Cognitive aids in the management of clinical emergencies: a systematic review.

Clinical emergencies can be defined as unpredictable events that necessitate immediate intervention. Safety critical industries have acknowledged the difficulties of responding to such crises. Strategies to improve human performance and mitigate its limitations include the provision and use of cognitive aids, a family of tools that includes algorithms, checklists and decision aids. This systematic review evaluates the usefulness of cognitive aids in clinical emergencies. Following a systematic search of the electronic databases, we included 13 randomised controlled trials, reported in 16 publications. Each compared cognitive aids with usual care in the context of an anaesthetic, medical, surgical or trauma emergency involving adults. Most trials used only clinicians in the development and testing of the cognitive aids, and only some trials provided familiarisation with the cognitive aids before they were deployed. The primary outcome was the completeness of care delivered to the patient. Cognitive aids were associated with a reduction in the incidence of missed care steps from 43.3% to 11% (RR (95%CI) 0.29 (0.15-0.16); p < 0.001), and the quality of evidence was rated as moderate. The use of cognitive aids was related to decreases in the incidence of errors, increases in the rate of correctly performed steps and improvement in the clinical teamwork skills scores, non-technical skills scores, subjective conflict resolution scores and the global assessment of team performance. Cognitive aids had an inconsistent influence on the time to first intervention and time to complete care of the patient's condition. It is possible that this was a reflection of how common or rare the crisis in question was as well as the experience and expertise of the clinicians and team. Sufficient thought should be applied to the development of the content and design of cognitive aids, with consideration of the pre-existing guideline ecosystem. Cognitive aids should be tested before their deployment with adequate clinician and team training.

To err is human: use of simulation to enhance training and patient safety in anaesthesia.

Human beings who work in complex, dynamic, and stressful situations make mistakes. This is as true for anaesthetists as for any other health-care professional, but we face unique challenges in the many roles and responsibilities we have in diverse clinical contexts. As a profession, we are well versed in the development and utilization of improvement techniques and technologies that prioritize high-quality, safe care for patients. This article focuses on one particular domain of patient safety in which anaesthetists have been pre-eminent, the use of simulation in training to improve both professional capabilities and patient safety in anaesthetic practice. This review considers the impact of error in health care; the role of anaesthetists in promoting simulation-based education for the development of clinical skills and improved teamwork; and their role in disseminating human factors and quality improvement science to enhance safety in the clinical workplace. Finally, we consider our position at the vanguard of developments in patient safety and how the profession should continue to pursue a leadership role in the application of simulation-based interventions to training and systems design across health care.

Go/no-go decision in anaesthesia: wide variation in risk tolerance amongst anaesthetists.

BACKGROUND: The variability in risk tolerance in medicine is not well understood. Parallels are often drawn between aviation and anaesthesia. The aviation industry is perceived as culturally risk averse, and part of preflight checks involves a decision on whether the flight can operate. This is sometimes termed a go/no-go decision. This questionnaire study was undertaken to explore the equivalent go/no-go decision in anaesthesia. We presented anaesthetists with a range of situations in which additional risk might be expected and asked them to decide whether they would proceed with the case. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to anaesthetic colleagues of all grades in one National Health Service Trust. Eleven scenarios, all drawn from critical incident data, were presented. Participants were invited to consider whether they would proceed, how they would modify their anaesthetic technique, and to predict whether a colleague with similar experience would make the same decision. Textual responses were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: The scenario response rate was 28%. Consultants were significantly more likely to proceed than trainees. In no scenario was there absolute agreement over whether to proceed, even in scenarios where national guidelines would suggest a case should be cancelled. Thematic analysis suggested a wide variability in what anaesthetists consider acceptable or professional behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: It is clear that safety decisions cannot be made in isolation and that clinicians must consider operational requirements, such as throughput, when making a go/no-go decision. The level of variability in decision-making was surprising, particularly for scenarios that appeared to go against guidelines.

Simulation training for dental foundation in oral and maxillofacial surgery - a new benchmark.

Simulation training involves reproducing the management of real patients in a risk-free environment. This study aims to assess the use of simulation training in the management of acutely ill patients for those in second year oral and maxillofacial surgery dental foundation training (DF2s). DF2s attended four full day courses on the recognition and treatment of acutely ill patients. These incorporated an acute life-threatening events: recognition and treatment (ALERT(™)) course, simulations of medical emergencies and case-based discussions on management of surgical inpatients. Pre- and post-course questionnaires were completed by all candidates. A maximum of 11 DF2s attended the course. The questionnaires comprised 1-10 rating scales and Likert scores. All trainees strongly agreed that they would recommend this course to colleagues and all agreed or strongly agreed that it met their learning requirements. All DF2s perceived an improvement in personal limitations, recognition of critical illness, communication, assessing acutely ill patients and initiating treatment. All participants felt their basic resuscitation skills had improved and that they had learned new skills to improve delivery of safety-critical messages. These techniques could be implemented nationwide to address the more complex educational needs for DF2s in secondary care. A new benchmark for simulation training for DF2 has been established.

Peri-operative troponin I concentration as a marker of long-term postoperative adverse cardiac outcomes--a study in high-risk surgical patients.

We have previously demonstrated that the peri-operative measurement of increased serum concentrations of the cardiac markers troponins I and T and creatine kinase-MB can be predictors of major cardiovascular outcomes (including cardiac death) at 3 months after surgery. In the present study, we have followed the postoperative course of 157 patients undergoing major vascular surgery or major joint arthroplasty to 1 year using a patient questionnaire, general practitioner follow-up and case-notes review. Increased postoperative marker concentrations were defined as values greater than the upper reference limit. Increases in troponin I and troponin T concentrations, as well as a single elevated creatine kinase-MB and two successively elevated creatine kinase-MB concentrations were measured in 12, 13, 33 and 15 patients respectively. Thirty-nine major adverse cardiac outcomes were recorded (cardiac death, myocardial ischaemia, congestive cardiac failure, unstable angina, cerebrovascular accident and major arrhythmias needing active treatment). There was no association between increases in any of these cardiac markers and cardiac death to 1 year. However, increases in troponin I and both a single elevated creatine kinase-MB and two successively elevated creatine kinase-MB concentrations were associated with an increased incidence of major cardiac outcomes, including cardiac death, to 1 year (odds ratio [95% confidence intervals] = 4.19 [1.16-14.87], 3.97 [1.65-9.44] and 5.19 [1.60-16.22], respectively).

Peri-operative silent myocardial ischaemia and long-term adverse outcomes in non-cardiac surgical patients.

Two hundred and seventy-five non-cardiac surgical patients were recruited to determine risk factors associated with the development of postoperative cardiovascular complications during the first year after surgery. Patients underwent ambulatory electrocardiography pre- and postoperatively. There were 34 adverse events over the whole study period. Twenty-four occurred within 6 months and the remaining 10 occurred between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Silent myocardial ischaemia was associated with adverse outcome over both the first 6 months [OR 4.44 (95% CI 1.77-11.13)] and the whole study period [OR 2.81 (1.26-6.07)]. Other risk factors were: vascular surgery [OR 17.09 (2.67-351.44)], history of angina [OR 6.29 (2.21-17.62)], concurrent treatment with calcium entry blockers [OR 2.68 (1.03-6.93)] and smoking [OR 4.93 (2.00-12.02)]. None of these was a useful predictor of long-term outcome (between 6 and 12 months postsurgery). These results are at variance with other published data, but we conclude that monitoring for peri-operative silent myocardial ischaemia does not aid the prediction of long-term cardiovascular complications.

Outcome effects of different protective hypothermia levels during cardiac arrest in rats.

BACKGROUND: Although hypothermia is widely used to protect the brain during cardiac and neurologic surgery, the optimal level of cooling has not been established. This study examined the protective effect of graded levels of surface cooling on cerebral function in rats after complete global cerebral ischemia. METHODS: Groups of ketamine-anesthetized rats (13 animals in each group) were cooled to cranial temperatures of 34, 30, 27, 24, or 22 degrees C before circulatory arrest. Also a normothermic (37 degrees C) group was tested. After cooling, an 11-min circulatory arrest was produced by atraumatic chest compression. Circulatory arrest was followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation and rewarming without postischemic intensive care. On the fifth postinsult day, neurologic outcome was scored on a 50-point neurodeficit scale (NDS 0 = normal). The percent of ischemic pyramidal neurons in the CA1 hippocampal region was also determined. RESULTS: There were no survivors in the normothermic group. Neurologic recovery was enhanced with 30 degrees C cranial temperature, as compared to outcome in the 34 degrees C group. Further cooling did not change outcome. The neurodeficit scales were significantly lower in all other groups compared to the 34 degrees C group on the fifth postinsult day. The percent of ischemic neurons did not change significantly as a function of cooling, but the lowest count appeared at 27 degrees C. CONCLUSION: In this model, moderate (30 degrees C) cooling improved neurologic outcome. There was no additional benefit from more extreme hypothermia.