Clinical significance of measuring hepatic venous pressure gradient on transjugular liver biopsy for patients with pre-cirrhotic bridging fibrosis liver disease.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that patients with pre-cirrhotic bridging fibrosis (Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Viral Hepatitis, METAVIR stage F3) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient ≥10 mmHg) experience a higher rate of clinical decompensation than patients without CSPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 128 consecutive patients with pathology proven bridging fibrosis without cirrhosis between 2012 and 2019 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients with HVPG measurement obtained during the same outpatient transjugular liver biopsy and clinical follow up of at least two years. Primary endpoint included rate of overall complication related to portal hypertension including evidence of either ascites, presence of varices on imaging or endoscopy, or evidence of hepatic encephalopathy. RESULTS: Among 128 patients with bridging fibrosis (67 females and 61 males; average age 56 years), 42 (33%) and 86 (67%) were with and without CSPH (HVPG ≥10 mmHg). Median follow-up time was 4 years. Rate of overall complication (either ascites, varices or hepatic encephalopathy) in patients with and without CSPH was 36/42 (86%) and 39/86 (45%) (p < .001) respectively. Rate of developing ascites, varices and hepatic encephalopathy in patients with and without CSPH was 21/42 (50%) vs 26/86 (30%) (p = .034), 32/42 (76%) vs 26/86 (30%) (p ≤ .001) and 18/42 (43%) vs 12/86 (14%) (p = .001) respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with pre-cirrhotic bridging fibrosis and CSPH were associated with higher rates of developing ascites, varices and hepatic encephalopathy. Measuring HVPG during transjugular liver biopsy provides additional prognostic value in anticipating clinical decompensation in patients with pre-cirrhotic bridging fibrosis.

Thirty-day Readmission Rates for Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting.

BACKGROUND: Because of the emergence of readmission-related Medicare penalties, efforts are being made to identify and reduce patient readmissions. The purpose of this study was to compare rates and risk factors for 30-d readmission and hospital length of stay (LOS) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) among patients treated for carotid artery stenosis in Pennsylvania. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4). We identified 15,966 patients who underwent CEA (n = 13,557) or CAS (n = 2409) in Pennsylvania between 2011 and 2014. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for 30-d readmission, whereas linear regression was used to model factors influencing LOS. Propensity score analysis was used to control for imbalanced covariates between procedures. RESULTS: Thirty-day readmission rates in Pennsylvania after CEA and CAS for carotid artery stenosis were similar (9.8% and 9.6%, respectively; P = 0.794). Not home discharge destination, Charlson comorbidity index ≥2, and LOS >1 d were all significantly associated with readmission risk. Procedure type (CEA or CAS) did not significantly influence risk. A significant difference in LOS was found between CEA and CAS, but the magnitude of the difference was small (2.38 for CAS versus 2.59 for CEA; P = 0.007). Black race, urgent and emergent cases, and not home discharges significantly increased LOS by notable amounts (1, 1.5, 3.9, and 1.9 d, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stenosis patients in Pennsylvania undergoing CEA or CAS had similar 30-d readmission rates. Although LOS was significantly different, the magnitude of the difference was not large.