Higher amount of free circulating DNA in serum than in plasma is not mainly caused by contaminated extraneous DNA during separation.

Circulating DNA isolated from serum and plasma has been shown to be a useful biomarker in various diseases including cancer. Serum reportedly contains a higher amount of free circulating DNA than it does in plasma. The underlying reason for this is unclear, but important because it may have clinical implications in interpreting results and using the appropriate resource. Twenty-four pairs of serum and plasma samples were collected from patients with tumors, and free circulating DNA was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for the ALU repeats, which had a sensitivity of 0.1 pg/microL of DNA in serum/plasma. The possibility of DNA loss was eliminated because ALU-qPCR does not require DNA purification from serum/plasma. The DNA concentrations of serum and plasma samples were 970 +/- 730 pg/microL and 180 +/- 150 pg/microL (mean +/- SD), respectively. The amount of DNA in paired serum and plasma specimens was positively correlated (R = 0.72 and P = 0.0002). An estimated 8.2% of total DNA in serum was extraneous; the concentration of DNA was 6.1 +/- 3.5 (mean +/- SD)-fold higher in serum than in paired plasma after subtraction of it. Contribution of extraneous DNA from cells in blood ruptured during the separation step was minor for explaining the difference between serum and plasma. A possible explanation was unequal distribution of DNA during separation from whole blood. We advocate that serum is a better specimen source for circulating cancer-related DNA as a biomarker.

Prediction of breast tumor progression by integrity of free circulating DNA in serum.

PURPOSE: Cell-free DNA circulating in serum is a candidate molecular biomarker for malignant tumors. Unlike uniformly truncated DNA released from apoptotic cells, DNA released from dead cancer cells varies in size. Serum DNA integrity, the ratio of longer fragments to total DNA, may be clinically useful for detecting breast cancer progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples from 51 healthy females and 83 females with primary breast cancers (eight American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0, 24 stage I, 27 stage II, 21 stage III, and three stage IV) were assessed preoperatively. Serum DNA integrity was assessed by fragment length-dependent quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction of ALU DNA repeats. RESULTS: Mean serum DNA integrity was significantly higher in patients with stage II, III, and IV breast cancers than in healthy females (P = .005, P < .0001, and P = .002, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for discriminating patients with stage II or more advanced breast cancers from healthy females had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.86). Mean serum DNA integrity was positively correlated to size of invasive cancers (r = 0.48; P < .0001) and significantly higher in the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI; 0.25 +/- 0.02 v 0.17 +/- 0.02; P < .0001) or lymph node (LN) metastasis (0.27 +/- 0.02 v 0.14 +/- 0.02; P < .0001). The ROC curve for discriminating LN metastasis had an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.89). Serum DNA integrity and LVI were significant for predicting LN metastasis in a multivariate analysis (P = .0002 and P < .0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Integrity of serum circulating DNA is a promising molecular biomarker for detecting breast cancer tumor progression and regional LN metastases.

Methylation of p16 and Ras association domain family protein 1a during colorectal malignant transformation.

Accurate assessment of gene methylation in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archived tissue (FF-PEAT) by microdissection remains challenging because the tissue volume is small and DNA is damaged. In addition, methods for methylation assessment, such as methylation-specific PCR (MSP), require sodium bisulfite modification (SBM) on purified DNA, which causes major loss of DNA. On-slide SBM, in which DNA is modified in situ before isolation of tumor cells, eliminates DNA purification steps and allows histology-oriented assessment of gene methylation. This study describes a protocol and use of on-slide SBM using 20 FF-PEAT of colorectal cancers with intratumoral adenoma components to detect accumulation of gene methylation during colorectal malignant transformation. Deparaffinized tissue sections were incubated in sodium bisulfite solution for 8 hours at 60 degrees C, stained with hematoxylin, and then microdissected. Proteinase K lysate was directly used as a template in subsequent PCR. Using on-slide SBM, 282-bp-long bisulfite direct sequencing was possible. Yield of modified DNA was 2.6-fold greater than standard SBM on average. The mean conversion rate was 97%, and false-positive or false-negative results were not observed in subsequent MSP. Intratumoral heterogeneity by accumulation of p16 and Ras association domain family protein 1a methylation during malignant transformation were shown by MSP comparing cancer with adenoma parts within a single section. On-slide SBM is applicable in most methylation studies using FF-PEAT. It allows detailed, intratumoral analysis of methylation heterogeneity within solid tumors. On-slide SBM will significantly improve our approach and understanding of epigenetic events in minimal disease and the carcinogenic process.

Increased integrity of free circulating DNA in sera of patients with colorectal or periampullary cancer: direct quantitative PCR for ALU repeats.

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA circulating in blood is a candidate biomarker for malignant tumors. Unlike uniformly truncated DNA released from apoptotic nondiseased cells, DNA released from dead cancer cells varies in size. We developed a novel method to measure the ratio of longer to shorter DNA fragments (DNA integrity) in serum as a potential biomarker for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or periampullary cancers (PACs). METHODS: Sera from 32 patients with CRC (3 stage I, 14 stage II, 6 stage III, and 9 stage IV patients), 19 patients with PACs (2 stage I, 9 stage II, 1 stage III, and 7 stage IV patients), and 51 healthy volunteers were assessed by quantitative real-time PCR of ALU repeats (ALU-qPCR) with 2 sets of primers (115 and 247 bp) amplifying different lengths of DNA. We used serum directly as a template for ALU-qPCR without DNA purification. DNA integrity was determined as ratio of qPCR results of 247-bp ALU over 115-bp ALU. RESULTS: ALU-qPCR had a detection limit of 0.01 pg of DNA. Eliminating DNA purification reduced technical artifacts and reagent/labor costs. Serum DNA integrity was significantly increased for stage I/II and III/IV CRC and stage I/II and III/IV PACs (P = 0.002, P = 0.006, P = 0.022, and P <0.0001, respectively). ROC curves for detecting CRC and PACs had areas under the curves of 0.78 and 0.80, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Direct ALU-qPCR is a robust, highly sensitive, and high-throughput method to measure serum DNA integrity. DNA integrity is a potential serum biomarker for detection and evaluation of CRC and PACs.

Enhancement of immunity by a DNA melanoma vaccine against TRP2 with CCL21 as an adjuvant.

Tyrosinase-related protein-2 (TRP2) is a weak antigen expressed in murine and human melanomas. Induction of antibody (Ab) response and T-cell immunity toward TRP2 with DNA plasmid vaccines has not been efficient to date. Recent studies have suggested that a chemokine ligand for the CCR7 (CCL21) present on T-cells and dendritic cells is important in activating and regulating immunity. We investigated the effectiveness of CCL21 as an adjuvant with an HVJ anionic liposomal TRP2 DNA (plasmid) vaccine to enhance anti-TRP2 Ab, cytokines, delayed-type hypersensitivity, T-cell responses, and tumor protection against B16 melanoma cells. Induction of anti-TRP2 immunity depended mainly on cell-mediated immunity, which was regulated by timing and route of CCL21 administration with DNA vaccine. The optimum protocol was to administer CCL21 im 24 h before DNA vaccine at the same vaccination site. Two vaccinations (prime/boost) were essential for induction of strong anti-TRP2 cell-mediated immunity. CCL21 administration 3 days before or 24 h after DNA vaccine, simultaneous with DNA vaccine, or at different sites (iv, opposite leg) was not effective. This study demonstrated that CCL21 was an effective adjuvant to enhance TRP2-specific immunity induced by a plasmid DNA cancer vaccine.