Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 147: 105540, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38070761

ABSTRACT

Aminocarboxylic acid (ethylenediamine-based) chelating agents such as DTPA are widely used in a variety of products and processes. Recently, DTPA was classified in the European Union as a developmental toxicant CLP Category 1B. However, according to the CLP regulation (CLP, 2008) classification as a developmental toxicant requires a chemical to possess an intrinsic, specific property to do so. This paper provides overwhelming evidence that shows the developmental toxicity only seen at a sustained high dose of 1000 mg DTPA/kg bw/day in rats during pregnancy is mediated by zinc depletion which leads to non-specific secondary effects associated with zinc deficiency. Therefore, based on the CLP regulation itself, viz. the lack of a specific, intrinsic property, supported by significant differences in zinc kinetics and physiology between pregnant rats and pregnant women, DTPA should not be classified as a developmental toxicant. Moreover, classification for developmental toxicity resulting from zinc deficiency, and only observed at high doses, would not increase protection of human health; instead, it will only lead to onerous and disproportionate restrictions being placed on the use of this substance.


Subject(s)
Chelating Agents , Zinc , Female , Rats , Humans , Pregnancy , Animals , Chelating Agents/toxicity , Zinc/toxicity , Pentetic Acid/toxicity
2.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 97: 197-208, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29964121

ABSTRACT

Aminocarboxylic acid (ethylenediamine-based) chelating agents, such as DTPA and EDTA, are widely used in a variety of products and processes. Recently the European RAC proposed to classify DTPA as a developmental toxicant Category 1B according to CLP. This paper provides unequivocal and significant evidence that developmental effects cannot be considered an intrinsic property of the chelating substances themselves since: (1) animals fed a zinc deficient diet during gestation exhibit developmental toxicity of a similar nature and severity to that observed in studies involving such chelates, (2) sufficient supplementation of zinc in the diet, or administration of zinc bound chelates, completely negates the developmental effects. Moreover, the bioavailability of DTPA is very low with >95% of oral doses excreted unchanged via the feces within 24 h. If DTPA would possess the intrinsic property to be developmentally toxic, simple zinc supplementation should not be sufficient to negate these effects. Furthermore, the relevance of classification is highly questionable since worker or consumer exposure could not lead to a scenario whereby sufficient zinc deficiency would manifest itself. Therefore classification of DTPA for such effects is not protective of human health; instead it leads to onerous and disproportionate restrictions being placed on this substance.


Subject(s)
Chelating Agents/toxicity , Pentetic Acid/toxicity , Animals , Chelating Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Pentetic Acid/administration & dosage , Pentetic Acid/antagonists & inhibitors , Zinc/pharmacology
3.
Toxicology ; 333: 179-194, 2015 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25963507

ABSTRACT

There is a continuing interest in determining whether it is possible to identify thresholds for chemical allergy. Here allergic sensitisation of the respiratory tract by chemicals is considered in this context. This is an important occupational health problem, being associated with rhinitis and asthma, and in addition provides toxicologists and risk assessors with a number of challenges. In common with all forms of allergic disease chemical respiratory allergy develops in two phases. In the first (induction) phase exposure to a chemical allergen (by an appropriate route of exposure) causes immunological priming and sensitisation of the respiratory tract. The second (elicitation) phase is triggered if a sensitised subject is exposed subsequently to the same chemical allergen via inhalation. A secondary immune response will be provoked in the respiratory tract resulting in inflammation and the signs and symptoms of a respiratory hypersensitivity reaction. In this article attention has focused on the identification of threshold values during the acquisition of sensitisation. Current mechanistic understanding of allergy is such that it can be assumed that the development of sensitisation (and also the elicitation of an allergic reaction) is a threshold phenomenon; there will be levels of exposure below which sensitisation will not be acquired. That is, all immune responses, including allergic sensitisation, have threshold requirement for the availability of antigen/allergen, below which a response will fail to develop. The issue addressed here is whether there are methods available or clinical/epidemiological data that permit the identification of such thresholds. This document reviews briefly relevant human studies of occupational asthma, and experimental models that have been developed (or are being developed) for the identification and characterisation of chemical respiratory allergens. The main conclusion drawn is that although there is evidence that the acquisition of sensitisation to chemical respiratory allergens is a dose-related phenomenon, and that thresholds exist, it is frequently difficult to define accurate numerical values for threshold exposure levels. Nevertheless, based on occupational exposure data it may sometimes be possible to derive levels of exposure in the workplace, which are safe. An additional observation is the lack currently of suitable experimental methods for both routine hazard characterisation and the measurement of thresholds, and that such methods are still some way off. Given the current trajectory of toxicology, and the move towards the use of non-animal in vitro and/or in silico) methods, there is a need to consider the development of alternative approaches for the identification and characterisation of respiratory sensitisation hazards, and for risk assessment.


Subject(s)
Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Lung/drug effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/chemically induced , Animals , Asthma, Occupational/chemically induced , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Humans , Lung/immunology , Lung/physiopathology , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/immunology , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Toxicology/methods
4.
Clin Cancer Res ; 14(20): 6515-24, 2008 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18927291

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is an interest in the discovery of biopharmaceuticals, which are well tolerated and which potentiate the action of anthracyclines and taxanes in breast cancer therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We have produced a recombinant fusion protein, composed of the human antibody fragment scFv(F16) fused to human interleukin-2 (F16-IL2), and tested its therapeutic performance in the MDA-MB-231 xenograft model of human breast cancer. The F16 antibody is specific to the alternatively spliced A1 domain of tenascin-C, which is virtually undetectable in normal tissues but is strongly expressed in the neovasculature and stroma of breast cancer. RESULTS: When used as monotherapy, F16-IL2 displayed a strikingly superior therapeutic benefit compared with unconjugated recombinant IL-2. The administration of doxorubicin either before (8 days, 24 h, or 2 h) or simultaneously with the injection of F16-IL2 did not decrease the accumulation of immunocytokine in the tumor as measured by quantitative biodistribution analysis. Therapy experiments, featuring five once per week coadministrations of 20 mug F16-IL2 and doxorubicin, showed a statistically significant reduction of tumor growth rate and prolongation of survival at a 4 mg/kg doxorubicin dose but not at a 1 mg/kg dose. By contrast, combination of F16-IL2 with paclitaxel (5 and 1 mg/kg) exhibited a significant therapeutic benefit compared with paclitaxel alone at both dose levels. F16-IL2, alone or in combination with doxorubicin, was well tolerated in cynomolgus monkeys at doses equivalent to the ones now used in clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: F16-IL2 may represent a new useful biopharmaceutical for the treatment of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Interleukin-2/therapeutic use , Stromal Cells/metabolism , Tenascin/immunology , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/immunology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacokinetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , CHO Cells , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Drug Synergism , Female , Flow Cytometry , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Immunoglobulin Fragments/immunology , Interleukin-2/immunology , Interleukin-2/pharmacokinetics , Macaca fascicularis , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Nude , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/immunology , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism , Tenascin/administration & dosage , Tissue Distribution , Tumor Cells, Cultured
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...