Practical applications of brief screening questionnaires for autism spectrum disorder in a psychiatry outpatient setting.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine the diagnostic performance of the social and communication disorders checklist (SCDC) and strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to detect autism spectrum conditions (ASC), along with the social responsiveness scale-second edition (SRS-2) as reference, in a psychiatry outpatient setting. METHODS: We translated the SCDC into Japanese since its Japanese version was unavailable. We examined its test-retest reliability as well as the internal consistency reliability and diagnostic performance of the three questionnaires among 41 Japanese psychiatric outpatients, using the best-estimate diagnosis of ASC based on the diagnostic interview for social and communication disorders, as a gold standard. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability was high for the SCDC. Although the internal consistency reliability was high for the SCDC and SRS-2, that was low for the prosocial and peer problem subscales of the SDQ. The performance of the SCDC, SDQ, and SRS-2 to detect ASC was moderate: the area under the ROC curve of 0.78, 0.78, and 0.84, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although questionnaires to detect ASC, including the three examined, generally have only moderate performance in this setting, these can be successfully applied to high-risk populations such as psychiatry outpatients, when multi-level rather than dichotomous likelihood ratios are used.

The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) for DSM-5: A validation for neurodevelopmental disorders in Japanese outpatients.

OBJECTIVE: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) is a widely used semi-structured diagnostic interview in child and adolescent psychiatry. However, given the extensive use of the K-SADS-PL in clinical practice and research and its adaptation for use in many languages and cultures, validation studies of the instrument are scarce. This study was designed to examine the inter-rater reliability, criterion validity and construct validity of the updated instrument, the K-SADS-PL for DSM-5, in Japanese outpatients totaling 95 children and adolescents. METHOD: We translated and adapted the updated instrument into Japanese using a standard forward-backward translation procedure. Two of nine experienced clinicians independently made diagnoses using the interview for each patient in a conjoint session. Discrepancies in diagnosis between two clinicians were resolved by consensus, and the consensus diagnosis was compared with a "best-estimate" diagnosis made by five experienced clinicians using all available data sources for patients who were blinded to the diagnosis using the K-SADS-PL for DSM-5. The "best-estimate" diagnosis of ASD was also based on the Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability was very good, as shown by κ ≥ 0.8 for all disorders examined: autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, tic disorders, selective mutism, enuresis and encopresis. The criterion validity was good, as shown by κ ≥ 0.6 for all disorders examined, except for ASD (κ = 0.59). This study also revealed good construct validity of the instrument by confirming the expected associations with each scale from the Social Responsiveness Scale-2nd edition and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the K-SADS-PL for DSM-5 generates valid diagnoses in child and adolescent psychiatry.