblasts. We found that the chlorine-releasing agents exhibited immediate anti-biofilm effects in the short term, with lesser cytotoxicity than agents prepared from more stable compounds, such as biguanide or modified diallyl disulfide-oxide, which, conversely, have better long-term effectiveness. Among the examined organisms, Gram-positive bacteria and Candida albicans were the most sensitive to the antiseptics, whereas Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii were relatively resistant to them. Formulations whose mechanisms of action involve the release of chemically active chlorine were more effective when administered in solution than the gel form, likely because of the stability of the active ingredients during or after preparation of the formula. Interestingly, hypochlorous acid and some superoxidation solutions were effective in preventing biofilm formation within a short time period and showed virtually no toxicity. Our study indicates that most antiseptics remain effective long enough to prevent biofilm formation; thus, even brief application of an antiseptic agent during initial wound treatment can lead to better wound management outcomes.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Candida albicans/drug effects , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Wound Healing/drug effects , Wounds and Injuries/drug therapy , Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effectsABSTRACT
Post-burn hypertrophic scars are characterized by increased collagen synthesis and hyperplasia, and may be associated with erythema, pain, dysesthesia, pruritus, and skin border elevation. Although the etiopathogenesis of hypertrophic scarring remains unclear, proinflammatory and profibrogenic cytokines are known to play an important role in general skin dysfunction. This study assessed mRNA expression, proteins, and type I receptors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 1-beta (IL-1ß) in normal skin, normotrophic and post-burn hypertrophic scars. Skin biopsies were obtained from 10 hypertrophic and 9 normotrophic scars, and 4 normal skin sites. Only post-burn scars covering more than 10% of the body were included. Ex vivo histopathological analysis evaluated scar maturity, in situ hybridization assessed mRNA expression, and cytokine protein and cytokine/cell colocalization were performed using single- and double-label immunohistochemistry, respectively. IL-1ß is overexpressed in hypertrophic scars at the post-transcriptional level, associated primarily with keratinocytes and CD1a(+) cells. Type I receptors for TNF-α are overexpressed in blood vessels of hypertrophic scars. The coordinated overexpression of IL-1ß and TNF-α type I receptor may maintain the fibrogenic phenotypes of hypertrophic scars, even those in "remission".
