Neuro-oncology family caregivers' view on keeping track of care issues using eHealth systems: it's a question of time.

Primary brain tumors (PBTs) are rare but have a great impact on both patient and family caregiver wellbeing. Supporting caregivers can help them to continue their caregiving activities to maintain the patients' best possible level of quality of life. Efforts to improve PBT caregiver wellbeing should take into account country- or culture-specific differences in care issues and supportive care needs to serve larger caregiver groups. We aimed to explore PBT caregivers' satisfaction with the current supportive care provision, as well as their thoughts on monitoring their care issues with both paper-based and digital instruments. Twelve PBT caregivers were interviewed in the United States. The semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by two coders independently. Data were combined with those collected in the Netherlands, following similar methodology (N = 15). We found that PBT caregivers utilize both formal and informal support services, but that those who experience more care issues would prefer more support, particularly in the early disease phase. Keeping track of care issues was thought to provide more insight into unmet needs and help them find professional help, but it requires investment of time and takes discipline. Caregivers preferred a brief and easy-to-use 'blended care' instrument that combines digital monitoring with personal feedback. The present study shows that the preferences of family caregivers in neuro-oncology toward keeping track of care issues are likely not heavily influenced by country- or culture-specific differences. The development of any instrument thus has the potential to benefit a large group of family caregivers.

Attitudes and preferences toward monitoring symptoms, distress, and quality of life in glioma patients and their informal caregivers.

PURPOSE: Glioma patients and their informal caregivers face many challenges in living with the disease and its disease-specific consequences. To better meet their needs, a system to monitor symptoms, distress, and quality of life could prove useful. We explored glioma patients' and caregivers' attitudes and preferences toward monitoring in general and specifically toward paper-and-pencil and computerized (eHealth) options. METHODS: In total, 15 patients and 15 informal caregivers participated in individual, semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed smooth verbatim and coded by two researchers independently. RESULTS: Advantages of monitoring generated by participants include increased awareness of problems and their flow over time, and facilitating supportive care provision. Disadvantages include investment of time and mastering the discipline to monitor frequently. Patients reported more disadvantages of monitoring, including practical and disease-specific impediments, while caregivers mentioned more advantages. Preferences for specific methods mentioned to monitor are highly personal but most prefer to have an option for face-to-face contact to discuss results of monitoring with health care professionals even in computerized instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Informal caregivers view a monitoring system more favorably than glioma patients. In developing an efficient monitoring system to help glioma patients and caregivers find their way to supportive care, a computerized instrument with the added opportunity to contact a health care professional seems to be the best option to advise.

Enhancing quality of life and mastery of informal caregivers of high-grade glioma patients: a randomized controlled trial.

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are serious primary brain tumors that may prevent the patient from functioning normally in social, emotional and cognitive respect. Often the partner's role will convert to that of informal caregiver. Consequently, they may experience significant stress and reductions in caregiver mastery, negatively affecting their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed at (1) determining factors that impact HRQOL and mastery of caregivers of HGG patients, and (2) investigate if a structured intervention consisting of psychoeducation and cognitive behavioral therapy leads to improvements in the mental component of HRQOL and mastery of caregivers. Fifty-six patient-caregiver dyads were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the care as usual group. The intervention program consisted of six one-hour sessions with a psychologist. Participants completed questionnaires concerning their perceptions of the patients' HRQOL (SF-36), neurological functioning (BN20), and cognitive functioning (MOS), and concerning their own HRQOL (SF-36) and feelings of caregiver mastery (CMS) both at baseline (i.e. before randomization) and every 2 months thereafter until 8 months later, five times in total. Patients' HRQOL and neurological functioning were found to be related to HRQOL and feelings of mastery of the informal caregiver at baseline. The intervention helped caregivers in maintaining a stable level of HRQOL and improved feelings of mastery over an 8 month period. Our findings suggest that informal caregivers can benefit from a psychological intervention as it is a helpful tool in maintaining a stable level of mental functioning and caregiver mastery.

Cognitive functioning in glioblastoma patients during radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment: initial findings.

The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive functioning in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients during treatment with radiotherapy (RT) plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Cognitive assessment took place following surgery, but prior to the start of RT (baseline), after 6 weeks of RT and concomitant TMZ (1st follow-up), and after three cycles of adjuvant TMZ (2nd follow-up). Standardized cognitive summary measures and delta scores for six cognitive domains were calculated at the individual level. Cognitive functioning of progression-free GBM patients was compared to that of matched healthy controls. Analyses were performed on a group of 13 GBM patients that were progression-free during follow-up. The results showed that the majority of patients had deficits in multiple cognitive domains at baseline. Between baseline and 1st follow-up, four patients improved in one cognitive domain, four patients deteriorated in one domain, one patient improved in one domain and deteriorated in another, and four patients remained stable in all six domains. Between 1st and 2nd follow-up, the majority of patients (11) remained stable in all six cognitive domains, whereas one patient declined in one domain, and one patient showed a deterioration in two domains. Overall, between baseline and 2nd follow-up, three patients improved in one cognitive domain, two patients deteriorated in two domains, one patient improved in one domain and deteriorated in another, and seven patients remained stable in all six cognitive domains. In conclusion, preceding treatment, the majority of GBM patients show clear-cut deficits in cognitive functioning. In the course of the first 6 months of their disease, however, progression-free GBM patients undergoing radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide treatment do not deteriorate in cognitive functioning.