ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 2022, the WHO announced that the 6-month BPaL/M regimen should be used for drug-resistant TB (DR-TB). We estimate the patient and provider costs of BPaL compared to current standard-of-care treatment in the Philippines. METHODS: Patients on BPaL under operational research, or 9-11-month standard short oral regimen (SSOR) and 18-21-month standard long oral regimen (SLOR) under programmatic conditions were interviewed using the WHO cross-sectional TB patient cost tool. Provider costs were assessed through a bottom-up and top-down costing analysis. RESULTS: Total patient costs per treatment episode were lowest with BPaL (USD518.0) and increased with use of SSOR (USD825.8) and SLOR (USD1,023.0). Total provider costs per successful treatment were lowest with BPaL (USD1,994.5) and increased with SSOR (USD3,121.5) and SLOR (USD10,032.4). Compared to SSOR, BPaL treatment was cost-effective at even the lowest willingness to pay threshold. As expected, SLOR was the costliest and least effective regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Costs incurred by patients on BPaL were 37% (95% CI 22-56) less than SSOR and 50% (95% CI 32-68) less than SLOR, while providers could save 36% (95% CI 21-56) to 80% (95% CI 64-93) per successful treatment, respectively. The study shows that treatment of DR-TB with BPaL was cost-saving for patients and cost-effective for the health system.
CONTEXTE: En 2022, l'OMS a annoncé que le traitement BPaL/M de 6 mois devrait être utilisé pour la TB pharmacorésistante (DR-TB). Nous estimons les coûts du BPaL pour les patients et les prestataires par rapport au traitement standard actuel aux Philippines. MÉTHODES: Des patients sous BPaL dans le cadre d'une recherche opérationnelle, ou un régime oral court standard de 9 à 11 mois (SSOR, pour l'anglais « standard short oral regimen ¼) et un régime oral long standard de 18 à 21 mois (SLOR, pour l'anglais « standard long oral regimen ¼) dans des conditions programmatiques ont été interrogés à l'aide de l'outil transversal de l'OMS sur le coût pour les patients atteints de TB. Les coûts des fournisseurs ont été évalués par une analyse ascendante et descendante des coûts. RÉSULTATS: Les coûts totaux pour les patients par épisode de traitement étaient les plus bas avec BPaL (518,0 USD) et augmentaient avec l'utilisation de SSOR (825,8 USD) et SLOR (1 023,0 USD). Les coûts totaux des prestataires par traitement réussi étaient les plus bas avec BPaL (1 994,5 USD) et ont augmenté avec SSOR (3 121,5 USD) et SLOR (10 032,4 USD). Comparé à SSOR, le traitement BPaL était rentable même au seuil de volonté de payer le plus bas. Comme prévu, le SLOR était le régime le plus coûteux et le moins efficace. CONCLUSIONS: Les coûts encourus par les patients sous BPaL étaient inférieurs de 37% (IC à 95% 2256) à ceux du SSOR et de 50% (IC à 95% 3268) à ceux du SLOR, tandis que les prestataires pouvaient économiser respectivement 36 % (IC à 95% 2156) à 80% (IC à 95% 6493) par traitement réussi. L'étude montre que le traitement de la DR-TB par BPaL a permis de réaliser des économies pour les patients et pour le système de santé.
ABSTRACT
TB affects around 10.6 million people each year and there are now around 155 million TB survivors. TB and its treatments can lead to permanently impaired health and wellbeing. In 2019, representatives of TB affected communities attending the '1st International Post-Tuberculosis Symposium´ called for the development of clinical guidance on these issues. This clinical statement on post-TB health and wellbeing responds to this call and builds on the work of the symposium, which brought together TB survivors, healthcare professionals and researchers. Our document offers expert opinion and, where possible, evidence-based guidance to aid clinicians in the diagnosis and management of post-TB conditions and research in this field. It covers all aspects of post-TB, including economic, social and psychological wellbeing, post TB lung disease (PTLD), cardiovascular and pericardial disease, neurological disability, effects in adolescents and children, and future research needs.
Subject(s)
Tuberculosis , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/therapy , Health PersonnelABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the costs and catastrophic costs incurred by drug-susceptible (DS) pulmonary TB patients in The Gambia.METHODS: This observational study collected cost and socio-economic data using a micro-costing approach from the household perspective from 244 adult DS-TB patients with pulmonary TB receiving treatment through the national treatment programme in The Gambia. We used data collected between 2017 and 2020 using an adapted version of the WHO generic patient cost survey instrument to estimate costs and the proportion of patients experiencing catastrophic costs (≥20% of household income).RESULTS: The mean total cost of the TB episode was $104.11 (2018 USD). Direct costs were highest before treatment ($22.93). Indirect costs accounted for over 50% of the entire episode costs. Using different income estimation approaches and catastrophic cost thresholds, 0.4-75% of participants encountered catastrophic costs, showing the variability of results given the different assumptions we utilised.CONCLUSIONS: We show that despite the benefits of free TB care and treatment, DS-TB patients still incur substantial direct and indirect costs, and cases of impoverishing expenditure varied vastly depending on the income estimation approaches used.
