Significant decreases in blood propofol concentrations during adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytoma.

AIM: The kinetics of propofol are influenced by cardiac output. The aim of this study was to examine changes in blood propofol concentrations during phaeochromocytoma surgery using target-controlled infusion (TCI) anaesthesia with propofol. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study. Ten patients with phaeochromocytoma who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy were included. Cardiac output was measured using an arterial pressure-based cardiac output analysis method. The target blood propofol concentrations were adjusted to maintain an approximate bispectral index (BIS) value of 40 before initiating surgery. The settings remained constant during surgery. Blood samples for propofol concentrations were collected from the radial artery at seven time points: two before tumour manipulation (T1, 2), two during tumour manipulation (T3, 4), and three after tumour vein ligation (T4-7). BIS values, the arterial pressure cardiac index (APCI) and haemodynamic parameters were measured at the same time points as the blood samples. The prop-ratio was calculated by dividing blood propofol concentrations by target concentrations of TCI. RESULTS: APCI increased during tumour manipulation and after tumour vein ligation. The prop-ratio was reduced significantly by approximately 40% and showed a significant negative correlation with APCI. BIS values increased significantly and showed a significant negative correlation with the prop-ratio. CONCLUSION: The increased APCI during tumour manipulation and after tumour vein ligation was associated with markedly reduced blood propofol concentrations. These results reveal that significant decreases in the anaesthetic effect may be observed in patients undergoing phaeochromocytoma surgery even if TCI anaesthesia is used with propofol.

Influence of atropine on the dose requirements of propofol in humans.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of atropine on the dose requirement of propofol for induction of anesthesia and propofol concentrations during continuous infusion. METHODS: Study 1: Forty patients were randomly allocated to the control or atropine groups. Induction of anesthesia commenced 3 min following the administration of 0.9% saline or atropine (0.01 mg kg(-1)), using a Diprifuser set to achieve propofol concentration of 6.0 microg mL(-1). The primary end point was the propofol dose per kg at the moment of loss of response to a command. Study 2: Fifteen patients undergoing elective surgery were enrolled. Propofol was administered to all subjects via target-controlled infusion to achieve a propofol concentration at 2.0 microg mL(-1) after intubation. Before and after administration of atropine (0.01 mg kg(-1)), cardiac output (CO) was measured using indocyanine green as an indicator and blood propofol concentration was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Study 1: The propofol dose for each group was 2.22+/-0.21 mg kg(-1) for control group and 2.45+/-0.28 mg kg(-1) for atropine, respectively (p=0.014). Study 2: After the administration of atropine, CO was significantly increased from 4.28+/-0.83 to 5.76+/-1.55 l min(-1) (p<0.0001). Propofol concentration was significantly decreased from 2.12+/-0.28 to 1.69+/-0.27 microg mL(-1) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Following the administration of atropine, the propofol requirements for the induction of anesthesia were increased and propofol concentrations were decreased during continuous infusion by the administration of atropine.

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation on propofol concentrations during general anesthesia in humans.

The present study investigated the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on propofol concentrations in humans. Eleven patients undergoing elective surgery were enrolled in this study. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, then maintained using 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen, fentanyl 10-20 microg/kg and continuous infusion of propofol. Vecuronium was used to facilitate the artificial ventilation of the lungs. Propofol was administered to all subjects via target-controlled infusion to achieve a propofol concentration of 6.0 microg/mL at intubation and 2.0 microg/mL after intubation. Before, during and after PEEP level of 10 cmH(2)O, cardiac output (CO) and effective liver blood flow (LBF) was measured using indocyanine green as an indicator and blood propofol concentration was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Data are expressed as median and range. After PEEP of 10 cmH(2)O was applied, CO and effective LBF was significantly decreased from 5.5 (3.8-6.8) L/min to 4.5 (3.2-5.8) L/min (P < 0.05), 0.78 (0.65-1.21) L/min to 0.65 (0.50-0.89) L/min (P < 0.05), respectively. Propofol concentration was significantly increased from 2.21 (1.46-2.63) microg/mL to 2.45(1.79-2.89) microg/mL (P < 0.05). These data indicate that propofol concentrations can be increased by PEEP, suggesting the possibility of overdosing following PEEP.

Prediction of total propofol clearance based on enzyme activities in microsomes from human kidney and liver.

OBJECTIVE: Propofol is commonly used for anesthesia and sedation in intensive care units. Approximately 53% of injected propofol is excreted in the urine as the glucuronide and 38% as hydroxylated metabolites. Liver, kidneys and intestine are suspected as clearance tissues. We investigated the contribution of the liver and kidneys to propofol metabolism in humans using an in vitro-in vivo scale up approach. METHODS: Renal tissue was obtained from five patients who received nephrectomies. Each renal hydroxylation and glucuronidation enzymatic activities in microsomal fractions from patients were performed discretely and their estimation based on the decrease of propofol concentration. Hepatic hydroxylation and glucuronidation activities were also performed separately using human liver microsomes. This estimation is based on the decrease of propofol concentration, assuming that the contribution of hydroxylation activity without NADPH-generating system and glucuronidation activity without UDPGA in each microsomal fraction are negligible. Both renal and hepatic clearances were estimated assuming a well-stirred model. RESULTS: Enzymatic activity of propofol oxidation in renal microsomes was negligible. Although glucuronidation activity in microsomes from kidneys was comparable to that from liver, the hepatic intrinsic clearance predicted from in vitro study was higher than that in kidneys due to the larger tissue volume and higher protein concentration. However, glucuronidation clearance in kidney is relatively similar to that in liver because of blood flow limitation of clearance in both tissues. CONCLUSION: The high degree of hydroxylation activity in liver microsomes is consistent with the blood flow-limited hepatic clearance of propofol. Although the activity of propofol glucuronidation in liver is higher, glucuronidation in kidney may be a substantial contributor.

Disposition and pharmacodynamics of propofol during isovolaemic haemorrhage followed by crystalloid resuscitation in humans.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to estimate the changes in unbound propofol concentration and pharmacodynamics of propofol during isovolaemic haemorrhage followed by crystalloid resuscitation. METHODS: Ten patients undergoing measure elective surgery were enrolled in this study. Anaesthesia was maintained by 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen, fentanyl 10-20 microg kg-1 and an infusion of propofol at 8 mg kg-1 h-1 until the end of the operation. Radial arterial samples were collected for measurement of propofol concentration just before the start of the operation, and at the point when blood loss was >10 ml kg-1, 20 ml kg-1 and 30 ml kg-1. Cardiac output (CO), haemoglobin values and plasma concentrations of albumin were also determined. Patients were resuscitated with lactated Ringer's solution to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure (+/-20% of prehaemorrhage). Bispectral index (BIS) was measured continuously. RESULTS: Mean blood pressure, heart rate and CO were well maintained during the operation in all patients. Haemoglobin values and plasma albumin concentrations decreased significantly during surgery. There were no significant differences in total propofol concentrations across the time points. The unbound propofol concentration was increased from 0.10+/-0.040 microg ml-1 to 0.17+/-0.041 microg ml-1 after the haemorrhage of 30 ml kg-1 (P<0.05). BIS was significantly decreased from 47+/-5.9 to 39+/-3.7 (P<0.05) after the haemorrhage of 30 ml kg-1. CONCLUSIONS: The hypnotic potency of propofol is increased during isovolaemic haemorrhage in crystalloid resuscitated patients even if CO is maintained.

The effect of gynecologic laparoscopy on propofol concentrations administered by the target-controlled infusion system.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of gynecologic laparoscopy on propofol concentrations administered by the target-controlled infusion (TCI) system. Thirteen patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy (intraabdominal pressure of 10 mmHg) were enrolled in this study. Anesthesia was induced with vecuronium 0.1 mg.kg(-1) and propofol, then maintained by 60% nitrous oxide and sevoflurane in oxygen and a constant infusion of propofol. Propofol was administered to all subjects by means of a target-controlled infusion to achieve propofol plasma concentration at 6.0 microg.ml(-1) at intubation and 2.0 microg.ml(-1) after intubation. Before and during laparoscopy, plasma propofol concentration was determined using high-performance liquid chromatograhy. Cardiac output (CO) and effective liver blood flow (LBF) were also measured using indocyanine green as an indicator. Before and during pneumoperitoneum, there were no significant differences in propofol concentrations between each point. Propofol concentrations were well achieved to predicted concentrations administered by the TCI system during gynecologic laparoscopy under propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia.

Influence of landiolol on the dose requirement of propofol for induction of anesthesia.

It was reported that the pharmacokinetics of propofol was influenced by cardiac output (CO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of landiolol (short-acting beta-1-adrenergic blocker) on the dose requirement of propofol for induction of anesthesia. Forty patients were randomly allocated to the control and landiolol group. Induction of anesthesia commenced 10 min after the infusion of 0.9% saline or landiolol, using a Diprifusor set to achieve propofol plasma concentration of 6.0 microg/mL. Induction of anesthesia was defined as the first lack of response to command. Propofol dose was 2.22+/- 0.21 mg/kg for the control group and 1.79+/- 0.28 mg/kg for the landiolol group (P<0.0001). The quantity of propofol required for the induction of anesthesia was reduced by the administration of landiolol.

Kidneys contribute to the extrahepatic clearance of propofol in humans, but not lungs and brain.

AIMS: The principal site for the metabolism of propofol is the liver. However, the total body clearance of propofol is greater than the generally accepted hepatic blood flow. In this study, we determined the elimination of propofol in the liver, lungs, brain and kidneys by measuring the arterial-venous blood concentration at steady state in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: After induction of anaesthesia, propofol was infused continuously during surgery. For measurement of propofol concentration, blood samples were collected from the radial and pulmonary artery at predetermined intervals. In addition, blood samples from hepatic and internal jugular vein were collected at the same times in 19 patients in whom a hepatic venous catheter was fitted and the other six in whom an internal jugular venous catheter was fitted, respectively. In six out of 19 patients fitted with a hepatic venous catheter, blood samples from the radial artery and the renal vein were also collected at the same time, when the catheter was inserted into the right renal vein before insertion into the hepatic vein. RESULTS: Hepatic clearance of propofol was approximately 60% of total body clearance. The hepatic extraction ratio of propofol was 0.87 +/- 0.09. There was no significant difference in the concentration of propofol between the radial, pulmonary arteries and internal jugular vein. However, a high level of propofol extraction in the kidneys was observed--the renal extraction ratio being 0.70 +/- 0.13. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated substantial renal extraction of propofol in human. Metabolic clearance of propofol by the kidneys accounts for almost one-third of total body clearance and may be the major contributor to the extrahepatic elimination of this drug.

A dopamine infusion decreases propofol concentration during epidural blockade under general anesthesia.

PURPOSE: It is common clinical practice to use dopamine to manage the reduction in blood pressure accompanying epidural blockade. As propofol is a high-clearance drug, propofol concentrations can be influenced by cardiac output (CO). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of dopamine infusions on propofol concentrations administered by a target-controlled infusion system during epidural block under general anesthesia. METHODS: 12 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were enrolled in this study. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and vecuronium 0.1 mg.kg(-1), and maintained using 67% nitrous oxide, sevoflurane in oxygen and constant infusion of propofol. Propofol was administered to all subjects via target-controlled infusion to achieve a propofol concentration at 6.0 microg.mL(-1) at intubation and 2.0 microg.mL(-1) after intubation. Before and after the administration of 10 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine from the epidural catheter and dopamine infusion at 5 microg.kg(-1).min(-1), CO and effective liver blood flow (LBF) were measured using indocyanine green. Blood propofol concentration was also determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: At one hour after epidural block and dopamine infusion, CO was significantly increased from 4.30 +/- 1.07 L.min(-1) to 5.82 +/- 0.98 L.min(-1) (P < 0.0001), and effective LBF was increased 0.75 +/- 0.17 L.min(-1) to 0.96 +/- 0.18 L.min(-1) (P < 0.0001). Propofol concentration was significantly decreased from 2.13 +/- 0.24 microg.mL(-1) to 1.59 +/- 0.29 microg.mL(-1) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol concentrations decrease with an increase in CO, suggesting the possibility of inadequate anesthetic depth following catecholamine infusion during propofol anesthesia.

Human kidneys play an important role in the elimination of propofol.

BACKGROUND: Extrahepatic clearance of propofol has been suggested because its total body clearance exceeds hepatic blood flow. However, it remains uncertain which organs are involved in the extrahepatic clearance of propofol. In vitro studies suggest that the kidneys contribute to the clearance of this drug. The purpose of this study was to confirm whether human kidneys participate in propofol disposition in vivo. METHODS: Ten patients scheduled to undergo nephrectomy were enrolled in this study. Renal blood flow was measured using para-aminohippurate. Anesthesia was induced with vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) and propofol (2 mg/kg) and then maintained with nitrous oxide (60%), sevoflurane (1 approximately 2%) in oxygen, and an infusion of propofol (2 mg . kg . h). Radial arterial blood for propofol and para-aminohippurate analysis was collected from a cannula inserted in the radial artery. The renal venous sample and the radial arterial sample were obtained at the same time after the steady state of propofol was established. RESULTS: The renal extraction ratio of propofol was 0.58 +/- 0.15 (mean +/- SD). The renal clearance of propofol was 0.41 +/- 0.15 l/min (mean +/- SD), or 27 +/- 9.9% (mean +/- SD) of total body clearance. CONCLUSION: Human kidneys play an important role in the elimination of propofol.

Plasma concentration for optimal sedation and total body clearance of propofol in patients after esophagectomy.

The present study investigated plasma propofol concentration for optimal sedation and total body clearance in patients who required sedation for mechanical ventilation after esophagectomy. Seven patients after esophagectomy were enrolled in this study. Plasma propofol concentrations were measured with high performance liquid chromatography. Total body clearance was calculated from the steady-state concentration. The infusion rate of propofol for achieving the sedation score of level 3 (drowsy, responds to verbal stimulation) was 1.74 +/- 0.82 mg kg(-1) h(-1) (mean +/- SD, n = 7) when the plasma propofol concentration and the total body clearance were 0.85 +/- 0.24 microg ml(-1) and 1.83 +/- 0.54 l min(-1) (mean +/- SD, n =7), respectively.

[Postoperative laryngeal edema presumably due to hypoalbuminemia causing acute airway obstruction after extubation in a patient after nephrectomy].

We report here a case of upper airway obstruction occurring after extubation in a 55-yr-old 60 kg man after elective nephrectomy. Anesthesia was maintained with O2 (33%), N2O, sevoflurane (1.5-2%), and propofol infusion (2 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1)). Blood loss was 1,965 ml, part of which was substituted by blood transfusion and albumin infusion. After surgery, the patient recovered uneventfully and could be extubated shortly. Twenty minutes after extubation, he developed dyspnea progressively with stridor and became cyanotic despite the use of oxygen mask and assisted ventilation. Oxygen saturation decreased gradually, and bradycardia (<30 beats x min(-1)) and severe hypotension were also observed. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation using epinephrine was immediately started. Re-intubation of the trachea was difficult due to severe edema, but eventually performed using a tube of a smaller size (internal diameter 7.0 mm). Subsequent investigations using a fiberscope confirmed extensive soft tissue swelling, maximal at the level of the vocal cord and extending up- and down-wards to the trachea, indicating that the obstruction is caused by severe laryngeal edema. We believe that edema may have been caused by hypoalbuminemia (1.3 g x dl(-1)) at the end of operation. Therefore, it should be noted that hypoalbuminemia may cause laryngeal edema leading to acute airway obstruction.

Changes in drug plasma concentrations of an extensively bound and highly extracted drug, propofol, in response to altered plasma binding.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary bypass is known to result in a reduction in the plasma binding of drugs. The resulting effect on the hepatic clearance of drugs with low extraction is well understood. However, the situation with those that are highly extracted is less clear. Studies were, therefore, undertaken with one such drug, propofol, for which plasma binding was changed during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: After induction of anesthesia with midazolam in 19 patients, propofol was infused continuously at a rate of 4 mg. kg(-1). h(-1) during surgery. Propofol's concentration was measured by HPLC in blood samples collected from the radial artery and hepatic vein during surgery at predetermined intervals. The drug's unbound fraction in arterial plasma was estimated via equilibrium dialysis. RESULTS: The total concentration of propofol in blood was unchanged during surgery except shortly after the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. By contrast, the fraction of unbound propofol in blood increased by 2-fold during cardiopulmonary bypass and then decreased after the completion of cardiopulmonary bypass. The hepatic extraction ratio of propofol was greater than 0.8 and remained constant throughout surgery. The ratio of propofol concentration in erythrocytes to that in blood increased by 1.6-fold during cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSIONS: During cardiopulmonary bypass, a significant increase in the concentration of unbound propofol occurred without alteration in the total propofol concentration in blood. The effect of the changes of propofol's protein binding on its kinetics was consistent with the predictions based on the well-stirred model of hepatic elimination for an intravenously infused high-clearance drug. Our finding on propofol pharmacokinetics may be the first example demonstrating the theoretic prediction of the well-stirred model.

Benefits of the laryngeal mask for airway management during electroconvulsive therapy.

Accumulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) can disturb systemic hemodynamics and increase the seizure threshold in patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the laryngeal mask on blood gas, hemodynamics, and seizure duration during ECT under propofol anesthesia. Ventilation was assisted using either a face mask (n=23) or laryngeal mask (n=23) and 100% oxygen. There was no significant difference in PaO2 between the two groups. PaCO2 was greater in the face mask group than the laryngeal mask group at 3 minutes (54 +/- 11 mm Hg, 41 +/- 8 mm Hg, respectively) and 5 minutes (52 +/- 11 mm Hg, 43 +/- 15 mm Hg, respectively) after electrical stimulation (p<0.01). Mean blood pressure was higher than the corresponding preanesthesia value at 1 to 5 minutes after electrical stimulation in the face mask group and at 1 to 3 minutes after electrical stimulation in the laryngeal mask group. Mean seizure duration in the face mask group was significantly shorter than that in the laryngeal mask group (33 +/- 11 seconds, 42 +/- 10 seconds, respectively p<0.01). The change in PaCO2 was minor in the laryngeal mask group compared with the face mask group and seizure duration was longer in the laryngeal mask group. Laryngeal mask may be suitable for airway management during ECT anesthesia, especially when fitting a face mask is difficult.