Water-mediated phase transformations of posaconazole: An intricate jungle of crystal forms.

Posaconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent exhibiting rich polymorphism. Up to now, a total of fourteen different crystal forms have been reported, sometimes with an ambiguous nomenclature, but less is known about their properties and stability relationships. Investigating the solid-state of a drug compound is essential to identify the most stable form under working conditions and to prevent the risk of undesired solid-phase transformations under processing and storage. In this paper, we study posaconazole polymorphism by providing a description of its polymorphs, hydrates, and solvates. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), dynamic vapor sorption (DVS), spectroscopic and thermal techniques were employed to characterize the different forms. In addition, the solid-phase transformations of posaconazole in aqueous suspensions were studied by means of Raman microscopy. Surprisingly, we found that Form S, the crystal form contained in the marketed oral suspension, is not the most stable form in water. Form S readily converts to a more stable hydrate, i.e. Form A, after storage in water for two weeks. In the commercial oral formulation the conversion between the two forms is prevented by the presence of polysorbate 80. Such insights into the stabilizing excipient effects beyond particle dispersion are critical to formulators.

Exploring the Cocrystal Landscape of Posaconazole by Combining High-Throughput Screening Experimentation with Computational Chemistry.

The development of multicomponent crystal forms, such as cocrystals, represents a means to enhance the dissolution and absorption properties of poorly water-soluble drug compounds. However, the successful discovery of new pharmaceutical cocrystals remains a time- and resource-consuming process. This study proposes the use of a combined computational-experimental high-throughput approach as a tool to accelerate and improve the efficiency of cocrystal screening exemplified by posaconazole. First, we employed the COSMOquick software to preselect and rank cocrystal candidates (coformers). Second, high-throughput crystallization experiments (HTCS) were conducted on the selected coformers. The HTCS results were successfully reproduced by liquid-assisted grinding and reaction crystallization, ultimately leading to the synthesis of thirteen new posaconazole cocrystals (7 anhydrous, 5 hydrates, and 1 solvate). The posaconazole cocrystals were characterized by PXRD, 1H NMR, Fourier transform-Raman, thermogravimetry-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. In addition, the prediction performance of COSMOquick was compared to that of two alternative knowledge-based methods: molecular complementarity (MC) and hydrogen bond propensity (HBP). Although HBP does not perform better than random guessing for this case study, both MC and COSMOquick show good discriminatory ability, suggesting their use as a potential virtual tool to improve cocrystal screening.

The crystalline state of methylene blue: a zoo of hydrates.

A re-investigation of the crystalline state of methylene blue has led to the identification of five different hydrates with clearly distinct structures. These include the already known pentahydrate, a hydrate with 2.2-2.3 equivalents of water, two dihydrates, and a monohydrate. Contrary to older reports, no trihydrate was found. The preparation and characterization of the hydrates as well as the transformations between them are reported. The applied analytical methods include X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR), thermogravimetry (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic water vapor sorption (DVS) and solution calorimetry (SolCal). A phase diagram of temperature vs. composition has been established, and the stability domains of the different hydrates as a function of water activity and temperature have been determined based on data from DSC, SolCal and suspension equilibration experiments. Four out of the five hydrates are thermodynamically stable within a certain range of temperature and humidity.

Ultraviolet protection factors for clothing: an intercomparison of measurement systems.

In recent years the need to standardize measurement protocols for quantifying the degree of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) protection provided by clothing has led to the introduction of a number of standards around the world. To date, these standards have specified spectral measurements of UVR transmission by clothing and fabrics. Development of a standard test method has become an important part of the testing process, and this article presents results from an intercomparison involving 10 independent testing laboratories and 11 different UVR transmission measurement instruments. In addition to comparing the measured ultraviolet protection factors (UPF), this intercomparison also incorporates detailed scan results from all 10 laboratories and highlights differences in performance of the various instruments in different wavelength regions. Careful examination of these differences can indicate where changes to the systems could be made to allow improvements both in equipment performance and in agreement of the final results. The variability in the measurements of UPF in this study suggest that the protection categories in standards may need to be broadened.