Attachment and proliferation of bovine aortic endothelial cells onto additive modified poly(ether urethane ureas).

To better understand endothelial cell interactions with poly(ether urethane urea) (PEUU) materials, and to assess bovine aortic endothelial cell attachment, films were incubated for 24 h with BAEC in media containing 5% fetal bovine serum. Other films were allowed to incubate for 4 more days in media containing 5% fetal bovine serum without cells to assess BAEC proliferation. The assay was performed on PEUU films modified with acrylate and methacrylate polymer and copolymer additives that spanned a wide range on the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity scale. Tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) was used as a control. The assay showed that PEUU films loaded with Methacrol 2138F [copoly(diisopropylaminoethyl methacrylate [DI-PAM]/decyl methacrylate [DM]) (3/1)] or with its hydrophilic component, DIPAM, in homopolymer form (i.e., h-DIPAM), significantly enhanced BAEC attachment (approximately 80% of TCPS values) and proliferation (approximately 80%) when compared to unloaded PEUU films (attachment 73%; proliferation, 47%) or to PEUU films loaded with the more hydrophobic acrylate or methacrylate polymer additives (attachment, 32-69%; proliferation, 18-57%). The assay also showed that PEUU films coated with homopoly(diisopropylaminoethyl acrylate) (h-DIPAA) significantly enhanced BAEC attachment and proliferation when compared to PEUU films coated with h-decyl acrylate (h-DA); films coated with the copolymer of these two acrylates (i.e., co-[DIPAA/DA] [3/1]) showed intermediate behavior. To explain the enhancement of BAEC interaction with films loaded with Methacrol 2138F or h-DIPAM, when compared to unmodified PEUU films or to PEUU films loaded with more hydrophobic acrylate and methacrylate polymer additives, it was assumed that the additives near the surface region of the solvent swollen PEUU matrix may have migrated to, or near to, the PEUU-air interface during film formation, creating an additive enriched PEUU surface region. It is suggested that, once at this surface region, dynamic reorientation in response to an aqueous medium ensured the additives were able significantly to influence protein adsorption, and concomitant endothelial cell behavior, but only if they interacted with aqueous media more favorably than the PEUU. The ability of Methacrol and h-DIPAM additives to enhance endothelial cell behavior is argued to be the result of increased hydrophilicity. This is the result of exposed, hydrogen-bonding DIPAM moieties and increased surface flexibility, which is itself due to the hydration of unhindered Methacrol chains, which may create an additive enriched PEUU-water interfacial zone.

Protein adsorption and endothelial cell attachment and proliferation on PAPI-based additive modified poly(ether urethane ureas).

To better understand vascular interactions with poly(ether urethane urea) (PEUU) materials, protein adsorption, and endothelial cell attachment and proliferation assays were performed on a base PEUU formulation, on PEUU formulations loaded with hydrophobic and amphiphilic poly(methylene-[polyphenyl isocyanate]) (PAPI) based additives, and on PEUU formulations in which some of the polymer chains had been endcapped with either diisopropylaminoethyl (DIPAA) or decyl (DA) moieties. Protein adsorption experiments with PAPI-based additives showed that additive loaded PEUU formulations adsorbed significantly lower amounts of the studied proteins than did the unloaded PEUU. Protein adsorption to the DA and DIPAA endcapped PEUU films was found not to vary consistently from that of the unloaded PEUU film. Endothelial cell attachment and proliferation experiments with PAPI-DA and polyethylene glycol-PAPI-DA (PEG-PAPI-DA) loaded PEUU films showed that many of the films exhibited attachment and proliferation that was significantly enhanced compared to PEUU A' and that approached or equaled that of the tissue culture polystyrene control. Experiments with PAPI-DIPAA and PEG-PAPI-DIPAA loaded PEUU films exhibited attachment and proliferation data that was often below 10% of the tissue culture polystyrene control values. Experiments with the DA and DIPAA endcapped PEUU films showed endothelial cell attachment and proliferation that was statistically indistinguishable from the PEUU A' values. Contact angle analysis was carried out on the endcapped PEUU films, on the PAPI-based additive loaded PEUU films, and on PEUU A' using the sessile drop method. The advancing and receding contact angle behavior of the PAPI-based additive loaded PEUU films deviated markedly from the behavior of PEUU A', suggesting that the additives were present at the PEUU-water interface. The contact angle behavior of the endcapped PEUUs was similar to that of PEUU A', suggesting that the DA and DIPAA endcap moieties did not exist at the hydrated PEUU surface in appreciable quantities. To explain the differences in protein adsorption and endothelial cell behavior on the air side of additive loaded PEUUs when compared to the base PEUU, it was assumed that the additives near this region of the solvent swollen PEUU matrix may have migrated to, at, or near the PEUU-air interface during film formation, creating an additive enriched PEUU surface region.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Protein adsorption onto poly(ether urethane ureas) containing Methacrol 2138F: a surface-active amphiphilic additive.

Surface characterization and protein adsorption studies were carried out on a series of additive dispersed and additive coated poly(ether urethane ureas), PEUUs, to characterize early events in the blood compatibility of these materials. A hypothesis that is based on surface hydrophilicity, surface flexibility, and adsorption media has been developed to understand the modulated adsorption of plasma proteins by PEUU additives. Electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) and contact angle analysis were performed on two PEUU formulation as well as on PEUU formulations modified with Methacrol 2138F (co[diisopropylaminoethyl methacrylate (DIPAM)/decyl methacrylate (DM)][3/1]) or acrylate or methacrylate polymer or copolymer analogs of Methacrol 2138F. Methacrol 2138F is a commercially used amphiphilic copolymethacrylate. ESCA showed that the PEUUs loaded with Methacrol 2138F or with its hydrophilic component, homopoly (DIPAM) (h-(DIPAM)), had a higher percentage of nitrogen at their surfaces than did the base PEUUs. Contact angle analysis also showed that the air side of PEUU formulations loaded with Methacrol 2138F were more hydrophobic than was the air side of base PEUUs when films were cast from dimethylacetamide. However, during contact angle testing, the air side of PEUU films loaded with Methacrol 2138F rapidly became more hydrophilic than did the air side of the base PEUU films. A radioimmunoassay and whole or diluted human plasma were also used to characterize the presence of the proteins fibrinogen, immunoglobulin G, factor VIII/von Willebrand factor, Hageman factor (factor XII), and albumin, on the surface of the same PEUUs as analyzed by ESCA and contact angle. The protein adsorption assay showed that PEUU films loaded or coated with Methacrol 2138F, with a copolyacrylate analog of Methacrol 2138F (co(diisopropylaminoethyl acrylate [DIPAA]/decyl acrylate [DA]) [3/1]), or with the hydrophilic polyacrylate or polymethacrylate component analogs of Methacrol 2138F (h-DIPAM or h-DIPAA) adsorbed significantly lower amounts of the proteins than did either the base PEUU formulations or the homopoly(decyl methacrylate) (h-DM) or homopoly(decyl acrylate) (h-DA) coated or loaded PEUUs.

Block copolypeptides. 2. Viscoelastic properties.

The solid state structure of block copolypeptides of gamma-benzyl L-glutamate (G) and L-leucine (L) case from preferential solvents for G has been investigated by dynamic mechanical and wide angle x-ray diffraction techniques. The WAXD patterns show overlapping reflections characteristic of the individual homopolymers. Further evidence for a phase separated morphology is provided by the viscoelastic behavior. Representation of the dynamic elastic modulus in terms of the equivalent mechanical model suggests that phase separation of GLG-type polymers occurs with G as the matrix phase. In the reverse case, LGL-type polymers, it appears that some phase inversion has taken place.