Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Front Immunol ; 13: 887783, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35603142

ABSTRACT

Objective: We evaluated changes of HTLV-1 proviral loads (PVLs) during treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and investigated whether these changes affect the clinical course in HTLV-1-positive RA patients. Methods: A total of 41 HTLV-1-positive RA patients were analyzed. Their clinical picture including disease activity [Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), DAS28-CRP, simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and clinical disease activity index (CDAI)] and comorbidity were evaluated over a 2-year period. PVLs from peripheral blood mononuclear cells were investigated by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We investigated whether HTLV-1 PVLs is altered, or which clinical characteristics affect changes of HTLV1-PVLs during 2-year treatment. Results: Clinical disease activity was not changed during the 2-year observational period. The mean HTLV-1 PVL value change from baseline to 2 years was -1.2 copies/1000 PBMCs, which was not statistically significant. No baseline clinical characteristics influenced changes in HTLV-1 PVL. However, a numerical change of HTLV-1 PVLs was increased in 4 patients initiating the new biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) at 2-10 months after starting the new b/ts DMARDs (numerical increase was 24.87 copies/1000 PBMCs). Infection occurred in 4 patients, and 3 of those patients showed an increased HTLV-1 PVL. Univariate analysis revealed an association between increase of HTLV-1 PVL and incidence of infection. Conclusions: Over 2 years, HTLV-1 PVL did not significantly change in our HTLV-1-positive RA patients. Individual changes in HTLV-1 PVL were correlated with incidence of infection but not disease activity which indicate that we may take precaution toward infection at the uptick of HTLV-1 PVL in HTLV-1-positive RA patients.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , HTLV-I Infections , Human T-lymphotropic virus 1 , Leukemia, T-Cell , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , HTLV-I Infections/complications , Humans , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Proviruses , Viral Load
2.
Mod Rheumatol ; 30(3): 471-480, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30938551

ABSTRACT

Objective: Recently, Human T-cell leukemia virus type-1 proviral load (HTLV-1 PVL) has been evaluated as an important predictor of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) in HTLV-1 carriers. We aimed to evaluate whether HTLV-1 PVL is also important for the development of ATL among HTLV-1-positive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods: We established a cohort of 82 HTLV-1-positive RA patients between 2017 and 2018. Of those, 27 (32.9%) were treated with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) with/without methotrexate. We measured HTLV-1 PVL in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at study entry and compared the value by clinical status and treatment options.Results: The median PVL for all was 9.6 copies per 1000 PBMCs without sex difference (male 17.2 and female 8.6; p = .24). The median PVL was significantly higher for patient's comorbid bronchiectasis, malignancies, and opportunistic infectious diseases, compared with patients without comorbidity. There were no significant differences in PVL levels among types of bDMARDs, although the level was tended to be higher for patients treated with JAK inhibitor.Conclusions: HTLV-1 seropositive RA patients comorbid for any diseases having higher HTLV-1 PVLs will be a higher risk for developing ATL. Careful follow-up of these patients is necessary to detect ATL development.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , HTLV-I Infections/virology , Human T-lymphotropic virus 1/pathogenicity , Proviruses/pathogenicity , Viral Load , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/virology , Female , HTLV-I Infections/complications , HTLV-I Infections/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 58(7): 1274-1284, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30793749

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare retention of tocilizumab (TCZ) as monotherapy vs combination therapy with MTX in RA patients achieving clinical improvements during the first year. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cohort study using a real-life registry containing RA patients who had begun TCZ with or without MTX between April 2008 and November 2016. Among patients with ≥50% improvement of clinical disease activity index (CDAI) during the first year (CDAI50 responders), we evaluated whether MTX use may have affected TCZ discontinuation during the second and subsequent years (maintenance therapy). RESULTS: Among 510 patients with high or moderate CDAI, 328 (64.3%) were CDAI50 responders. The rate of MTX use was 53.0% among responders and 54.4% among non-responders. During maintenance therapy (mean follow-up 30.7 months), 43.9% of CDAI50 responders discontinued TCZ. The most common cause was efficacy loss followed by adverse events. Kaplan-Meier estimates for TCZ retention were 48.3 months (95% CI 42.0, 54.5) for monotherapy and 50.0 months (95% CI 45.9, 54.0) for combination therapy. According to Gray's test, there was no significant impact of MTX use on cumulative incidence of efficacy loss or adverse events. In the Fine-Gray competing risk regression model, CDAI >10 at the start of maintenance therapy and age were predictive factors for TCZ discontinuation due to efficacy loss (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% CI 1.41, 4.72) and adverse events (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.01, 1.08), respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in TCZ retention between monotherapy and combination therapy with MTX.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Male , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Registries , Remission Induction/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Withholding Treatment/statistics & numerical data
4.
Clin Rheumatol ; 36(12): 2673-2682, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28884373

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to determine the prevalence of renal dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to identify factors associated with this complication. Between October 2014 and May 2015, we consecutively recruited RA patients at rheumatology sections of community hospitals in Japan. Each patient's absolute and body surface area (BSA)-indexed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were measured twice over a 3-month interval. Renal dysfunction was defined as absolute eGFR or BSA-indexed eGFR < 60. Albuminuria and hematuria were also recorded. Associations between renal dysfunction and possible risk factors were examined by multivariate logistic regression analyses. A total of 1908 outpatients with RA were included in this study. The prevalence of renal dysfunction based on absolute eGFR and BSA-indexed eGFR was 33.8 and 18.6%, respectively. Albuminuria was observed in 8.1% of this patient cohort, and the prevalence of hematuria was 7.5%. Advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 7.24, p < 0.001), female sex (OR 3.12, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR 2.22, p < 0.001), and obesity (OR 0.59, p < 0.001) were independently associated with the risk of absolute eGFR-based renal dysfunction. Advanced age (OR 5.19, p < 0.001) and hypertension (OR 3.05, p < 0.001) also had associations with BSA-indexed eGFR-based renal dysfunction. RA duration, stages, severity, and cumulative steroid dose were considered significant risk factors in univariate analyses, but their associations were less potent after adjustment for other covariates. Renal dysfunction is relatively common in RA patients and is mainly associated with advanced age and hypertension but not with RA-related factors.


Subject(s)
Albuminuria/epidemiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Kidney Diseases/epidemiology , Kidney/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Albuminuria/etiology , Albuminuria/physiopathology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/etiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Kidney Diseases/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors
5.
PLoS One ; 12(6): e0179179, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28594905

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Knowing the risk of hospitalized infection associated with individual biological agents is an important factor in selecting the best treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study examined the comparative risk of hospitalized infection between biological agents in a routine care setting. METHODS: We used data for all RA patients who had first begun biological therapy at rheumatology divisions of participating community hospitals in Japan between January 2009 and December 2014. New treatment episodes with etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, abatacept, or tocilizumab were included. Patients were allowed to contribute multiple treatment episodes with different biological agents. Incidence rates (IRs) of hospitalized infection during the first year of follow-up were examined. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for overall hospitalized infection and for pulmonary hospitalized infection, adjusting for possible confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1596 new treatment episodes were identified. The incidence of overall hospitalized infection during the first year was 86 with 1239 person-years (PYs), yielding a crude IR of 6.9 per 100 PYs (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-8.6). After correction for confounders, no significant difference in risk of hospitalized infection was observed between treatment groups: adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1.54 (0.78-3.04) for infliximab, 1.72 (0.88-3.34) for adalimumab, 1.11 (0.55-2.21) for abatacept, and 1.02 (0.55-1.87) for tocilizumab compared with etanercept. Patient-specific factors such as age, RA functional class, body mass index (BMI), prednisolone use, and chronic lung disease contributed more to the risk of hospitalized infection than specific biological agents. The incidence of pulmonary hospitalized infection was 50 and a crude IR of 4.0 per 100 PYs (95% CI, 3.1-5.3). After adjustment for confounders, adalimumab had a significantly higher HR for pulmonary hospitalized infection compared with tocilizumab: an adjusted HR (95% CI) was 4.43 (1.72-11.37) for adalimumab. BMI, prednisolone use, diabetes mellitus, and chronic lung disease were also significant factors associated with the risk of pulmonary hospitalized infection. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the risk of overall hospitalized infection was not determined by the type of biological agents, and patient-specific risk factors had more impact on the risk of hospitalized infection. For pulmonary hospitalized infections, the use of adalimumab was significantly associated with a greater risk of this complication than tocilizumab use.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/mortality , Demography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
7.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 72(8): 1362-6, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23345600

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the impact of tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanised monoclonal anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, on antibody response following administration of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23). METHODS: A total of 190 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) received PPV23. Patients were classified into TCZ (n=50), TCZ + methotrexate (MTX) (n=54), MTX (n=62) and RA control (n=24) groups. We measured serotype-specific IgG concentrations of pneumococcal serotypes 6B and 23F using ELISA and functional antibody activity using a multiplexed opsonophagocytic killing assay, reported as the opsonisation indices (OIs), before and 4-6 weeks after vaccination. Positive antibody response was defined as a 2-fold or more increase in the IgG concentration or as a ≥10-fold or more increase in the OI. RESULTS: IgG concentrations and OIs were significantly increased in all treatment groups in response to vaccination. The TCZ group antibody response rates were comparable with those of the RA control group for each serotype. MTX had a negative impact on vaccine efficacy. Multivariate logistic analysis confirmed that TCZ is not associated with an inadequate antibody response to either serotype. No severe adverse effect was observed in any treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ does not impair PPV23 immunogenicity in RA patients, whereas antibody responses may be reduced when TCZ is used as a combination therapy with MTX.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibody Formation/drug effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Opsonin Proteins/immunology , Phagocytosis/immunology , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Polysaccharides, Bacterial/blood , Polysaccharides, Bacterial/immunology , Serotyping , Streptococcus pneumoniae/immunology
8.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 71(12): 2006-10, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22887851

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the influence of tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanised monoclonal anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, on antibody response following influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A total of 194 RA patients received inactive trivalent influenza vaccination (A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B/B1 strains). All patients were classified into the TCZ (n=62), TCZ+methotrexate (MTX) (n=49), MTX (n=65) and RA control (n=18) groups. Antibody titres were measured before and 4-6 weeks after vaccination using the haemagglutination inhibitory assay. RESULTS: For the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains, the TCZ and TCZ+MTX groups achieved fold increases of 9.9-14.5, postvaccination seroprotection rates greater than 70% and seroresponse rates greater than 40%. For the B/B1 strain, seroresponse rates were approximately 30%, but fold increases and seroprotection rates were 5.0-5.4 and greater than 70%, respectively, in these treatment groups. MTX had a negative impact on vaccination efficacy, but adequate responses for protection were nevertheless demonstrated in the MTX group. Neither severe adverse effects nor RA flares were observed. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ does not hamper antibody response to influenza vaccine in RA patients. Influenza vaccination is considered effective in protecting RA patients receiving TCZ therapy with or without MTX.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Humans , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/standards , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...