SYNERGY-Everolimus-Eluting Stent With a Bioabsorbable Polymer in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: CLEAR SYNERGY OASIS-9 Registry.

Our objective was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the SYNERGY stent (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The only drug-eluting stent approved for treatment of STEMI by the Food and Drug Administration is the Taxus stent (Boston Scientific) which is no longer commercially available, so further data are needed. The CLEAR (Colchicine and spironolactone in patients with myocardial infarction) SYNERGY stent registry was embedded into a larger randomized trial of patients with STEMI (n = 7,000), comparing colchicine versus placebo and spironolactone versus placebo. The primary outcome for the SYNERGY stent registry is major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as defined by cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, or unplanned ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization within 12 months. We estimated a MACE rate of 6.3% at 12 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI based on the Thrombectomy vs percutaneous coronary intervention alone in STEMI (TOTAL) trial. Success was defined as upper bound of confidence interval (CI) to be less than the performance goal of 9.45%. Overall, 733 patients were enrolled from 8 countries with a mean age 60 years, 19.4% diabetes mellitus, 41.3% anterior MI, and median door-to-balloon time of 72 minutes. The MACE rate was 4.8% (95% CI 3.2 to 6.3%) at 12 months which met the success criteria against performance goal of 9.45%. The rates of cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, or target vessel revascularization were 2.7%, 1.9%, 1.0%, respectively. The rates of acute definite stent thrombosis were 0.3%, subacute 0.4%, late 0.4%, and cumulative stent thrombosis of 1.1% at 12 months. In conclusion, the SYNERGY stent in STEMI performed well and was successful compared with the performance goal based on previous trials.

Adherence to Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines in an Academic Centre.

Background: Adherence to guidelines is associated with better patient outcomes. Although studies show suboptimal adherence to cardiovascular prevention guidelines among general practitioners, adherence among specialist physicians is understudied. The aim of this analysis was to identify practice gaps among cardiologists in a tertiary academic centre. Methods: We retrospectively audited cardiology outpatient clinic notes taken at the Cardiology Clinic at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), from the period January 1, 2019 to February 28, 2019. Data were abstracted from hospital medical records. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of adherence to cardiovascular prevention guidelines. We compared the chart-documented practice at our centre to the Canadian hypertension, lipid, diabetes, antiplatelet, and heart failure guidelines in effect at the time of the audit. We also collected information regarding discussions of smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and diet. Results: A total of 2503 patients were included, with a mean age of 65.6 ± 14.5 years. Dyslipidemia occurred in 63% of patients, hypertension in 55%, and coronary artery disease in 41%. Optimal low-density lipoprotein control was documented as having been achieved in just 39% of cases. Blood pressure control was adequate for 65% of patients, and glycemic control was achieved in 47% of patients with diabetes. Heart failure treatment was optimal in 34% of patients. Nearly all patients with coronary artery disease (95%) had appropriate antithrombotic therapy. The incidence of discussion of nonpharmacologic interventions varied, ranging from 91% (smoking) to 16% (diet). Conclusions: Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events was found to be suboptimal in an academic tertiary-care outpatient cardiology clinic and may be representative of similar shortcomings nationwide. Strategies to ensure guideline adherence are needed.

Contexte: Le respect des lignes directrices est associé à de meilleurs résultats pour les patients. Bien que les études montrent que les omnipraticiens adhèrent de façon sous-optimale aux lignes directrices en matière de prévention des événements cardiovasculaires, l'observance chez les médecins spécialistes n'a pas été assez étudiée. Notre analyse a pour objectif de déceler les lacunes dans la pratique des cardiologues exerçant dans des centres universitaires de soins tertiaires. Méthodologie: Nous avons examiné de manière rétrospective les notes cliniques consignées au dossier des patients du Centre cardiovasculaire du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) et résumé les données issues des consultations ayant eu lieu du 1er janvier au 28 février 2019. Le principal résultat d'intérêt était le taux d'adhésion aux lignes directrices en matière de prévention des événements cardiovasculaires. Nous avons comparé les pratiques enregistrées dans les dossiers de notre centre aux lignes directrices canadiennes sur la prise en charge de l'hypertension, de la lipidémie, du diabète, du traitement antiplaquettaire et de l'insuffisance cardiaque en place au moment de l'évaluation. Nous avons aussi recueilli de l'information sur les discussions entourant le tabagisme, la consommation d'alcool, l'activité physique et l'alimentation. Résultats: Les données de 2 503 patients, âgés en moyenne de 65,6 ± 14,5 ans, ont été retenues. De ces patients, 63 % présentaient une dyslipidémie, 55 %, une hypertension et 41 %, une maladie coronarienne. Le taux de lipoprotéines de basse densité n'était maîtrisé de façon optimale que dans 39 % des cas. La normalisation de la pression artérielle était adéquate chez 65 % des patients, et 47 % des patients diabétiques atteignaient les cibles glycémiques. L'insuffisance cardiaque était optimalement traitée chez 34 % des patients. Presque tous les patients atteints de maladie coronarienne (95 %) recevaient un traitement antithrombotique approprié. La fréquence des discussions sur les interventions non pharmacologiques variait, allant de 91 % dans le cas du tabagisme à 16 % dans celui de l'alimentation. Conclusions: La prévention primaire et secondaire des événements cardiovasculaires s'est révélée sous-optimale dans une clinique externe de cardiologie d'un hôpital universitaire et pourrait être représentative de lacunes similaires dans l'ensemble du pays. Des stratégies visant à assurer le respect des lignes directrices sont nécessaires.

Treatment of Calcified Lesions Using a Dedicated Super-High Pressure Balloon: Multicenter Optical Coherence Tomography Registry.

BACKGROUND: Calcified lesions often lead to difficulty achieving optimal stent expansion. OPN non-compliant (NC) is a twin layer balloon with high rated burst pressure that may modify calcium effectively. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter registry in patients undergoing optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided intervention with OPN NC. Superficial calcification with > 180o arc and > 0.5 mm thickness, and/or nodular calcification with > 90o arc were included. OCT was performed in all cases before and after OPN NC, and after intervention. Primary efficacy endpoints were frequency of expansion (EXP) ≥80 % of the mean reference lumen area and mean final EXP by OCT, and secondary endpoints were calcium fractures (CF), and EXP ≥90 %. RESULTS: 50 cases were included; 25 (50 %) superficial, and 25 (50 %) nodular. Calcium score of 4 in 42 (84 %) cases and 3 in 8 (16 %). OPN NC was used alone, or after other devices if further modification was needed, NC in 27 (54 %), cutting in 29 (58 %), scoring in 1 (2 %), IVL in 2 (4 %); or if non-crossable lesion, rotablation in 5 (10 %) cases. EXP ≥80 % was achieved in 40 (80 %) cases with mean final EXP post intervention of 85.7 % ± 8.9. CF were documented in 49 (98 %) cases; multiple in 37 (74 %). There were 1 flow limiting dissection requiring stent deployment and 3 non-cardiovascular related deaths in 6 months follow-up. No records of perforation, no-reflow or other major adverse events. CONCLUSION: Among patients with heavy calcified lesions undergoing OCT guided intervention with OPN NC, acceptable expansion was achieved in most cases without procedure related complications.

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Post-Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicates 5%-10% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is the leading cause of early mortality. It remains unclear whether percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) devices improve post-AMI CS outcome. METHODS: A systematic review of original studies comparing the effect of pMCS on AMI-CS mortality was conducted with the use of Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases. RESULTS: Of 8672 records, 50 were retained for quantitative analysis. Four additional references were added from other sources. Four references reported a significant mortality reduction with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with failed primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or managed with thrombolysis. Meta-analyses showed no advantage of Impella over conventional therapy (pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.20-1.46; I2 = 0.85) and increased mortality compared with IABP (pooled OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.62; I2 = 0.85). No study reported a mortality advantage for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) over conventional therapy, IABP, or Impella support. Early mortality might be improved with the addition of IABP or Impella to ECMO. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 3 bleeding was increased with every pMCS strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence is of poor to moderate quality, with only 1 in 5 included articles reporting randomised data and several reporting unadjusted outcomes. Yet, there is some evidence to favour IABP use in the setting of thrombolysis or with failed pPCI, and adding IABP or Impella should be considered for patients requiring ECMO.

Clinical profiles and outcomes of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young adults in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical profiles and outcomes of young adults presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, registry between January 2016 and November 2017 for all patients younger than 45 years old who were admitted with STEMI. We compared this study population to a control group of patients aged 45 years and older who were enrolled in the same period. RESULTS: In total, 402 patients were enrolled; 197 were younger than 45 years. The incidence of newly diagnosed dyslipidemia was higher in younger patients (44% vs. 32%, p=0.01). Smoking was significantly more prevalent in the younger group (52% vs. 35%, p=0.001). The prevalence of pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock on presentation was significantly higher in the older group (3% vs. 10; odds ratio, 4.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.750-10.94; p=0.002). Hospital stay was also longer in the older group (4±2 vs. 5±2 days, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young patients has a favorable outcome. Smoking and dyslipidemia are the main risk factors for STEMI in young individuals. The majority of young patients with dyslipidemia were not aware of their pre-existing condition. Our findings recommend local adaptation and implementation of screening programs for dyslipidemia in the young and the reinforcement of smoking prevention programs.

Safety and Performance of the Orsiro Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of All-Comers Patient Population in Daily Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: The BIOFLOW-III Canada registry aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with biodegradable polymer, in an all-comers patient population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, observational all-comers registry of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with Orsiro SES at two high-volume Canadian centers. The primary endpoint was one-year target lesion failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass grafting and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Four subgroups were pre-defined: i) diabetic patients; ii) small vessels (≤2.75 mm); iii) chronic total occlusions (CTO) and iv) acute MI. RESULTS: From May 2014 to July 2016, 250 patients (mean age 66.2 ± 10.8 years, 75.6% males, 30% diabetes) underwent PCI with Orsiro SES for 385 coronary lesions. The mean stent diameter was 2.98 ± 0.50 mm and the mean stent length was 22 ± 8 mm. Clinical device and procedural success rates were with 99.5% and 97.6%, respectively. The overall one-year TLF rate was 2.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-5.8%], whereas TLF rates were 4.1% [95%CI 1.3-12.2%], 3.2% [95%CI 1.2-8.4%], 8.3% [95%CI 2.2-29.4%], and 2.6% [95%CI 0.7-9.9%] in patients with diabetes, small vessels, CTO, and acute MI, respectively. One case of possible stent thrombosis (ST) was reported (0.4% [95%CI 0.1-2.8%]), while no cases of definite/probable ST was observed at one year. CONCLUSION: Our data provide further evidence of the safety and clinical performance of Orsiro SES in an unselected, real-world, complex patient population. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The BIOFLOW-III Canada registry is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, observational all-comers registry designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the Orsiro SES in non-selected, real-world patients. A total of 250 patients (mean age 66.2 ± 10.8 years, 75.6% males, 30% diabetes) who underwent PCI with Orsiro SES, were enrolled at two high-volume Canadian centers. The overall rate of TLF at one year was 2.8% [95%CI 1.4-5.8%], whereas TLF rates were 4.1%, 3.2%, 8.3%, and 2.6% in patients with diabetes, small vessels ≤2.75 mm, CTO, and acute MI, respectively. No case of definite/probable ST was observed.

Cardiovascular Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Perspective.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), represents the pandemic of the century, with approximately 3.5 million cases and 250,000 deaths worldwide as of May 2020. Although respiratory symptoms usually dominate the clinical presentation, COVID-19 is now known to also have potentially serious cardiovascular consequences, including myocardial injury, myocarditis, acute coronary syndromes, pulmonary embolism, stroke, arrhythmias, heart failure, and cardiogenic shock. The cardiac manifestations of COVID-19 might be related to the adrenergic drive, systemic inflammatory milieu and cytokine-release syndrome caused by SARS-CoV-2, direct viral infection of myocardial and endothelial cells, hypoxia due to respiratory failure, electrolytic imbalances, fluid overload, and side effects of certain COVID-19 medications. COVID-19 has profoundly reshaped usual care of both ambulatory and acute cardiac patients, by leading to the cancellation of elective procedures and by reducing the efficiency of existing pathways of urgent care, respectively. Decreased use of health care services for acute conditions by non-COVID-19 patients has also been reported and attributed to concerns about acquiring in-hospital infection. Innovative approaches that leverage modern technologies to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic have been introduced, which include telemedicine, dissemination of educational material over social media, smartphone apps for case tracking, and artificial intelligence for pandemic modelling, among others. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology and cardiovascular implications of COVID-19, its impact on existing pathways of care, the role of modern technologies to tackle the pandemic, and a proposal of novel management algorithms for the most common acute cardiac conditions.