ABSTRACT
The effect of high-flow pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass was evaluated in 36 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in our unit. The patients were divided into two groups, based on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) flow; high (3.0 +/- 0.2 l/min/m2), or moderate (2.4 +/- 0.2 l/min/m2). Multidose cold crystalloid cardioplegia was administered for myocardial protection. Pulsatile flow during CPB was used and systemic perfusion pressure was maintained between 50 and 80 mmHg. Preoperatively, there were no differences between groups in left ventricular ejection fraction or extent of coronary artery disease. The times required for CPB and weaning from CPB were significantly shorter in high-flow group than moderate-flow group. The urinary output during CPB was significantly higher in high-flow group than moderate-flow group. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or 30-day mortality between groups. In conclusion, high-flow pulsatile CPB shortens the length of CPB and does not differ significantly from moderate-flow with respect to mortality and morbidity.
