ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the in vitro antimicrobial effects of carbamide peroxide (CP) and CP-based home bleaching agents against polymicrobial (PM) biofilms. METHODS: Using a high-throughput active attachment model, PM biofilms were cultured on glass coverslips by diluting the stimulated saliva of one healthy adult. All experiments were performed anaerobically in McBain medium, which was refreshed twice daily. After biofilm formation for 24 or 72 hours, the biofilms were treated with 0.5%, 2.5%, 5%, or 10% CP, 20-fold dilutions of HiLite Shade Up (HS) or Opalescence Regular (OR), 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), 0.2% NaF, or deionized water (n = 10 each). Biofilms were dispersed and the number of colony forming units (CFU) was measured on tryptic soy agar blood plates. Coverslips containing 72-hour biofilms treated with 0.5% and 10% CP and deionized water were stained and scanned by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). RESULTS: Treatment of 24- and 72-hour biofilms with HS, OR and CH yielded significantly fewer colonies than treatment with water or 0.2% NaF. No growing colonies were observed after treatment with 10% CP. CLSM showed that the percentage of dead bacteria increased as the concentration of CP increased.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Biofilms/drug effects , Peroxides/pharmacology , Tooth Bleaching Agents/pharmacology , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Bacterial Load/drug effects , Bacteriological Techniques , Carbamide Peroxide , Cariostatic Agents/pharmacology , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Humans , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Confocal , Peroxides/administration & dosage , Saliva/microbiology , Sodium Fluoride/pharmacology , Time Factors , Tooth Bleaching Agents/administration & dosage , Urea/administration & dosage , Urea/pharmacologyABSTRACT
In recent years, it has become well known that the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by blue-light irradiation causes adverse effects of photo-aging, such as age-related macular degeneration of the retina. Thus, orange-tinted glasses are used to protect the retina during dental treatment involving blue-light irradiation (e.g., dental resin restorations or tooth bleaching treatments). However, there are few studies examining the effects of blue-light irradiation on oral tissue. For the first time, we report that blue-light irradiation by quartz tungsten halogen lamp (QTH) or light-emitting diode (LED) decreased cell proliferation activity of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) in a time-dependent manner (<5 min). Additionally, in a morphological study, the cytotoxic effect was observed in the cell organelles, especially the mitochondria. Furthermore, ROS generation induced by the blue-light irradiation was detected in mitochondria of HGFs using fluorimetry. In all analyses, the cytotoxicity was significantly higher after LED irradiation compared with cytotoxicity after QTH irradiation. These results suggest that blue light irradiation, especially by LED light sources used in dental aesthetic treatment, might have adverse effects on human gingival tissue. Hence, this necessitates the development of new dental aesthetic treatment methods and/or techniques to protect HGFs from blue light irradiation during dental therapy.
