ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of an airflow system in preventing entrainment of particles carrying micro-organisms from the periphery of an operating room (OR) or instrument lay-up room (ILR) is affected by many variables. It is suspected that differences in the design of the systems affect the effective protection ratio (EPR): the ratio of the size of the protected area to the surface area of the supply canopy. However, no analysis has yet been done to determine which design variables have a significant effect on this ratio. AIM: To evaluate which design variables have a significant effect on the performance of airflow systems (EPR) in ORs and ILRs. METHODS: All general and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands (N = 77) were asked to provide data from their standardized (at-rest measurement method) compulsory systems assessment reports for ORs and ILRs. Nineteen hospitals (25%) with a total of 22 hospital sites supplied information of sufficient completeness and homogeneity, resulting in measurement data for 101 ORs and 23 ILRs. This dataset was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. FINDINGS: For ORs, important predictors for the EPR were: shape of the canopy; air speed under the supply canopy; height of the canopy screen; type of system; and size of the canopy. These significant predictors (P < 0.05) explain 48% of the outcome in the dataset. For ILRs, significant predictors for the EPR were: the position of exhaust air terminals; height of the canopy screen; and size of the canopy. These significant predictors explain 66% of the outcome in the dataset. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the dataset available for analysis, it is concluded that the ratio of the size of the protected area to the surface area of the supply canopy (EPR) improves with the presence and the height of a screen around the canopy, the surface area of the supply canopy, and the air speed of the supply air under the canopy. This information can be used as guidance for the future design of unidirectional displacement airflow systems.
Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Environment, Controlled , Operating Rooms , Ventilation/instrumentation , Ventilation/methods , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Hospitals , Humans , Netherlands , Particulate Matter/analysisABSTRACT
The Strategic Implementation Plan of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA) proposed six Action Groups. After almost three years of activity, many achievements have been obtained through commitments or collaborative work of the Action Groups. However, they have often worked in silos and, consequently, synergies between Action Groups have been proposed to strengthen the triple win of the EIP on AHA. The paper presents the methodology and current status of the Task Force on EIP on AHA synergies. Synergies are in line with the Action Groups' new Renovated Action Plan (2016-2018) to ensure that their future objectives are coherent and fully connected. The outcomes and impact of synergies are using the Monitoring and Assessment Framework for the EIP on AHA (MAFEIP). Eight proposals for synergies have been approved by the Task Force: Five cross-cutting synergies which can be used for all current and future synergies as they consider overarching domains (appropriate polypharmacy, citizen empowerment, teaching and coaching on AHA, deployment of synergies to EU regions, Responsible Research and Innovation), and three cross-cutting synergies focussing on current Action Group activities (falls, frailty, integrated care and chronic respiratory diseases).