Decision Tree for the Performance of Intraoperative Liver Biopsy During Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bariatric surgery provides a useful opportunity to perform intraoperative liver biopsy to screen for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). There is currently no consensus on whether intraoperative liver biopsy should be systematically performed. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a decision tree to guide that choice. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This prospective study included 102 consecutive patients from the severe obesity outcome network (SOON) cohort in whom liver biopsy was systematically performed during bariatric surgery. A classification and regression tree (CART) was created to identify the nodes that best classified patients with and without NASH. External validation was performed. Seventy-one biopsies were of sufficient quality for analysis (median body mass index 43.3 [40.7; 48.0] kg/m2). NASH was diagnosed in 32.4% of cases. None of the patients with no steatosis on ultrasound had NASH. The only CART node that differentiated between a "high-risk" and a "low-risk" of NASH was alanine aminotransferase (ALT). ALT>53IU/L predicted NASH with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 68% and a negative predictive value (NPP) of 89%, a sensitivity of 77%, and a specificity of 84%. In the external cohort (n=258), PPV was 68%, NPV was 62%, sensitivity was 27%, and specificity was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The present work supports intraoperative liver biopsy to screen for NASH in patients with ALT>53IU/L; however, patients with no steatosis on ultrasound should not undergo biopsy. The CART failed to identify an algorithm with a good sensitivity to screen for NASH in patients with ultrasonography-proven steatosis and ALT≤53IU/L.

Analysis of medical prescribing practices for hepatitis B serology tests.

The aim of this survey was to study the requests written for hepatitis B virus (HBV) serology tests to ascertain their compliance with French prescription guidelines; additional costs incurred by inappropriate requests were also determined, as was the appropriateness of the physicians' interpretation of the test results. This was a cross-sectional practice inquiry involving 118 prescriptions for HBV serology tests. Data were prospectively collected in June 2005 from laboratory heads and prescribing physicians. The prescriptions were written for 188 patients (64% women), aged 35 years on average, mostly by general practitioners (65%) and gynecologists (25%). Prescribing physicians reported the following clinical situations as their main reasons for ordering HBV serology tests: pregnancy (25%); vaccination (20%); acute hepatitis (18%) and screening a patient with a risk factor (19%). Failure to comply with current guidelines was noted in 74% of the prescriptions and vague wording in 45%. The additional cost due to ordering inappropriate serology tests was 43.41 euro per prescription. The physician's interpretation of the test results was considered excellent (27%), fair (59%) or false (14%). Guidelines for the prescribing of hepatitis B serology tests need to be more rigorously applied in daily clinical practice. City hospital networks should promote further in-service training for physicians.

Longitudinal evaluation of a fibrosis index combining MMP-1 and PIIINP compared with MMP-9, TIMP-1 and hyaluronic acid in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated by interferon-alpha and ribavirin.

We have recently described a fibrosis index combining serum procollagen type III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP) and matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) concentrations for evaluating the amount of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients. The aims of the present study were to validate this score in another cohort of patients and to assess its variations along those of TIMP-1, hyaluronic acid (HA) and MMP-9 during antiviral treatment. Seventy-nine patients treated by interferon-alpha and ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks were included. A liver biopsy was performed within the 6 months before the start of treatment. Serum markers were measured in serum collected the day of the liver biopsy, at start of treatment, and every 3 months during treatment and a 6-month follow-up period. The PIIINP/MMP-1 index was significantly correlated to the METAVIR fibrosis (r = 0.68, P < 0.001). Its overall diagnostic value defined by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves was 0.77 for discriminating F1 vs F2F3F4, and 0.81 for discriminating F1F2 vs F3F4, and was better than that observed for HA and TIMP-1. At the end of follow-up, the PIIINP/MMP-1 index significantly decreased in responders and remained stable in nonresponder patients. This decrease occurred early and continued regularly during the treatment period. This variation was because of both a decrease of PIIINP and an increase of MMP-1 concentrations. HA and TIMP-1 serum concentrations were also significantly lower at the end of follow-up in responder patients, but early changes were minimal and not influenced by the response to treatment. Our study shows that a noninvasive index combining PIIINP and MMP-1 is a useful tool to follow-up fibrosis change during and after antiviral therapy chronic hepatitis C patients.