Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Surg ; 204(6): 958-62; discussion 962, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23022252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enteral feeding tube placement has been performed by nurses, gastroenterologists using endoscopy, and interventional radiologists. We hypothesized that midlevel providers placed feeding tubes at bedside using fluoroscopy safely, rapidly, and cost-effectively. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed bedside feeding tube placement under fluoroscopy by trained nurse practitioners. We compared charges for this method with charges for placement by other practitioners. RESULTS: Nurse practitioners placed 632 feeding tubes in 462 patients. Three hundred seventy-nine placements took place in mechanically ventilated placements. Ninety-seven percent of tubes were positioned past the pylorus. The mean fluoroscopy time was 0.7 ± 1.2 minutes. The mean procedure time was 7.0 ± 5.1 minutes. All tubes were placed within 24 hours of the request. There were no complications. Institutional charges for tube placement were $149 for nurse practitioners, $226 for gastroenterologists, and $328 for interventional radiologists. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of feeding tubes under fluoroscopy by nurse practitioners is safe, timely, and cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/nursing , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/nursing , Nurse Practitioners , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Enteral Nutrition/economics , Enteral Nutrition/instrumentation , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Female , Fluoroscopy/economics , Fluoroscopy/nursing , Hospital Charges , Humans , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/economics , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/instrumentation , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/methods , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Time Factors , Utah
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...