Validity of the InBody 520™ to predict metabolic rate in apparently healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: The present study seeks to assess the validity of the InBody 520™ device to predict RMR in apparently healthy adults relative to a metabolic cart (the standard, yet time-intensive, method for determining resting metabolic rate). METHODS: Twenty-six apparently healthy adults participated in the study. Predicted RMR (pRMR) was calculated by the InBody 520™ and measured RMR (mRMR) was determined by 30-minute gas analysis and ventilated hood system. Of the 78 measurement trials conducted, 64 yielded acceptable measurement trials. RESULTS: A Pearson product-moment correlation was used to determine the relationship between pRMR and mRMR (r=0.87, P<0.001). No significant difference existed between the pRMR (1650.89±295.96 kcal) and mRMR (1675.36±278.69 kcal) values (P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest that the InBody520™ provides valid measurements of RMR in apparently healthy adults and can be an effective and efficient method for collecting data in a clinical setting.

The Acute Effects of Nonstimulant Over-the-Counter Dietary Herbal Supplements on Resting Metabolic Rate.

BACKGROUND: Weight loss supplements are widely advertised and highly sought out products. Many supplements claim to increase body fat utilization, increase resting metabolic rate (RMR), and to improve body composition by decreasing total body fat composition. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the acute effect of nonstimulant herbal supplements on RMR and substrate utilization. METHODS: Ten female and 16 male participants (mean age 23.7 ± 3.9 years; mean weight 79.2 ± 18.2 kg) completed a random-repeated measures crossover study. Participants completed a total of three RMRs by either ingesting a placebo (P) or one of two supplements [raspberry ketones (R) or metabolic activator blend (MAB)] 2 hours prior to testing. RESULTS: No significant difference was found for RMR for P vs. MAB (p = .130), vs. R (p = .588), and MAB vs. R (p = .636). No significant difference was found for respiratory quotient for P vs. MAB (p = .056), vs. R (p = .149), and MAB vs. R (p = .764). No significant difference was found for substrate utilization: percent carbohydrate utilization, P vs. MAB (p = .052), P vs. R (p = .124), and MAB vs. R (p = .680); and percent fat utilization, P vs. MAB (p = .052), P vs. R (p = .120), and MAB vs. R (p = .749). CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, nonstimulant weight loss supplements may not be beneficial for weight loss, or an increase of fat utilization.