ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is emerging as an effective treatment oncologically and functionally for clinically localized renal tumors. However, RAPN in high-complexity tumors with a Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical score ≥10 remains challenging. In this study, the feasibility of RAPN for high-complexity tumors was assessed. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 177 cases with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma who had undergone RAPN at our hospital from July 2010 to February 2018. They were assessed for perioperative parameters and trifecta achievement (ie, negative surgical margins, warm ischemia time <25 minutes, and no complications). RESULTS: Among the 177 cases who had undergone RAPN, 60 had high-complexity tumors, and 117 had non-high-complexity (ie, intermediate- or low-complexity) tumors. There were no significant differences in the operative and console times between the cohorts, but estimated intraoperative blood loss was much lower in the non-high-complexity group. Although the average warm ischemia time was less than 25 minutes in both groups, it was significantly shorter in the non-high-complexity group. Trifecta achievement rates significantly differed between the high- and non-high-complexity groups (68.3% vs 86.3%). Comparisons of four operative parameters (ie, BMI, tumor size, endophytic properties, and hilar tumor) using univariate analysis in the 60 high-complexity tumor cases showed that BMI and tumor size were independent factors (P = 0.05 and 0.018, respectively). In multivariate analysis, tumor size was the only factor directly associated with trifecta achievement (P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: The trifecta achievement rate was significantly lower in the high-complexity group. Only tumor size affected trifecta achievement during RAPN in cases with high-complexity tumors (Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical score ≥10).
Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Nephrectomy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is one of the most widely used procedures for localized prostate cancer (PCa). In the present study, the clinical and oncological outcomes of RARP with bilateral or unilateral nerve sparing (NS) for D'Amico high-risk PCa cases were assessed. Among the 767 cases who received RARP at Fujita Health University Hospital between August 2009 and December 2016, 230 high-risk PCa cases who were observed for >6 months comprised the retrospective study cohort. Bilateral NS was performed with the bilateral neurovascular bundle in eight, unilateral in 125 and none in 97 cases. Perioperative parameters [surgery time, console time, estimated blood loss, pathological stage, positive lymph node metastases [pN (+)], and surgical margin positivity] did not exhibit significant differences between the NS and non-NS cohorts. During a median follow-up time of 25 months, the 1- and 3-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rates in the NS/non-NS cohorts were 84.4/86.0 and 72.7/75.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences identified between the two groups at each time period. According to multivariate analysis, the resection margin was an important factor for time to BCR, regardless of the NS technique used. The numbers of pads used daily at 3 and 6 months after RARP between the NS/non-NS cohorts were 1.1/1.5 and 0.6/1.0, respectively (P=0.045 and P=0.009), suggesting that the NS technique resulted in significantly improved outcomes regarding urinary continence recovery. In selected high-risk PCa cases, the NS technique resulted in equivalent oncological outcomes and improved urinary continence compared with the non-NS RARP group.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: For the management of patients with small renal tumor, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) provides similar oncological control as radical nephrectomy (RN) and is superior to RN with respect to preserving renal function and preventing chronic kidney disease (CKD). The challenge of LPN is to resect a tumor in a bloodless field within a limited warm ischemia time (WIT) , followed by hemostatic renorrhaphy under restricted movement of laparoscopic forceps. Therefore, LPN still remains challenging to even experienced laparoscopic surgeon. DaVinci device improved the movability of forceps in LPN and provided three-dimensional visualization. We evaluated outcome and safety of our first series of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) for localized kidney tumor. There was no previous report of RALPN undertaken in our country. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since August 2010, our team carried out RALPN for a total of five cases of renal tumor. There were four males and one female with an age range of 41 to 65 years-old. Size of tumor ranged from 15 to 28 mm, located in exophytic region, and four cases in right side and one in left. RALPN was undertaken by single surgeon through transperitoneal approach in two cases and retroperitoneal in tree. RESULTS: RALPN was completed in all patients without conversion to open or hand-assisted surgery. The median operative time and the estimated blood loss were 189 minutes, ranged from 150 to 264, and 29 ml, from 10 to 50, respectively. The median volume of removed tumor and the length of WIT were 7 g, ranged from 4 to 13 g, and 18 minutes, from 13 to 26 minutes, respectively. No complications or reoperations were associated during or post our RALPN cases. Pathological examination of removed tumor showed renal cell carcinoma with negative surgical margin in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of daVinci device to LPN made this procedure, RALPN, a secured and promising one, which leading to shorten the WIT and to achieve satisfied renorrhaphy. Even for the complex and technically challenging renal tumors, robotic assistance is expected to provide patients the benefit of minimally invasive surgery with safety and satisfactory renal function.
