Lung injury following thoracic aortic occlusion: comparison of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Halogenated anaesthetics have been shown to reduce ischaemia-reperfusion injuries in various organs due to pre- and post-conditioning mechanisms. We compared volatile and total intravenous anaesthesia with regard to their effect on remote pulmonary injury after thoracic aortic occlusion and reperfusion. METHODS: Eighteen pigs were randomized after sternotomy and laparotomy (fentanyl-midazolam anaesthesia) to receive either sevoflurane or propofol in an investigator-blinded fashion. Ninety minutes of thoracic aortic occlusion was induced by a balloon catheter. During reperfusion, a goal-directed resuscitation protocol was performed. After 120 min of reperfusion, the anaesthetic regimen was changed to fentanyl-midazolam again for another 180 min. The oxygenation index and intra-pulmonary shunt fractions were calculated. After 5 h of reperfusion, a bronchoalveolar lavage was performed. The total protein content and lactate dehydrogenase activity were measured in epithelial lining fluid (ELF). Alveolar macrophage oxidative burst was analysed. The wet to dry ratio was calculated and tissue injury was graded using a semi-quantitative score. Ten animals (n=5 for each anaesthetic) without aortic occlusion served as time controls. RESULTS: The oxygenation index decreased and the intra-pulmonary shunt fraction increased significantly in both occlusion groups. There were no significant differences between sevoflurane and propofol with respect to the oxygenation index, ELF composition, morphologic lung damage, wet to dry ratio and alveolar macrophage burst activity. Differences were, however, seen in terms of systemic haemodynamic stability, where catecholamine requirements were less pronounced with sevoflurane. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the severity of remote lung injury was not different between sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia in this porcine model of severe lower-body ischaemia and reperfusion injury.

Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on ischaemia-reperfusion injury after thoracic-aortic occlusion in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Thoraco-abdominal-aneurysm surgery predicts high mortality. Propofol and sevoflurane are commonly used anaesthetics for this procedure. Halogenated anaesthetics induce organ protection similar to ischaemic preconditioning. We investigated which anaesthetic regimen would lead to a better protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injury induced by temporary thoracic-aortic occlusion. METHODS: Following initial fentanyl-midazolam anaesthesia for surgical preparation, 18 pigs were randomly assigned to two groups: group one received propofol (n=9) and group two sevoflurane (n=9) before, during, and after lower body ischaemia in an investigator blinded fashion. Ten animals without aortic occlusion served as time controls (propofol, n=5; sevoflurane, n=5). For induction of ischaemia, the thoracic aorta was occluded by a balloon-catheter for 90 min. After 120 min of reperfusion, the study anaesthetics were discontinued and fentanyl-midazolam re-established for an additional 180 min. Goal-directed therapy was performed during reperfusion. Fluid and catecholamine requirements were assessed. Serum samples and intestinal tissue specimens were obtained. RESULTS: Severe declamping shock occurred in both study groups. While norepinephrine requirements in the sevoflurane group were significantly reduced during reperfusion (P<0.05), allowing cessation of catecholamine support in 4/9 animals, all 9/9 animals were still catecholamine dependent at the end of the experiment in the propofol group. Serum activities of lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate transaminase, and alanine aminotransferase were lower with sevoflurane (P<0.05). Small intestine tissue specimens did not differ histologically. CONCLUSIONS: Use of sevoflurane compared with propofol attenuated the haemodynamic sequelae of reperfusion injury in our model. Release of serum markers of cellular injury was also attenuated.