Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
MedEdPORTAL ; 19: 11315, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37287958

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Over-the-counter (OTC) products are widely used by families with young children. To educate future pediatricians on OTC product counseling and support the health and safety of children under their care, modern, accessible, and engaging curricula are needed. Methods: We developed an OTC product curriculum consisting of seven videos and one facilitated group discussion using a flipped classroom pedagogy to educate students on counseling parents about OTC product use. Fourth-year medical students pursuing pediatric training from four institutions participated in the curriculum during their end-of-year transition-to-residency course. We measured effectiveness via a pre/post comparison using a student self-assessment with multiple-choice questions. A simulated parent call OSCE provided participants with an opportunity to apply their knowledge and receive directed formative feedback. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: A total of 41 students participated in the curriculum and completed all assessments. The majority (93%) watched all the videos. All participants (100%) agreed the videos were useful. Knowledge improved significantly (pretest mean score = 70%, posttest mean score = 87%, p < .001). No significant differences were found when comparing institution, gender, prior experience, or electives. Discussion: We developed a feasible and effective video-based curriculum to teach OTC product guidance. Given the importance of discussing OTC medications with families and the need for convenient educational tools, this curriculum may have widespread application to medical students during clinical rotations as well as pediatric and family medicine trainees.


Subject(s)
Educational Measurement , Students, Medical , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Curriculum , Students, Medical/psychology
3.
Cureus ; 14(11): e31327, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36514579

ABSTRACT

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) supports exclusive breastfeeding of infants. However, conversations surrounding breastfeeding can be sensitive in nature and cause discomfort for both learners and parents. Additionally, bedside teaching of breastfeeding medicine is a relatively large time commitment which can be difficult for learners rotating through busy delivery centers. These factors along with others have led to known knowledge gaps in medical students, residents, fellows, and even attending knowledge of skill-based breastfeeding competencies supported by the AAP. We aimed to address these gaps by creating a video-based breastfeeding education module working in collaboration with certified lactation consultants at the largest birthing center in Illinois, United States. This technical report describes the utilization of Panopto audio-visual software (Panopto Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States) to successfully create a video-based curriculum for teaching breastfeeding medicine.

4.
Am J Perinatol ; 38(8): 773-778, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31887744

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effect of admission characteristics of uncomplicated moderate to late preterm infants on timing of discharge. One of the first questions that families of infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) ask is, "When is my baby going home?" Moderate to late preterm infants are the largest cohort of NICU patients but little data exist about their length of stay (LOS). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective electronic chart review was completed on 12,498 infants admitted to our NICU between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2015. All inborn infants with a gestational age between 320/7 and 366/7 weeks were studied. RESULTS: A total of 3,240 infants met our inclusion criteria. The mean postmenstrual age at discharge was 363/7 weeks. Infants who were small for gestational age were significantly more likely to have an increased LOS. Infants born between 34 and 366/7 weeks had a significantly increased LOS if they had respiratory distress syndrome. Admission diagnoses of neonatal abstinence syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, hydrops, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, biliary emesis, ABO incompatibly, and a genetic diagnosis all had increased LOS for all late preterm infants. CONCLUSION: For uncomplicated moderate to late preterm infants, clinicians can counsel families that their infants will likely be discharged at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. Small for gestational age infants and those with specific diagnoses may stay longer.


Subject(s)
Gestational Age , Infant, Newborn, Diseases , Infant, Premature , Patient Discharge , Female , Fetal Macrosomia , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature, Diseases , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn , Retrospective Studies
5.
BMC Med Educ ; 20(1): 429, 2020 Nov 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33198733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most frequent indication for antibiotic treatment of children in the United States. Its diagnosis relies on visualization of the tympanic membrane, a clinical skill acquired through a deliberate approach. Instruction in pediatric otoscopy begins in medical school. Medical students receive their primary experience with pediatric otoscopy during the required pediatric clerkship, traditionally relying on an immersion, apprentice-type learning model. A better understanding of their preceptors' clinical and teaching practices could lead to improved skill acquisition. This study investigates how pediatric preceptors (PP) and members of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics (COMSEP) perceive teaching otoscopy. METHODS: A 30-item online survey was administered to a purposeful sample of PP at six institutions in 2017. A comparable 23-item survey was administered to members through the 2018 COMSEP Annual Survey. Only COMSEP members who identified themselves as teaching otoscopy to medical students were asked to complete the otoscopy-related questions on the survey. RESULTS: Survey respondents included 58% of PP (180/310) and 44% (152/348) of COMSEP members. Forty-one percent (62/152) of COMSEP member respondents identified themselves as teaching otoscopy and completed the otoscopy-related questions. The majority agreed that standardized curricula are needed (PP 78%, COMSEP members 97%) and that all graduating medical students should be able to perform pediatric otoscopy (PP 95%, COMSEP members 79%). Most respondents reported usefulness of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) AOM guidelines (PP 95%, COMSEP members 100%). More COMSEP members than PP adhered to the AAP's diagnostic criteria (pediatric preceptors 42%, COMSEP members 93%). The most common barriers to teaching otoscopy were a lack of assistive technology (PP 77%, COMSEP members 56%), presence of cerumen (PP 58%, COMSEP members 60%), time to teach in direct patient care (PP 46%, COMSEP members 48%), and parent anxiety (PP 62%, COMSEP members 54%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified systemic and individual practice patterns and barriers to teaching pediatric otoscopy. These results can inform education leaders in supporting and enabling preceptors in their clinical teaching. This approach can be adapted to ensure graduating medical students obtain intended core clinical skills.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship , Pediatrics , Students, Medical , Child , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Humans , Otoscopy , Teaching , United States
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(8): e2013070, 2020 08 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32804213

ABSTRACT

Importance: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend waiting 3 to 5 days between the introduction of new complementary foods (solid foods introduced to infants <12 months of age), yet with advances in the understanding of infant food diversity, the guidance that pediatric practitioners are providing to parents is unclear. Objective: To characterize pediatric practitioner recommendations regarding complementary food introduction and waiting periods between introducing new foods. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study, a 23-item electronic survey on complementary food introduction among infants was administered to pediatric health care professionals from February 1 to April 30, 2019. Responses were described among the total sample and compared among subgroups. Survey invitations were emailed to 2215 members of the Illinois Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the national American Academy of Pediatrics' Council on Early Childhood. Participants were required to be primary medical practitioners, such as physicians, resident physicians, or nurse practitioners, providing pediatric care to infants 12 months or younger. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measures were recommendations on age of complementary food introduction and waiting periods between the introduction of new foods. Categorical survey items were reported as numbers (percentages) and 95% CIs. Means (SDs) were used to describe continuous survey items. Results: The survey was sent to 2215 practitioners and completed by 604 (response rate, 27.3%). Of these respondents, 41 were excluded because they did not provide care for infants or pediatric patients. The final analyses included responses from 563 surveys. Of these, 454 pediatricians (80.6%), 85 resident physicians (15.1%), and 20 nurse practitioners (3.6%) completed the survey. Only 217 practitioners (38.6%; 95% CI, 34.1%-44.6%) recommended waiting 3 days or longer between food introduction; 259 practitioners (66.3%; 95% CI, 61.4%-70.8%) recommended waiting that amount of time for infants at risk for food allergy development (P = .02). A total of 264 practitioners (46.9%; 95% CI, 42.8%-51.0%) recommended infant cereal as the first food, and 226 practitioners (40.1%; 95% CI, 36.1%-44.2%) did not recommend a specific order. A total of 268 practitioners (47.6%; 95% CI, 43.5%-51.7%) recommended food introduction at 6 months for exclusively breastfed (EBF) infants, and 193 (34.3%; 95% CI, 30.5%-38.3%) recommended food introduction at 6 months for non-EBF infants (P < .001); 179 practitioners (31.8%; 95% CI, 28.1%-35.8%) recommended food introduction at 4 months for EBF infants, and 239 practitioners (42.5%; 95% CI, 38.4%-46.6%) recommended food introduction at 4 months for non-EBF infants (P < .001). A need for additional training on complementary food introduction was reported by 310 practitioners (55.1%; 95% CI, 50.9%-59.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, most pediatric practitioners did not counsel families to wait 3 days or longer between introducing foods unless infants were at risk for food allergy development. The findings suggest that the current recommendation limits infant food diversity and may delay early peanut introduction. Because the approach to food allergy prevention has changed, a reevaluation of published feeding guidelines may be necessary.


Subject(s)
Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena/physiology , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pediatricians/education , Practice Guidelines as Topic
7.
BMC Med Educ ; 19(1): 79, 2019 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30866922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Though pneumatic otoscopy improves accurate diagnosis of ear disease, trainees lack proficiency. We evaluated the effect of three different training techniques on medical students' subsequent reported use of basic and pneumatic otoscopy in patient encounters. METHODS: Pediatric clerkship students participated in an ear exam workshop with randomization to one of three educational interventions: task trainer (Life/form®, Fort Atkinson WI), instructional video, or peer practice. Each student received an insufflator bulb and logbook to record otoscopic exams and completed an 18-item anonymous survey at clerkship conclusion. RESULTS: 115 of 150 students (77%) completed the survey. There was no significant difference in number of basic or pneumatic otoscopic exams performed based on method of training. Most students (68-72%) felt more likely to perform pneumatic otoscopy after training. Though the majority of students performed basic otoscopy on patients when an ear exam was indicated, they used pneumatic otoscopy less than 10% of the time. Students reported significant barriers to otoscopy: time, access to equipment, cerumen impaction, patient hold, and anxiety. Student comments described a culture where insufflation was neither practiced nor valued by supervising physicians. CONCLUSION: Training in pneumatic otoscopy can increase student comfort, but barriers exist to using the skill in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Audiology/education , Diagnostic Techniques, Otological/instrumentation , Ear Diseases/diagnosis , Otoscopy/standards , Students, Medical , Teaching/standards , Adult , Child , Clinical Competence/standards , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Manikins , Otoscopy/methods , Pediatrics/education , Simulation Training
8.
MedEdPORTAL ; 12: 10486, 2016 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30984828

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Good handoffs require teamwork, clear communication, a cognitively safe environment, and a good understanding of the patient's medical needs. Complex tertiary care training institutions require multiple handoffs over a patient's time in the hospital. Medical students need better handoff education. We designed a handoff training exercise using a simulated patient care environment for students to practice and observe multiple handoffs over time. METHODS: An initial large-group didactic session provides direct instruction on handoffs. In small groups, students are subsequently assigned roles as individual physicians in a chain of providers during a simulated patient hospitalization over several days, with an additional student as an observer. Blinded to any prior discussion, student physicians sequentially give and receive handoffs about the patient from a previous physician as their simulated hospital course evolves. The observer shares his or her insights, and a large-group structured debriefing exercise follows. RESULTS: In both 2015 and 2016, we implemented this session with a cohort of 30 fourth-year medical students. Most recently we implemented this with chief residents, and a group of 20 third-year pediatric clerkship students. We reviewed a selection of the discussion guides and found reporters/ observers noted that participants stated the primary problem 95% of the time (19 of 20 handoffs), the patient acuity 90% of the time (18 of 20 handoffs), and a clear contingency plan 85% of the time (17 of 20 handoffs). DISCUSSION: We found students initially to be preoccupied with making correct clinical decisions instead of giving effective handoffs, and consequently we clarified details and adjusted clinical information to be more transparent. Results suggest the session achieves our goals of using a structured handoff method to communicate higher-level information and debrief effectively with peers. We envision this activity to be applicable to teaching handoffs to residents, nurses, and other health care professionals, as well as possibly in diverse clinical environments or in collaboration with outpatient providers.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...