ABSTRACT
In the 1960s, the American Society for Surgery of the Hand embarked on an endeavor to improve and standardize the educational experience in hand surgery. By the 1980s, numerous programs existed across the country with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education formally recognizing orthopedic surgery-based fellowships in 1985 and plastic surgery-based fellowships in 1986. In order to sit for what was then termed the Certificate of Additional Qualification examination, applicants had to demonstrate performance of a specific number of procedures while in practice. Borrowing from this theme, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education began to analyze programs according to the relative proportion of cases done by fellows at individual institutions compared to national trends. Beginning in 2019 and working collaboratively with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the Hand Fellowship Director's Association has since modified the methods by which programs are evaluated, pivoting away from comparative percentages to the establishment of case minimums. The development of this process has been iterative with the resultant outcome being an evaluation system that focuses on educational quality and technical proficiency over sheer numerical volume.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate , Fellowships and Scholarships , Hand , Orthopedics , Humans , Accreditation , Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate/history , Hand/surgery , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Orthopedics/education , Surgery, Plastic/education , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study implemented a quality improvement program based on knowledge of medico-legal risk in obstetrics and sought to evaluate the impact of this program on workplace culture. METHODS: The study conducted needs assessments with front-line providers working in the obstetrical unit of the Queensway Carleton Hospital, an urban community hospital in Ottawa, Ontario, and included the safety, communication, operational reliability, and engagement (SCORE) survey. The study investigators delivered training in quality improvement science and co-developed three projects that were based on their alignment with local needs and aggregate medico-legal risk data: an organized team response to the need for an immediate cesarean section, a protocol for managing patients who present at term with pre-labour rupture of membranes, and regular morning team briefings. Outcome measures were determined for each project from a quality improvement indicator framework, and coaching was provided to project leads. Participants completed the SCORE survey and a program effectiveness tool after the intervention. RESULTS: The majority of participants (75.2% of 153 pre-intervention and 63.1% of 157 post-intervention participants) completed the SCORE surveys. Post-intervention improvements were found in teamwork, learning environment, and safety climate, whereas levels of provider burnout remained high. Program effectiveness was highly rated, and most projects showed qualitative improvements. CONCLUSION: This study showed positive workplace culture change associated with the quality improvement intervention. Lessons learned from the implementation of this program can inform future quality improvement initiatives.
Subject(s)
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture , Organizational Culture , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Workplace , Female , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Ontario , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Program Evaluation , Quality Improvement , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few empirical studies have validated the relation between medicolegal risk and hospital patient safety performance. We sought to determine whether there was a relation between in-hospital patient safety events and medicolegal cases involving Canadian physicians. METHODS: In this ecological study, we used Poisson regression to compare data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database and the database of the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) of medicolegal cases over 10 years (2005/06 to 2014/15). We identified incidents and cases based on 15 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators within the Canadian Institute for Health Information and CMPA data sets. We performed subgroup analyses for obstetrical and surgical cases. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant positive association between volume changes in patient safety indicator events (n = 339 741) and medicolegal cases (n = 15 180) (parameter estimate 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4 to 1.9). This association suggests that, on average, a 10% decrease in events would correspond to a decrease of 11% in medicolegal cases. The degree of positive association varied by practice type, with obstetrics (97 982 patient safety indicator events, 865 cases) showing a 25% decrease in medicolegal cases for every 10% decrease in events (parameter estimate 2.9, 95% CI 0.5 to 5.3) and surgery (168 886 patient safety indicator events, 4568 cases) showing a decrease of 9% for every 10% decrease in events (parameter estimate 0.9, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.7). INTERPRETATION: The statistically significant positive association between patient safety indicator events and medicolegal cases quantifies a relation between patient safety and physician medicolegal risk in Canadian hospitals. This suggests new, practical uses for both medicolegal and patient safety indicator data in system-level quality-improvement efforts.
