Early retirement and non-employment after breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether workplace support, sociodemographic factors and co-morbidity are associated with early retirement or non-employment due to other reasons among breast cancer survivors. We also compared quality of life and chronic symptoms (pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression) among employed, retired and other non-employed breast cancer survivors. METHODS: We identified breast cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997 and 2002 from either a hospital or a cancer registry in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway (NOCWO study). All patients had been treated with curative intent. Information on employment, co-morbidity and support was collected via a questionnaire. The sample included 1111 working-aged cancer-free survivors who had been employed at the time of diagnosis. We used multinomial logistic regression models to analyse the association of various determinants with early retirement and other non-employment (due to unemployment, subsidized employment or being a homemaker). RESULTS: Low education, low physical quality of life, co-morbidity and pain were associated with both early retirement and other non-employment after cancer. Other non-employed survivors also rated their mental quality of life as lower and experienced anxiety and fatigue more often than all the other survivors. Moreover, they reported a lower level of supervisor support after their diagnosis than the employed survivors. Retired survivors more often reported weak support from colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in ill health and functional status between various groups of non-employed cancer survivors need to be considered when planning policy measures for improving the labour market participation of this population and preventing their early withdrawal from working life.

Predictors of distress in cancer patients and their partners: the role of optimism in the sense of coherence construct.

AIM: The aim of this study was to clarify the associations between sense of coherence (SOC), dispositional optimism and distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) in cancer patients and their partners. METHODS: The associations between SOC, dispositional optimism (Life Orientation Test-Revised, LOT-R), depression (Beck Depression Inventory-14, BDI-14) and anxiety (Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales, EMAS-State) were studied in 147 cancer couples. The data were collected with self-report questionnaires at the time of diagnosis (2 months) and after 6 months. Path analysis was used to analyse the predictors of follow-up distress and crossover effects in the longitudinal data. RESULTS: Optimistic patients and patients with strong SOC as well as their partners reported fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety than less optimistic subjects and subjects with weaker SOC. Optimism partially explained the effect of SOC on distress and SOC seemed to be an independent factor in predicting distress. Patient and partner distress at baseline and at 8-month follow-up correlated positively. In addition, high partner optimism at baseline seemed to predict low patient anxiety at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of SOC seem to include also other elements beyond optimism. In clinical practice, enhancing optimistic expectations of the future and promoting SOC could be expected to reduce distress in cancer patients and their partners.

Work ability of survivors of breast, prostate, and testicular cancer in Nordic countries: a NOCWO study.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer can cause adverse effects on survivors' work ability. We compared the self-assessed work ability of breast, testicular, and prostate cancer survivors to that of people without cancer. We also investigated the association of disease-related and socio-demographic factors and job-related resources (organizational climate, social support, and avoidance behavior) with work ability and looked at whether these associations were different for the survivors and reference subjects. METHODS: Working aged cancer patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2002 were identified from hospital or cancer registries in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, and Norway (Nordic Study on Cancer and Work). A cancer-free reference group was selected from population registries. We collected information on work ability and other factors from 1,490 employed survivors and 2,796 reference subjects via a questionnaire. RESULTS: The adjusted mean value of work ability was slightly lower among the breast and prostate cancer survivors compared to the cancer-free population. Co-morbidity, chemotherapy, low workplace support, and low organizational commitment were associated with reduced work ability. Avoidance behavior from supervisors or colleagues was only related to work ability among the cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: More attention should be paid to assisting cancer survivors in work life, particularly those who have chronic diseases or have undergone chemotherapy. Although most factors affecting the work ability of the survivors and reference subjects were the same, survivors' work ability seemed to be particularly sensitive to avoidance behavior. The results suggest that there is a need to improve communication at the workplace and develop supportive leadership practices in order to avoid isolating behavior towards cancer survivors.

Cancer as the cause of changes in work situation (a NOCWO study).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of changes in work situation due to cancer and to analyze the association of physically demanding work, social support from supervisors, colleagues or occupational health services, and disease-related factors, with changing employers due to cancer. METHODS: Working-aged patients with breast, testicular or prostate cancer, or lymphoma with a good prognosis between 1997 and 2002 were identified from a hospital or cancer registry in four Nordic countries. The registers provided data on the disease-related factors. Information on changes in work situation, received support, and other work-related factors was collected using a questionnaire (response rate 72%). The frequency of changes in work situation was evaluated among a total of 2030 survivors. Further analyses were carried out among 688 survivors using a multivariable logistic regression model, to investigate factors affecting the risk of changing employers due to cancer. RESULTS: Altogether, 5-10% of cancer survivors had changed employers, occupations or work tasks, 5% had been unemployed, and 9% had retired due to cancer. The physical demands of previous work were the most important reason behind changing employers after cancer. Among women, weak support from supervisors and occupational health personnel increased the risk of changing employers because of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of cancer survivors changed employers, occupations, or work tasks because of cancer. Supervisors' support in the form of lightening physically demanding jobs and taking illness into consideration when planning work tasks, and health-care workers' advice on coping at work may help survivors to maintain their jobs.

A prospective study on women with a history of breast cancer and with or without estrogen replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Because a categorical refusal of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) from postmenopausal patients with a history of breast cancer is not based on any research evidence and may be more harmful than beneficial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of ERT in these women. METHODS: We recruited 131 patients who had been treated for breast cancer for a mean of 4.2 years (range 1 month to 20 years) before. Eighty-eight decided to use ERT, whereas 43 refused or had no need for ERT. At recruitment, the patients were carefully examined for breast and gynaecologic findings. Non-hysterectomized patients wishing to receive ERT (n=54) then started using estradiol as oral tablets (2 mg/day) (n=44) or as transdermal gel (1.5 mg/day) (n=10) in combination with 10-day courses of oral medroxyprogesterone acetate at 4-week intervals, whereas hysterectomized patients (n=34) used only estradiol, orally (2 mg/day) (n=31) or transdermally (1.5 mg/day) (n=3). The patients using ERT were carefully examined 6 and 12 months later, and then annually at a specific outpatient department, and the mean follow-up time is now 2.5 years (range from 1 month to 5.2 years, 216 woman-years). The 43 patients not wishing to receive ERT were followed annually at the oncologic department for a mean of 2.6 years (range from 1 month to 4.7 years), and served as a control group. RESULTS: ERT significantly reduced climacteric symptoms, and the Kupperman score fell by 63%, from 26.9+/-8.6 to 9.9+/-6.7 (mean+/-SD). In non-hysterectomized women, medroxyprogesterone acetate triggered withdrawal bleeding in all except seven women. Seven patients (13%) experienced spotting during ERT. In 27 women, endometrial thickness exceeded 10 mm, and two of the total of 54 patients (3.7%) had simple hyperplasia. This vanished spontaneously in 3-6 months. Ten patients terminated the use of ERT within the first 12 to 39 months due to the lack of severe vasomotor symptoms (n=4) or due to the recurrence of breast cancer or to cancer of the contralateral breast (n=6). Eighty-one of the 88 patients (92%) using ERT showed no evidence of recurrence, whereas five patients (5.7%) had recurrence in 12-36 months and two patients (2.3%) developed a cancer of the contralateral breast in 14-24 months; another one of those wanted to continue with ERT. Thus the combined risk of recurrence or a new cancer of the contralateral breast in ERT users was 7/216 woman-years (3% per year). In the control group, 38 of 43 patients (88.4%) showed no evidence of recurrence or contralateral cancer, whereas four patients had recurrence and one developed a contralateral breast cancer (5/112 woman-years, 4% per year). CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic climacteric patients with a history of breast cancer benefited from ERT without increasing their risk of recurrence, but the short follow-up and the small number of patients limit any definitive recommendations.

Prospective study on gynaecological effects of two antioestrogens tamoxifen and toremifene in postmenopausal women.

To assess and compare the gynaecological consequences of the use of 2 antioestrogens we examined 167 postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during the use of either tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 84) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 83) as an adjuvant treatment of stage II-III breast cancer. Detailed interview concerning menopausal symptoms, pelvic examination including transvaginal sonography (TVS) and collection of endometrial sample were performed at baseline and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment. In a subgroup of 30 women (15 using tamoxifen and 15 toremifene) pulsatility index (PI) in an uterine artery was measured before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment. The mean (+/-SD) follow-up time was 2.3 +/- 0.8 years. 35% of the patients complained of vasomotor symptoms before the start of the trial. This rate increased to 60.0% during the first year of the trial, being similar among patients using tamoxifen (57.1%) and toremifene (62.7%). Vaginal dryness, which was present in 6.0% at baseline, increased during the use of tamoxifen (26.2%) and toremifene (24.1%). Endometrial thickness increased from baseline (3.9 +/- 2.7 mm) to 6.8 +/- 4.2 mm at 6 months (P< 0.001), and no difference emerged between the 2 regimens in this regard. Before the start of the antioestrogen regimen, the endometrium was atrophic in 71 (75.5%) and proliferative in 19 of 94 (20.2%) samples; 4 patients had benign endometrial polyps. During the use of antioestrogen altogether 339 endometrial samples were taken (159 in tamoxifen group, 180 in toremifene group). The endometrium was proliferative more often in the tamoxifen group (47.8%) than in the toremifene group (32.2%) (P< 0.0001). 20 patients had a total of 24 polyps (17 in tamoxifen and 9 in toremifene group, P< 0.05) during the use of antioestrogens. One patient in the toremifene group developed endometrial adenocarcinoma at 12 months, and one patient had breast cancer metastasis on the endometrium. Tamoxifen failed to affect the PI in the uterine artery, but toremifene reduced it by 15.0% (P< 0.05) by 12 months. In conclusion, tamoxifen and toremifene cause similarly vasomotor and vaginal symptoms. Neither regimen led to the development of premalignant endometrial changes. Our data suggest that so close endometrial surveillance as used in our study may not be mandatory during the first 3 years of use of antioestrogen treatment.

Safety and efficacy results of a randomized trial comparing adjuvant toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Finnish Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: In this multicenter trial, toremifene 40 mg/d was compared with tamoxifen 20 mg/d, both given orally for 3 years to postmenopausal, axillary node-positive women after breast surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first 899 patients (toremifene, n = 459; tamoxifen, n = 440) of the total of 1,480 patients accrued to the trial were included in this scheduled safety analysis. The mean follow-up time was 3.4 years. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were well balanced with respect to patient and disease characteristics. The subjective side-effect profile was similar in both treatment groups. Slightly more vascular complications (deep vein thromboses, cerebrovascular events, and pulmonary embolisms) were seen among tamoxifen-treated patients (5.9%) as compared with toremifene-treated patients (3.5%) (P: =.11), whereas bone fractures (P: =.09) and vaginal leukorrhea (P: =.05) were more common in the toremifene group. The number of subsequent second cancers was similar. The breast cancer recurrence rate was 23.1% (n = 106) in the toremifene group and 26.1% (n = 115) in the tamoxifen group (P: =.31). When only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cancer were considered (n = 556), the risk for breast cancer recurrence was nonsignificantly lower among the toremifene-treated women, with a hazards ratio of 0.74 (90% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.04; P: =.14). The mean time to breast cancer recurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The side-effect profile of toremifene resembles that of tamoxifen. The efficacy of toremifene seems to be no less than that of tamoxifen. The trend for fewer breast cancer recurrences in the ER-positive subgroup is encouraging, but a longer follow-up is needed to confirm this.

Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial.

The aim of this study was to determine the communicative needs of the patients in the context of being invited to participate in a clinical trial. A questionnaire was sent to 299 patients with breast cancer randomised in a trial of adjuvant therapy. It was returned by 261 (87%) of them. Ninety-one per cent (231/255) of the patients regarded the information provided as easy or quite easy to understand. However, the method of treatment allocation was unclear to most patients: 51% (128/251) thought that the doctor had chosen the treatment while only 23% (57/251) knew that they had been randomised. Younger and better educated patients had a better understanding. For 55% (125/226) of the patients written information had been helpful in decision making. This correlated highly with the education of the patient. Sixty-eight per cent (174/255) of the patients thought that they had enough time for decision-making. Less educated patients and older patients had needed more time. Eighty-seven per cent (218/251) were happy with their decision to participate. While most patients are satisfied with the information received, there is a poor understanding of how treatment is allocated. Information should be modified for older and less-educated patients. The needs of the patients when offered participation in a clinical trial are clear information, enough time to consider the options and psychological support.

Antiestrogenic tamoxifen and toremifene increase serum leptin levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Because estrogens stimulate the synthesis and release of leptin in the adipocytes, the effect of antiestrogens on the circulating leptin levels were studied. METHODS: Thirty postmenopausal patients with breast cancer were randomized to start either with tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n=15) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n=15), and the patients were examined and serum leptin concentrations measured before the study and at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline leptin concentrations ranged from 4.4 to 60.0 microg/l (15.3+/-13.1 microg/l, mean+/-S.D.), and it correlated positively with the body mass index (BMI) of the subjects (r=0.73, P=0.0001). Taking as a whole the antiestrogen regimen was associated with elevated leptin levels at 6 months (19.5+/-13.8 microg/l, P=0.0001) but no excess increase in leptin levels were seen at 12 months (20.9+/-13.5 microg/l, NS). Subgroup analysis showed no difference between the effects of tamoxifen or toremifene on leptin. BMI increased in 21 women (from 26.2+/-4.3 to 27.3+/-4.8 kg/m2, P=0.0001) at 6 months, but not after that; in nine women BMI did not change. There was no significant correlation between the change in leptin levels and the change in BMI in either group implying that antiestrogens may specifically stimulate leptin production. CONCLUSIONS: Antiestrogens may stimulate the synthesis and release of leptin in the adipocytes. This effect of antiestrogens resembles the effect of estrogen and consequently stimulation of leptin production can be added to the estrogenic effects of antiestrogens.

Antiestrogens reduce plasma levels of endothelin-1 without affecting nitrate levels in breast cancer patients.

Tamoxifen protects against myocardial infarction through mechanisms that are poorly understood. We studied the effects of tamoxifen and another antiestrogen, toremifene, on the production of vasoconstrictive endothelin-1 and of vasodilatory nitric oxide in 44 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. These started treatment, in randomized order, with either tamoxifen (20 mg/day; n = 25) or toremifene (40 mg/day; n = 19). Plasma samples collected before treatment and after 6 and 12 months of both regimens were assayed for endothelin-1 with a specific radioimmunoassay and for nitrite/nitrate with a method based on the Griess reaction. The antiestrogen group as a whole showed a fall in endothelin-1 at 6 months (5.9 +/- 3.3%; p = 0.06) (mean +/- SE) and at 12 months (7.1 +/- 5.5%; p = 0.03). This fall was solely due to toremifene, the use of which was associated with falls in endothelin-1 at 6 months (12.9 +/- 4.7%; p = 0.01) and 12 months (9.2 +/- 6.2%; p = 0.06). The antiestrogen regimen failed to affect plasma nitric oxide significantly but nevertheless the ratio between nitric oxide and endothelin-1 rose by 31.6 +/- 13.3% at 6 months and by 35.6 +/- 15.3% at 12 months in the antiestrogen users, an effect similar in the tamoxifen and toremifene groups. We conclude that antiestrogens may protect against myocardial infarction by preventing the release of endothelin-1 and by shifting the balance between nitric oxide and endothelin-1 to the dominance of the former. Our data predict that toremifene and tamoxifen at the doses studied here will provide similar cardiovascular protection.

Effects of supplemental alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene on colorectal cancer: results from a controlled trial (Finland)

BACKGROUND: Some epidemiological investigations suggest that higher intake or biochemical status of vitamin E and beta-carotene might be associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer. METHODS: We tested the effects of alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene supplementation on the incidence of colorectal cancer in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among 29,133 50-69-year-old male cigarette smokers. Participants were randomly assigned to receive alpha-tocopherol (50 mg), beta-carotene (20 mg), both agents, or a placebo daily for 5-8 years. Incident colorectal cancers (n = 135) were identified through the nationwide cancer registry, and 99% were histologically confirmed. Intervention effects were evaluated using survival analysis and proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Colorectal cancer incidence was somewhat lower in the alpha-tocopherol arm compared to the no alpha-tocopherol arm, but this finding was not statistically significant (relative risk (RR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.09; log-rank test p = 0.15). Beta-carotene had no effect on colorectal cancer incidence (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.75-1.47; log-rank test p = 0.78). There was no interaction between the two substances. CONCLUSION: Our study found no evidence of a beneficial or harmful effect for beta-carotene in colorectal cancer in older male smokers, but does provide suggestive evidence that vitamin E supplementation may have had a modest preventive effect. The latter finding is in accord with previous research linking higher vitamin E status to reduced colorectal cancer risk.

Effects of supplemental alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene on urinary tract cancer: incidence and mortality in a controlled trial (Finland).

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies have suggested a protective effect of vegetables and fruits on urinary tract cancer but the possible protective nutrients are unknown. We studied the effect of alpha-tocopherol (a form of vitamin E) and beta-carotene supplementation on urinary tract cancer in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study. METHODS: A total of 29,133 male smokers aged 50-69 years from southwestern Finland were randomly assigned to receive alpha-tocopherol (50 mg), beta-carotene (20 mg), both agents, or a placebo daily for 5-8 years (median 6.1 years). Incident urothelial cancers (bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis; n = 169) and renal cell cancers (n = 102) were identified through the nationwide cancer registry. The diagnoses were centrally confirmed by review of medical records and pathology specimens. The supplementation effects were estimated using a proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Neither alpha-tocopherol nor beta-carotene affected the incidence of urothelial cancer, relative risk 1.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8-1.5) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.7-1.3), respectively, or the incidence of renal cell cancer, relative risk 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.6) and 0.8 (95% CI 0.6-1.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: Long-term supplementation with alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene has no preventive effect on urinary tract cancers in middle-aged male smokers.

Effects of tamoxifen and toremifene on urinary excretion of pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline and bone density in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Tamoxifen and toremifene are two mostly used antiestrogens in the treatment of breast cancer. To compare their effect on bone in postmenopausal breast cancer patients we measured the urinary output of two bone resorption markers, pyridinoline (Pyr) and deoxypyridinoline (Dpyr) as well as bone density (BMD) in 30 breast cancer patients using either tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 15) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 15) as adjuvant treatment of stage II breast cancer for 1 year. The urinary output of Pyr and Dpyr were assessed before and after 6 and 12 months of the antiestrogen regimen. Lumbar and femoral BMD were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) before and after 12 months of treatment. Both tamoxifen and toremifene were associated with significant decreases in Pyr (mean fall 19.6% and 12.6%, respectively) and Dpyr (mean fall 21.6% and 15.5%, respectively) at 6 months. After 12 months' treatment, Pyr decreased by 30.8% and Dpyr by 21.2% in women using tamoxifen and significantly less in women using toremifene (10.1% and 4.9%, respectively). BMD in the lumbar spine decreased by 1.8% in the toremifene group but increased by 0.4% in the tamoxifen group; in the proximal femur, BMD increased slightly during both tamoxifen and toremifene treatment in all sites measured. Individual changes in Pyr and Dpyr at 6 months showed no significant relation to the change in BMD at 12 months. We conclude that tamoxifen (20 mg/day) and toremifene (40 mg/day) reduce the bone resorption similarly, and this can be detected by falls in urinary output of Pyr and Dpyr at 6 months of treatment.

Prospective randomized trial of interferon alfa-2a plus vinblastine versus vinblastine alone in patients with advanced renal cell cancer.

PURPOSE: The combination of interferon alfa-2a (IFNalpha2a) plus vinblastine (VLB) induces objective tumor responses in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. However, no prospective randomized trial has shown that this treatment prolongs overall survival. We compared overall survival after treatment with IFNalpha2a plus VLB versus VLB alone in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 160 patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell cancer to receive either VLB alone or IFNalpha2a plus VLB for 12 months or until progression of disease. In both groups, VLB was administered intravenously at 0.1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, and in the combination group IFNalpha2a was administered subcutaneously at 3 million units three times a week for 1 week, and 18 million units three times a week thereafter for the second and subsequent weeks. For patients unable totolerate IFNalpha2a at 18 million units per injection, the dose was reduced to 9 million units. RESULTS: Median survival was 67.6 weeks for the 79 patients receiving IFNalpha2a plus VLB and 37.8 weeks for the 81 patients treated with VLB (P =.0049). Overall response rates were 16. 5% for patients treated with IFNalpha2a plus VLB and 2.5% for patients treated with VLB alone (P =.0025). Treatment with the combination was associated with constitutional symptoms and abnormalities in laboratory parameters, but no toxic deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: The combination of IFNalpha2a plus VLB is superior to VLB alone in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This is the first study to demonstrate that survival can be prolonged by using IFNalpha2a for these patients.

Intensified adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil therapy: a dose-finding study for ambulatory patients with breast cancer.

Escalating doses of cyclophosphamide were given every 3 weeks as adjuvant treatment for women operated for breast cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide that can be given with constant doses of methotrexate (40 mg/m2) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2; CMF) as an outpatient treatment without the routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (G-CSF). The dose of cyclophosphamide was increased by 250 mg/m2 starting from the dose of 1,000 mg/m2. Mesna was given to prevent cystitis. The criteria for dose-limiting toxicity were grade IV granulocytopenia lasting for longer than 48 h, granulocytopenic infection or other grade IV toxicities. G-CSF and ofloxacin were used if grade IV granulocytopenia continued for longer than 48 h or if granulocytopenic infection occurred. At the dose level of 1,500 mg/m2 (500 mg/m2/week) 22 (92%) of the 24 patients had grade IV granulocytopenia during the 6 CMF cycles given, but only 3 (13%) had granulocytopenic fever. G-CSF was used in 28% of the cycles at this dose level. Other toxicities included complete alopecia (79%), nausea and vomiting. Sixteen (80%) of the premenopausal women became postmenopausal. At the dose level of 1,750 mg/m2 all 3 patients treated had to be hospitalized after the first cycle due to neutropenic infection (n = 2) or intractable vomiting even though prophylactic G-CSF was used. We conclude that intravenous CMF with a cyclophosphamide dose of 1,500 mg/m2 given at 3-week intervals with the selective use of prophylactic G-CSF is feasible as adjuvant treatment for patients with breast cancer.

Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: We report results of a randomized prospective study that compared single agents of low toxicity given both as the first-line and second-line chemotherapy with combination chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer with distant metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in the single-agent arm (n = 153) received weekly epirubicin (E) 20 mg/m2 until progression or until the cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2, followed by mitomycin (M) 8 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, and those in the combination chemotherapy arm (n = 150) were first given cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, E 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 three times per week (CEF) followed by M 8 mg/m2 plus vinblastine (V) 6 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Exclusion criteria included age greater than 70 years, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status greater than 2, prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and presence of liver metastases in patients younger than 50. RESULTS: An objective response (complete [CR] or partial [PR]) was obtained in 55%, 48%, 16%, and 7% of patients treated with CEF, E, M, and MV, respectively. A response to CEF tended to last longer than a response to E (median, 12 v 10.5 months; P = .07). Treatment-related toxicity was less in the single-agent arm and quality-of-life (QOL) analysis favored the single-agent arm. No significant difference in time to progression or survival was found between the two arms. Similarly, no difference in survival was found when the patients who received both the planned first-and second-line treatments were compared or when survival was calculated from the beginning of the second-line therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with single-agent E followed by single-agent M had similar survival, but less treatment-related toxicity and better QOL as compared with those treated with CEF followed by MV.

Comparison of effects of tamoxifen and toremifene on bone biochemistry and bone mineral density in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Antiestrogens are used in the treatment, and sometimes even in the prophylaxis, of breast cancer. Tamoxifen is the most commonly used antiestrogen, but toremifene is gaining in popularity. We compared here the effects of tamoxifen and toremifene on bone metabolism and density in 30 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer, who were randomized to receive tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 16) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 14) for 1 yr. Biochemical markers of bone resorption [urinary hydroxyproline, serum cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen, urinary cross-linked aminoterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx)] and bone formation [serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and aminoterminal and carboxyterminal propeptide of type I procollagen] were assessed before treatment and at 6 and 12 months of the antiestrogen regimen. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and proximal femur (neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle) was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry before treatment and at 12 months of treatment. Urinary NTx decreased after 6 months' use of tamoxifen (mean fall: 33%) and of toremifene (mean fall: 16%). Use of tamoxifen was associated with a significant decrease in osteocalcin (mean fall: 25%) and aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (mean fall: 22%), whereas toremifene failed to influence these markers. Tamoxifen increased BMD, on average, by 2% in the lumbar spine, 1% in the femoral neck, and 5% in Ward's triangle. Toremifene failed to increase BMD at any site measured, and in contrast, a slight trend toward a fall (-0.3 to -0.9%) in BMD was seen in patients treated with toremifene. Falls in urinary NTx, from baseline to 6 months, correlated significantly with changes in the lumbar spine BMD (r = -0.57, P = 0.0002) in the whole patient series. We conclude that tamoxifen (20 mg/day) increases BMD in postmenopausal breast cancer patients, whereas toremifene (40 mg/day) merely prevents the increasing age-associated fall in BMD. More prolonged studies on bone metabolism, comparing these two antiestrogens, are needed; but even now, clinicians should be aware of these differences between tamoxifen and toremifene.

Predictive value of c-erbB-2, p53, cathepsin-D and histology of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer.

The value of various prognostic factors in breast cancer patients has been determined in a number of studies. Few reports have been published on the dependence of treatment outcome on histological and immunohistochemical characteristics in the primary tumour in patients with metastatic disease. We studied the incidence and prognostic value of histological and molecular abnormalities in the primary tumour of patients who had developed metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients received a fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen either once a week or once every 4 weeks. Adequate specimens for various analyses were available from 127 patients. Median follow-up time of the patients ranged from 15 to 101 months. In this study, the histological grade of the malignancy best predicted response to chemotherapy (P < 0.0005). Most of the responses were observed in patients with grade 1 tumours; in this group, time to progression was delayed. C-erb B-2 gene amplification and oncoprotein expression had no predictive value. Neither p53 nor cathepsin-D predicted treatment outcome after chemotherapy. None of the factors had an effect on overall survival. Among breast cancer patients who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, response to treatment correlated with histological grade. In patients with histological grade 1 breast cancer, the time to progression was longest. However, overall survival was not affected by histological grade nor the other parameters tested. In addition to histological grade, other prognostic factors that are not included in this study need to be identified to determine which patients with metastatic breast cancer would benefit from cytotoxic treatment.