Impact of Gemcitabine Plus S1 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Borderline Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the only curative strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: In an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with GS, repeated every 21 days, was administered for three cycles to patients with histologic or cytologically confirmed borderline resectable (BR) PHC who were eligible for inclusion in the study. In this study, BR PHC was defined as positive for lymph node metastasis and for cancerous vascular invasion or Bismuth type 4 on preoperative imaging. The primary end point consisted of the 3- and 5-year survival rates. The secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, and pathologic effect. RESULTS: The study enrolled 60 patients between January 2011 and December 2016. With respect to toxicity, the major adverse effect was neutropenia, which reached grade 3 or 4 in 53.3% of cases. The overall disease control rate was 91.3%. The median survival time for the entire cohort was 30.3 months. For all the patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 44.1%, and the 5-year survival rate was 30.0%. Resection with curative intent was performed for 43 (71%) of the 60 patients. For 81% of the resected patients, R0 resection was performed, and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications or a higher morbidity rate was seen in 41% of the patients. The median survival time was 50.1 months for the resected and 14.8 months for the unresected patients. For the resected patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 55.8%, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 36.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine/S-1 combination NAC has promising efficacy and good tolerability for patients with BR PHC.

Efficacy of prolonged elemental diet therapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A pilot prospective randomized trial (UMIN000004108).

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: This randomized clinical trial examined efficacy of prolonged elemental diet (ED) therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which often causes postoperative malnutrition leading to worsened short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with PDAC receiving PD was randomly assigned to prolonged ED group (PEDG) and control group (CG). Fat-free ED (Elental®, EA Pharma CO., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) via tube jejunostomy was initiated on postoperative day 1 and increased to maintain with 600 kcal/day in addition to oral intake. ED was discontinued if sufficient oral intake was achieved in CG but continued during 3 postoperative months in PEDG. Primary outcome was complication necessitating readmission. Secondary outcomes were nutritional parameters, relative dose intensity (RDI) in cases of adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty patients were assigned to CG and 19 to PEDG. Cumulative post-discharge readmission rate was significantly lower in PEDG than in CG (PEDG vs CG; 12.6% vs 43.7% at 12-post-discharge-month; p = 0.018). Total calorie and ED-derived protein intakes were significantly larger in PEDG than in CG up to 3-postoperative-month but thereafter similar among groups. Lymphocyte counts were significantly increased and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) was significantly reduced in PEDG than in CG at 2-, 3-, and 6-postoperative-month. However, other outcome measures did not differ among groups. CONCLUSION: This trial failed to show survival benefit of prolonged ED therapy but demonstrated its favorable effect on increased lymphocyte counts, reduced NLR, and prevention of complications necessitating readmission, those which may lead to survival benefit with some modifications.

A Simple and Easily Reproducible Model of Reversible Obstructive Jaundice in Rats.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic carcinoma are major malignancies that cause obstructive jaundice (OJ). This study aimed to develop a simple and easily reproducible rat model of reversible OJ (ROJ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: OJ was induced by clamping the common bile duct (CBD) using a U-shaped titanium hemoclip and its base was attached by ligation using 2-cm long 4-0 polypropylene suture. An anti-adhesive sheet was placed around the CBD. OJ was mitigated by pulling the suture to remove the clip under laparotomy 3 days later. Serum chemistry and liver histopathology were compared between the ROJ group and sham surgery (SH) groups. RESULTS: Three days after inducing OJ, serum total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase were remarkably elevated in the ROJ group and thereafter reduced significantly after mitigating OJ. Similar findings were confirmed by histopathology. CONCLUSION: Our rat model of reversible OJ was considered simple and easily reproducible.

Our Rationale of Initiating Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Proposal of Criteria for "Borderline Resectable" in the Field of Surgery for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The concept of "borderline resectable" was recently introduced to the field of surgery for pancreatic cancer, and surgical outcomes for this disease with extremely dismal prognosis have improved since the introduction of this concept. However, no such concept has yet been introduced to the field of surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCca). AIM: To determine a definition and criteria for "borderline resectable" in the field of surgery for HCca. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 88 patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCca at our institution between May 1992 and December 2008 to clarify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: Survival outcomes were obtained for these 88 patients, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 31.8%. Independent factors predictive of cancer death were determined by multivariate analysis to be the presence of regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) and pathological confirmed vascular invasion (VI). Cumulative survival rates of 23 patients with both LNM and VI who underwent surgery were significantly worse than those of the remaining 65 surgically treated patients and similar to those of 26 patients who were considered to have unresectable disease and treated with non-surgical multidisciplinary treatment during the same study period. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of surgery for cases of HCca showing regional LNM and VI were no better than those of non-surgical treatment for unresectable disease. Coexistence of these two factors indicates oncologically dismal condition and thus such cases should be considered "borderline resectable." Treatments additional to surgery are required for "borderline resectable" cases to obtain better outcomes.

Single-institution experience with gemcitabine-cisplatin combination therapy as a second-line treatment for patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer after failure of gemcitabine-S-1 combination therapy: a prospective feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: NCCN and Japanese clinical guidelines for the treatment of biliary tract cancer (BTC) addressed gemcitabine-cisplatin combination (GC) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced BTC ineligible for surgery in 2013. However, gemcitabine-S1 combination therapy (GS) has been widely used as first-line treatment in Japan because Japanese social insurance coverage of S-1 for BTC was approved prior to that of cisplatin. AIM: To elucidate the efficacy and tolerability of GC as second-line chemotherapy for patients with unresectable BTC after failure of GS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2008 and August 2011, patients with unresectable BTC who provided informed consent and received GC comprising gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 and cisplatin at 20 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8 in a 3-week cycle after failure of GS were included in the present study. Clinical data from these patients were collected prospectively. Primary endpoints were overall survival and time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were response and tolerability. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were analyzed. Median survival time (MST) and TTP from the beginning of second-line treatment were 6.5 and 3.3 months, respectively, whereas MST from the commencement of first-line therapy was 12.06 months. One patient showed partial response, 16 had stable disease and 10 experienced disease progression. As a result, disease control rate was 63.0%. In total, 119 courses (median, 4; range, 1-15) were administered. Discontinuation of GC due to drug toxicities was not observed. CONCLUSION: Although some issues remain to be clarified, mainly due to the small sample size, this single-institution experience with GC as second-line treatment after failure of GS showed acceptable outcomes and good tolerability.