Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 8(4): 325-330, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37852320

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report the effective use of neoadjuvant darovasertib and crizotinib in a patient with a large uveal melanoma (UM) in his only functional eye. DESIGN: Case report. SUBJECTS: One patient with T4b UM. INTERVENTION: Neoadjuvant darovasertib and crizotinib, followed by plaque brachytherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective tumor response and conversion from planned enucleation to placement of fovea- and optic nerve-sparing plaque brachytherapy. RESULTS: A patient with a history of left eye blindness from retinal artery occlusion presented with rapidly declining right eye vision due to a primary UM measuring 18 mm in maximal diameter and 16.5 mm in maximal thickness. To salvage vision, neoadjuvant treatment was initiated using darovasertib and crizotinib. After 6 months of neoadjuvant treatment, which included intraocular lens replacement for tumor-associated cataract, the tumor regressed to 14.1 mm in maximal diameter and 2.6 mm in maximal thickness, enabling treatment with plaque brachytherapy rather than enucleation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of darovasertib and crizotinib for UM is an effective neoadjuvant strategy that warrants further investigation as an approach to improve visual outcomes from the treatment of primary UM. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The other authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Uveal Neoplasms , Humans , Crizotinib/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Uveal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uveal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(8)2022 Aug 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35948362

ABSTRACT

A woman with metastatic melanoma was treated with immunotherapy induction with ipilimumab and nivolumab and radiotherapy to liver metastases. The patient deteriorated shortly thereafter, becoming febrile and hypotensive and requiring admission to the intensie care unit (ICU) for inotrope support. Failure to respond to antibiotics and a negative septic screen prompted further investigation, which ultimately led to a diagnosis of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). The patient improved on high dose steroids and was discharged home. Months later, in the context of progressive melanoma, the patient was re-challenged with nivolumab monotherapy and subsequently experienced recurrence of HLH, confirming the aetiology as being immunotherapy related. This case serves as a reminder to consider HLH where there are fevers of unknown origin in an unwell patient receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and also highlights immunotherapy as a potential cause for HLH, which has rarely been reported in the literature to date.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic , Melanoma , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/chemically induced , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/drug therapy , Nivolumab/adverse effects
3.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 22(3): e425-e430, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32778511

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of radiotherapy (RT) on the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with the anti-programmed death 1 antibodies nivolumab or pembrolizumab between January 2016 and May 2019 at 3 tertiary centers, who were also treated with palliative RT either during or within 3 months of starting anti-programmed death 1 treatment. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment history were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and correlated with RT use. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients were identified, with a median follow-up of 19.4 months. The median age was 70 years (range, 35-90 years), and they were 63% male, 60% smokers, and 65% had adenocarcinoma histology. At the commencement of ICI treatment, the majority (86%) had ≥ 1 line of prior therapy and 34% had brain metastases. A total of 102 (38%) patients received RT within 3 months of starting ICI or subsequently during ICI treatment. Of patients that received RT, 86 (84%) received conventional hypofractionated RT, and, in the majority, 81 (79%) the intent of RT was symptom control. The use of RT did not increase grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events. The overall median PFS was 2.0 months (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.6 months) and the median OS was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval, 6.4-9.5 months). There were no significant differences in median PFS (3.0 vs. 2.0 months; P = .515) and median OS (9.0 vs. 9.0 months; P = .917) in the patients who received RT versus those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with metastatic NSCLC, the addition of RT to ICI was not associated with increased toxicity or improved survival.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
4.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 28(3): e13018, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30761632

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Sepsis is a significant complication following cancer surgery. Although standardised care bundles improve sepsis outcomes in other populations, the benefits in cancer patients are unclear. The objectives of this study were to describe the epidemiology of sepsis in cancer patients post-surgery, and to evaluate the impact of a clinical sepsis pathway on management and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A standardised hospital-wide sepsis pathway was developed in 2013, and all cases of sepsis at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Inclusion criteria were sepsis onset during the 100-day period following a surgical procedure for cancer diagnosis. Patients were identified using ICD-10-AM sepsis discharge codes, audit documentation and the hospital's antimicrobial approval system. Sepsis episodes were classified as managed on- or off-pathway. RESULTS: A total of 119 sepsis episodes were identified. Of these, 71 (59.7%) were managed on the sepsis pathway. Episodes managed on-pathway resulted more frequently in administration of appropriate antibiotics compared to those off-pathway (94.4% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001), and had shorter time to first-dose antibiotics (median 85 vs. 315 min, p < 0.001). Pathway utilisation was associated with significant reductions in need for inotropes (7% vs. 13%, p = 0.023), ventilation (3% vs. 10%, p = 0.006) and length of hospitalisation (median 15 vs. 30 days, p = 0.008). The most frequent source of infection was organ-space surgical site infection (24.4% of instances). CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated hospital-wide sepsis pathway had significant impact on the quality of care and clinical outcomes of sepsis in cancer surgery patients. Cost-benefit analysis of sepsis pathways for cancer patients is required.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Sepsis/therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cancer Care Facilities , Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Bundles , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/diagnosis , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data
5.
BMJ Open Qual ; 7(3): e000355, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30019016

ABSTRACT

Infection and sepsis are common problems in cancer management affecting up to 45% of patients and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare utilisation. OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a whole of hospital clinical pathway for the management of sepsis (SP) in a specialised cancer hospital and to measure the impact on patient outcomes and healthcare utilisation. METHODS: A multidisciplinary sepsis working party was established. Process mapping of practices for recognition and management of sepsis was undertaken across all clinical areas. A clinical pathway document that supported nurse-initiated sepsis care, prompt antibiotic and fluid resuscitation was implemented. Process and outcome measures for patients with sepsis were collected preimplementation (April-December 2012), postimplementation cohorts (April-December 2013), and from January to December 2014. RESULTS: 323 patients were evaluated (111 preimplementation, 212 postimplementation). More patients with sepsis had lactate measured (75.0% vs 17.2%) and appropriate first dose antibiotic (90.1% vs 76.1%) (all p<0.05). Time to antibiotics was halved (55 vs 110 min, p<0.05). Patients with sepsis had lower rates of intensive care unit admission (17.1% vs 35.5%), postsepsis length of stay (7.5 vs 9.9 days), and sepsis-related mortality (5.0% vs 16.2%) (all p<0.05). Mean total hospital admission costs were lower in the SP cohort, with a significant difference in admission costs between historical and SP non-surgical groups of $A8363 (95% CI 81.02 to 16645.32, p=0.048) per patient on the pathway. A second cohort of 449 patients with sepsis from January to December 2014 demonstrated sustained improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The SP was associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes and reduced costs. The SP has been sustained since 2013, and has been successfully implemented in another hospital with further implementations underway in Victoria.

6.
Biologics ; 7: 47-60, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23459471

ABSTRACT

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are an emerging class of therapeutics with potential as anticancer drugs. The rationale for developing HDAC inhibitors (and other chromatin-modifying agents) as anticancer therapies arose from the understanding that in addition to genetic mutations, epigenetic changes such as dysregulation of HDAC enzymes can alter phenotype and gene expression, disturb homeostasis, and contribute to neoplastic growth. The family of HDAC inhibitors is large and diverse. It includes a range of naturally occurring and synthetic compounds that differ in terms of structure, function, and specificity. HDAC inhibitors have multiple cell type-specific effects in vitro and in vivo, such as growth arrest, cell differentiation, and apoptosis in malignant cells. HDAC inhibitors have the potential to be used as monotherapies or in combination with other anticancer therapies. Currently, there are two HDAC inhibitors that have received approval from the US FDA for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, Zolinza) and depsipeptide (romidepsin, Istodax). More recently, depsipeptide has also gained FDA approval for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Many more clinical trials assessing the effects of various HDAC inhibitors on hematological and solid malignancies are currently being conducted. Despite the proven anticancer effects of particular HDAC inhibitors against certain cancers, many aspects of HDAC enzymes and HDAC inhibitors are still not fully understood. Increasing our understanding of the effects of HDAC inhibitors, their targets and mechanisms of action will be critical for the advancement of these drugs, especially to facilitate the rational design of HDAC inhibitors that are effective as antineoplastic agents. This review will discuss the use of HDAC inhibitors as multitargeted therapies for malignancy. Further, we outline the pharmacology and mechanisms of action of HDAC inhibitors while discussing the safety and efficacy of these compounds in clinical studies to date.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...