Early Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prior to Bypass Surgery Improves Tissue Penetration.

BACKGROUND: We previously identified preparation of the internal mammary artery as a risk factor significantly impairing antibiotic tissue penetration into the presternal subcutaneous tissue. We, therefore, adapted our dosing schema regarding preoperative timing to overcome this risk factor. METHODS: Eight patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with a left internal mammary artery and vein grafts were included in this clinical trial. Cefazolin (4 g) was administered twice (3 hours and 1 hour) prior to skin incision and once during skin closure (2 g). Antibiotic concentrations were measured with subcutaneous microdialysis probes on both sternal sides. Results were directly compared with the previously published patient cohort receiving the standard schema (4 g cefazolin prior to skin incision and 2 g during closure). RESULTS: All patients (7 male, 1 female, 69 ± 7 years, 26.3 ± 3.9 kg/m2) survived the perioperative period. Mean area under the curve on the right and left sternal side was 117.0 ± 92.5 µg/mL and 114.5 ± 83.2 µg/mL, respectively (p = 0.95). This was well above the previously measured mean peak tissue concentrations without early preoperative antibiotic administration on the side of mammary artery harvesting (52.4 ± 48.5 µg/mL vs. 13.1 ± 5.8 µg/mL; p = 0.039). The %fT > minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus during the first 10 hours in presternal tissue was ≥ 70% but did not differ compared with standard schema. CONCLUSIONS: Early, additional preoperative administration of cefazolin was able to significantly increase peak tissue concentrations during surgery compared with the standard protocol. No difference, however, could be achieved in the percentage of time during which the concentration exceeded the MIC.

Cefazolin and linezolid penetration into sternal cancellous bone during coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Deep sternal wound infection is a severe complication after cardiac surgery. Insufficient antibiotic target site concentrations may account for variable success of perioperative prophylaxis. Therefore, we measured perioperative penetration of cefazolin and of linezolid into sternal cancellous bone after sternotomy in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients by in vivo microdialysis. METHODS: Nine patients underwent CABG using a skeletonized left internal mammary artery. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis consisted of 4 g cefazolin prior to skin incision and additional 2 g during skin closure. In addition, 600 mg of linezolid were administered prior to skin incision and after 12 h for study purposes. Two microdialysis probes were inserted into the sternal cancellous bone (left and right side) after sternotomy. RESULTS: First mean peak cefazolin and linezolid plasma concentrations were 273 ± 92 µg/ml and 22.1 ± 8.9 µg/ml, respectively. Mean peak concentrations of antibiotics in sternal cancellous bone on the left and right sternal side were 112 ± 59 µg/ml and 159 ± 118 µg/ml for cefazolin and 10.9 ± 4.0 µg/ml and 12.6 ± 6.1 µg/ml for linezolid, respectively. Cefazolin exceeded the required tissue concentrations for relevant pathogens by far, but linezolid did not gain effective tissue concentrations in all patients for some relevant pathogens. Mammary artery harvesting had no significant effect on antibiotic tissue penetration. CONCLUSIONS: Direct measurement of antibiotic concentration in sternal cancellous bone with in vivo microdialysis is technically demanding but safe and feasible. We could demonstrate sufficient antibiotic coverage with our standard cefazolin-dosing regimen in the sternal cancellous bone during cardiac surgery. Mammary artery harvesting had no clinically relevant effect on tissue penetration. Linezolid concentrations were not sufficient for some relevant pathogens.

The Ross procedure offers excellent survival compared with mechanical aortic valve replacement in a real-world setting.

OBJECTIVES: The ideal prosthesis for young patients requiring aortic valve replacement has not been defined to date. Although the Ross procedure provides excellent survival, its application is still limited. We compared the long-term survival after the Ross procedure with mechanical aortic valve replacement. METHODS: All consecutive Ross procedures and mechanical aortic valve replacements performed between 1991 and 2008 at a single centre were analysed. Only adult patients between 18 and 50 years of age were included in the study. Survival and valve-related complications were evaluated. Furthermore, survival was compared with the age- and sex-matched Austrian population. RESULTS: A total of 159 Ross patients and 173 mechanical valve patients were included. The cumulative survival for the Ross procedure was significantly better, with survival rates of 96, 94 and 93% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively, in comparison to 90, 84 and 75% (P < 0.01) for patients with mechanical valves. A Cox regression analysis including patients' age, gender and valve type revealed age and the type of aortic valve replacement as independent significant factors influencing survival (for age, hazard ratio = 1.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.0-1.1, P = 0.03; and for valve type, hazard ratio = 2.6, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-5.8, P = 0.02). The observed survival was comparable to the expected standard survival for the Ross group but was significantly reduced in the mechanical valve group. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, the Ross procedure is associated with a long-term survival benefit in young adults in comparison to mechanical aortic valve replacement.

Internal mammary artery harvesting influences antibiotic penetration into presternal tissue.

BACKGROUND: Internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) influences tissue perfusion and represents a risk factor for deep sternal wound infection (DSWI). Cephalosporins are routinely administered for prophylaxis during cardiac operations to decrease perioperative wound infections. We hypothesized that mammary artery preparation impairs antibiotic penetration into presternal tissue during CABG. METHODS: Eight patients undergoing skeletonized left mammary artery harvesting for CABG were included. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis was administered: 4 g of cefazolin before skin incision and an additional 2 g during skin closure. Concentrations of cefazolin were measured in subcutaneous tissue on the presternal right and left sides (surgically affected) after sternotomy and additionally in subcutaneous tissue on the thigh (surgically unaffected) by microdialysis over a 10-hour period. RESULTS: Mean peak tissue concentration and the area under the curve (AUC) on the left sternal side were significantly reduced compared with the right side and compared with the thigh (mean peak concentration, 13.1±5.8 versus 24.1±4.7 and 27.8±9.7 µg/mL; p=0.005 and p=0.013; AUC 74.2±31.0 versus 110.4±25.0 and 140.3±46.3 µg×hours per milliliter; p=0.004 and p=0.002). Mean subcutaneous concentrations of cefazolin on the left sternal side exceeded the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC90) of Staphylococcus epidermidis of 4 µg/mL in only 5 of 8 (37.5%) patients after 5 hours. CONCLUSIONS: IMA harvesting significantly impairs local antibiotic penetration during CABG. Common antibiotic dosing schemas should be reevaluated in this cardiac surgical setting.