Drug interactions between antiretrovirals and hormonal contraceptives.

INTRODUCTION: Significant advances in antiretroviral therapy have transformed HIV into a chronic manageable disease, and millions of women living with HIV now have the opportunity to reconsider their reproductive choices, be it contraception or pregnancy planning. Hormonal contraceptives are metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes and sulfate and glucuronide conjugation in the liver. Many antiretrovirals have inducing or inhibiting effects on the cytochrome P450 system. As such, the pharmacokinetics of hormonal contraceptives can be affected by antiretroviral therapy with potential for significant clinical impact. AREAS COVERED: This article presents the pharmacology and metabolism of selected antiretrovirals and hormonal contraceptives, and highlights the potential interactions between these two classes of drugs. Furthermore, the authors present the pharmacokinetic evidence of interactions from available clinical trials, product monographs, and international conference abstracts. EXPERT OPINION: Drugs most likely to interact with combined oral contraceptives, transdermal and implant contraceptives include protease inhibitors, the NNRTIs efavirenz and nevirapine, and cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir. There do not appear to be significant pharmacokinetic interactions with depo-medroxyprogesterone or intrauterine systems and antiretrovirals, although further study is needed. Clinicians working with HIV-positive women need to know the significance of these interactions in order to properly counsel patients and prevent unplanned pregnancies.

Protease inhibitor-associated QT interval prolongation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the literature on protease inhibitor (PI)-associated QT interval prolongation and risk for torsade de pointes in patients infected by HIV. DATA SOURCES: Primary literature was identified through MEDLINE (1950-August 2011) and EMBASE (1980-August 2011), using the following search terms: antiretroviral agents, HIV, protease inhibitors, QTc, QT prolongation, and torsade de pointes. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language case reports of antiretroviral therapy-associated QT interval prolongation, studies of healthy volunteers, or studies that evaluated the impact of PIs on QT interval in patients infected with HIV were reviewed and selected. Article bibliographies and conference abstracts were also reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Several case reports, as well as in vitro data, have implicated PIs as a potential cause of QT interval prolongation and/or torsade de pointes. Saquinavir, therapeutically boosted with the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir, was the only PI shown to be associated with significant QT interval prolongation in studies with healthy volunteers. While 1 case control study in HIV-infected patients found that nelfinavir or efavirenz, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, increased the risk of QT interval prolongation, larger prospective studies have not demonstrated any significant increase in QT interval following exposure to PIs. Similar risk factors for QT interval prolongation seen in non-HIV-infected patients, such as older age, female sex, ethnicity, cardiac conditions, diabetes mellitus, and concomitant use of other QT interval-prolonging medications, especially methadone, were risk factors identified in studies of HIV-infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: PIs do not appear to independently predispose patients to QT interval prolongation. However, other risk factors (both HIV-related and non-HIV-related) may increase the risk of QT interval prolongation. Available data suggest that baseline and follow-up electrocardiogram monitoring are unnecessary precautions, but may be considered in patients who are initiating PI therapy and are on multiple medications with proarrhythmic potential and/or have multiple comorbidities, increasing the risk.

Drug-drug interaction between itraconazole and the protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of therapeutic drug monitoring of lopinavir/ritonavir and itraconazole concentrations in an HIV-infected male who was treated for histoplasmosis. CASE SUMMARY: A 34-year-old HIV-infected man who had recently initiated efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy was diagnosed with disseminated Histoplasma capsulatum infection. In the hospital, lopinavir/ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg twice daily replaced efavirenz to avoid efavirenz-itraconazole interactions. After 14 days of liposomal amphotericin B therapy, itraconazole solution was initiated at 150 mg twice daily for 3 days, followed by 200 mg daily. Prior to itraconazole initiation, lopinavir trough concentration was 7.4 mg/L. The lopinavir trough concentration 15 days later, after 14 days of itraconazole, was 6.8 mg/L. An itraconazole concentration measured 2 hours post-dose on day 15 of oral therapy was 1.9 microg/mL. After 2 weeks of liposomal amphotericin, urine Histoplasma antigen was 27.23 ng/mL; after 5 months of oral itraconazole therapy, it decreased to 5.24 ng/mL. Plasma HIV RNA decreased 4.26 log(10) in 5 months to less than 40 copies/mL. The patient has demonstrated marked clinical improvement. DISCUSSION: In this case, dosing recommendations of itraconazole 200 mg daily with lopinavir/ritonavir were appropriate. Lopinavir trough concentrations were not significantly different following the addition of itraconazole and were above the minimum target of 1 mg/L in treatment-naïve patients. The itraconazole concentration was above the recommended concentration of at least 1 microg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The dose of itraconazole was reduced to 200 mg daily as recommended by current guidelines, and therapeutic drug monitoring of both itraconazole and lopinavir concentrations confirmed that no further dosage adjustments were necessary.