Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 47(3): 291.e1-291.e8, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34366180

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common injuries with a rising incidence. A substantial portion of the cost of care is attributable to therapy services. Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-directed hand therapy program guided by digital media compared with that of traditional therapy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in patients aged 18 years or older who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a DRF with volar plating. Subjects were randomized to traditional hand therapy using a 12-week protocol or an identical protocol presented in digital videos and performed at home. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were collected as the primary outcome at 2 weeks (baseline), 6 weeks, and 12 weeks or greater. Pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) scores, wrist and forearm range of motion, wrist circumference, and grip strength were recorded as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled. Forty-nine patients were included in the analysis-21 in the digital media group and 28 in the traditional group. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in QuickDASH scores between baseline and 12-week or greater time points. The QuickDASH scores in the digital media group were slightly more improved than those in the traditional group at the 6-week and 12-week or greater time points; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Pain VAS and VR-12 scores were comparable between group differences at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: Our digital media program was at least as effective as traditional therapy for patients undergoing volar plating of DRF. These results may help inform the design of future trials investigating the effectiveness of digital media-based hand therapy programs. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.


Subject(s)
Radius Fractures , Adolescent , Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Hand Strength , Humans , Internet , Radius Fractures/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Surg Educ ; 78(4): 1269-1274, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33281076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical fixation of hip fractures is a common procedure at teaching hospitals with resident support and in community hospitals. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated to what extent participation by residents in hip fracture fixation affects operative times or outcomes. SETTING: Operations were performed by three surgeons who operate at a teaching hospital with resident support, and at a community hospital without residents in the same metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of operative time and early post-operative outcomes on a series of 314 patients with hip fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association A1-3, B1-3) treated with surgical fixation between April 2012 and March 2015; 177 patients at the community hospital, and 137 at the teaching hospital. METHODS: Multivariate regression assessed the effect of hospital type, adjusting for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist classification, and Charlson comorbidity index. RESULTS: We found lower median operative time at the community hospital than the teaching hospital (46 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [43, 52] versus 75 minutes, 95% CI = [70, 81]) and lower estimated blood loss (177.3 mL, 95% CI=[158.6, 195.1] versus 234.8 mL, 95% CI = [196.4, 273.6]), but no differences in transfusion requirement, length of stay, or discharge to skilled nursing facility. Adjusted odds ratio for thirty-day mortality at the teaching hospital was 5.44 (95% CI = [1.22, 24.1]). CONCLUSION: We found longer operative times and elevated estimated blood loss with resident involvement in surgical fixation of hip fractures. There was a difference in 30-day mortality between the groups, although this cannot simply be attributed to resident involvement as there are many other factors related to mortality.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Orthopedics , Fracture Fixation , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies
3.
Hand (N Y) ; 12(6): 591-596, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28719974

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to determine the accuracy of hand injections with and without the aid of ultrasound (U/S) into the carpal tunnel, thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, first dorsal compartment (DC) and the radiocarpal (RC) joint. METHODS: Four participants of various level of experience injected the carpal tunnel, thumb CMC, first DC, and RC joint into 40 fresh frozen cadaver specimens with blue dye and radiographic contrast. Participants 1 and 2 were injected without U/S guidance, and participants 3 and 4 were injected with U/S guidance. A successful injection was determined by both fluoroscopy and dissection/direct observation. Additional information was recorded for each injection such as median nerve infiltration and evidence of thumb CMC arthrosis. RESULTS: The overall accuracy for carpal tunnel, thumb CMC, first DC, and RC injections were 95%, 63%, 90%, and 90%, respectively. Success was compared with and without U/S guidance. Success rates were similar for each injection site, except the thumb CMC joint, where U/S participants had 25% higher accuracy. In the setting of thumb CMC arthrosis, the incidence of success was 38% for participants with no U/S aid and 72% for participants with U/S aid. There was a significant difference between participants who used U/S with the participant with more U/S experience being more successful. CONCLUSION: Carpal tunnel, first DC, and RC injections had an accuracy of greater than 90%. Thumb CMC injections have a lower accuracy (63%) and one can improve accuracy with U/S. The accuracy of U/S-guided injections is dependent on the user and their experience.


Subject(s)
Carpometacarpal Joints/diagnostic imaging , Injections, Intra-Articular/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Wrist Joint/diagnostic imaging , Cadaver , Clinical Competence , Coloring Agents , Contrast Media , Humans
4.
Eur Spine J ; 26(6): 1645-1651, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27679430

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Controversy persists as to whether to end multilevel thoracolumbar fusions caudally at L5 or S1. Some argue that stopping at L5 may preserve greater function, but there are few data comparing functional limitations due to lumbar stiffness in patients with fusion to L5 versus S1. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients undergoing multilevel thoracolumbar fusions with an L5 caudal endpoint have a better lumbosacral function than patients with an S1 caudal endpoint. METHODS: Patients undergoing successful thoracolumbar fusion of 5 or more levels to L5 or S1, with solid fusion at 2 year follow-up, were examined from a single European center in addition to a multi-center North American database of 237 patients. In total, 40 patients with a distal stopping point of L5 were matched with a subset of 40 patients with a distal endpoint of S1 ± pelvic fixation. The L5 and S1 groups were matched for the final Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA C7-S1), number of fusion levels, and age. Impacts of lumbar stiffness on function as measured by the Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) were compared using the conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: After matching, there was no significant difference between the S1 and L5 groups for the final ODI (29.22 ± 21.6 for S1 versus 29.21 ± 21.7 for L5; p = 0.98), SVA (29.5 ± 40.3 mm for S1 versus 33.7 ± 37.1 mm for L5; p = 0.97), mean age (61.6 ± 11.0 years for S1 versus 58.3 ± 12.6 years for L5; p = 0.23), and number of fusion levels (9.7 ± 3.3 levels for S1 versus 9.0 ± 3 levels for L5; p = 0.34). The final 2-year postoperative LSDI scores were not significantly different between the S1 group (28.08 ± 21.47) and L5 group (29.21 ± 21.66) (hazard ratio 0.99, 95 % CI 0.97-1.03, p = 0.81). CONCLUSION: The analysis of patients with multilevel thoracolumbar fusions demonstrated that after minimum 2 year follow-up, self-reported functional impacts of lumbar stiffness were not significantly different between the patients with distal endpoints of L5 versus S1. The choice of distal fusion level of L5 does not appear to retain sufficient spinal flexibility to substantially affect postoperative function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Sacrum/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Adult , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Patient Outcome Assessment
5.
J Orthop Trauma ; 30(4): 213-6, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26606599

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between injury severity surrogates and other patient factors with the development and severity of heterotopic ossification (HO) following open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fractures treated with a posterior approach. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Academic level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-one patients who were treated through a posterior approach with a minimum of 6-month radiographic follow-up were identified from an acetabular fracture database. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence and severity (Brooker Grade III/IV) of HO 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: Length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU), non-ICU LOS >10 days, and HO prophylaxis with external radiation beam therapy (XRT) were significantly associated with the development of HO in a multivariate model [ICU LOS: 1-2 days, odds ratio (OR) = 4.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-18.25; 3-6 days, OR = 4.1, 95% CI, 1.27-13.27; >6 days, OR = 11.7, 95% CI, 3.24-42.22; non-ICU LOS >10 days (vs. 0-6 days): OR = 7.6, 95% CI, 2.6-22.25; XRT HO prophylaxis: OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.10-0.85]. Other variables evaluated in multivariate modeling not significantly associated with development and severity of HO included age, gender, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, presence of neurologic injury, Letournel fracture type, occurrence of hip dislocation, interval from injury to surgery, operative time, and estimated blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Surrogates of injury severity, including days in the ICU and non-ICU hospital LOS >10 days, were associated with the development of HO in our cohort of acetabular fracture patients. Prophylaxis with XRT was significantly protective against the development of HO, and the ability to provide prophylaxis is very likely related to the severity of injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Acetabulum/injuries , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Ossification, Heterotopic/diagnosis , Ossification, Heterotopic/epidemiology , Trauma Severity Indices , Acetabulum/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Causality , Comorbidity , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/statistics & numerical data , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Ohio/epidemiology , Open Fracture Reduction/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 39(24): E1468-74, 2014 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25202930

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To understand whether patients actually perceive increased limitations as compared with their preoperative state due to stiffness after lumbar arthrodesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar arthrodesis by intention eliminates spinal motion in an attempt to decrease pain, deformity, and instability. Independent of pain, loss of mobility can impact ability to perform certain activities of daily living. The lumbar stiffness disability index (LSDI) is a validated measure of the effect of lumbar stiffness on functional activities. To date, no prospective evaluations of stiffness impacts on patient function after lumbar arthrodesis have been reported. METHODS: The LSDI, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Oswestry Disability Index were administered preoperatively and at 2-year minimum follow-up to 62 adult patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative disease or spinal deformity. Patients also completed a satisfaction questionnaire at 2 years. Patients were separated according to the number of lumbar arthrodesis levels. Pre- and postoperative LSDI, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical composite score, and Oswestry Disability Index scores were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS: Significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index were observed across all arthrodesis levels, and significant improvements in physical composite score were observed at level 1 and at 5 or more levels. Patients undergoing 1-level arthrodesis demonstrated statistically significant decreases in LSDI scores, indicating less impact from stiffness than at baseline. Patients with 3 or 4 levels and 5 or more levels of arthrodesis showed increases in LSDI scores, although none reached significance with the numbers available. Forty-six percent of patients reported that low back stiffness created significant limitations in activities of daily living, although 97% indicated that they would undergo the same procedure again and 91% reported that any increase in stiffness was an acceptable trade-off for their functional improvements from lumbar arthrodesis. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing elective lumbar arthrodesis reported relatively limited functional deficit due to stiffness at 2-year follow-up. Paradoxically, patients undergoing 1-level arthrodesis actually reported significantly less limitation due to stiffness postoperatively. Although the effects of stiffness did trend toward greater impacts among patients undergoing longer fusions, 91% of patients were satisfied with trade-offs of function and pain relief in exchange for perceived increases in lumbar stiffness.


Subject(s)
Internal Fixators/adverse effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Movement/physiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Spinal Curvatures/surgery , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 38(17): 1508-15, 2013 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23324934

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of postoperative post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms on clinical outcomes after lumbar arthrodesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative PTSD symptoms occur among many patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion. Although adverse impact of preoperative depression and psychiatric distress has been described, no reports have assessed the impact of postoperative PTSD symptoms on clinical outcomes after lumbar arthrodesis. METHODS: Seventy-three patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal arthrodesis completed the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Short-Form 36 and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were completed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Impact of postoperative PTSD symptoms, preoperative psychiatric diagnoses, and mental composite scores on clinical outcome scores and likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference for ODI and physical composite score (PCS) was evaluated. RESULTS: PTSD symptoms were reported in 22% of the cohort, with significantly reduced surgical benefit as measured by final (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.003) and total change (P = 0.013 and P = 0.032) in ODI and PCS scores, respectively. Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference for both ODI and PCS was also reduced for patients reporting PTSD symptoms (P = 0.009 and P = 0.001, respectively). A preoperative psychiatric diagnosis correlated only with final ODI score (P = 0.008). Preoperative mental composite scores were significantly correlated with final ODI and PCS scores, as well as final change from preoperative and likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference for PCS, but not for ODI scores. CONCLUSION: Postoperative psychological distress was strongly correlated with reduced clinical benefit among patients who underwent elective lumbar arthrodesis, and seemed to be a stronger predictor of reduced clinical benefit than either major psychiatric diagnosis or preoperative mental composite scores. Efforts to reduce postoperative psychological distress may offer an opportunity to enhance patient reported clinical outcomes from elective spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disability Evaluation , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Period , Preoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/methods , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 38(4): E211-6, 2013 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23197017

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the diagnostic value of prevertebral soft-tissue swelling in the setting of cervical spine trauma. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In adult patients with trauma, an increase in the thickness of the retropharyngeal soft tissues is commonly used as a potential indicator of occult injury, but no studies have examined this parameter using computed tomography (CT) as a screening modality. METHODS: A total of 541 patients with trauma with injuries at any level of the spine underwent CT. Patients with cervical injury were divided into those requiring noninvasive (observation or cervical collar, n = 142) management, and those requiring invasive (surgery or halo, n = 61) treatment. A control group of patients with isolated thoracic or lumbar injuries was used for comparison (n = 542). Retropharyngeal soft tissues were measured at the cranial and caudal endplates of all cervical levels on sagittal and axial CT. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for +1, +2, and +3 standard deviations from mean values. RESULTS: Sensitivity for detection of injury was found to be universally poor for all measurement groups. This ranged from 14.4% to 21.2% at +1 SD to 5.3% to 8.7% at +2 SD. Positive and negative predictive values for injury were also universally poor, ranging from 38% to 75%. Soft-tissue swelling as a sentinel sign of cervical spine injury demonstrates consistently high specificity and low sensitivity, precisely the opposite of what would be desired in a screening test. This study shows at best a sensitivity of 21.6% when using this parameter for the detection of these injuries in adult patients with trauma. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the results of this study, we recommend against the routine use of measurement of the prevertebral soft tissues on CT as a screening tool for cervical spine injury in adult patients with trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Soft Tissue Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Young Adult
9.
Am J Ind Med ; 51(9): 656-67, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18609549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the mortality experience of 6,157 chemical laboratory workers employed at United States Department of Energy facilities. METHODS: All cause, all cancer and cause-specific standardized mortality ratios were calculated. Cox regression analyses were conducted to further evaluate the relation between chemical exposure and mortality risk due to selected cancers. RESULTS: The mortality due to all causes combined and all cancers combined were below expectation for the cohort. There were no statistically significant elevations reported among males for any specific cancer or non-cancer outcome. There no statistically significant elevations among females for any specific non-cancer and most specific cancers; however, multiple myeloma deaths were significantly elevated (SMR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.43-7.33; number of observed deaths, n = 7). Statistically significant elevations were seen among workers employed 20+ years for leukemia using both 2- and 5-year lag periods. Also, a statistically significant positive trend of elevated lung cancer mortality with increasing employment duration was seen using both 5- and 10-year lags. A similar trend was seen for smoking related cancers among men. CONCLUSION: While lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer mortality was below expectation, a significant elevation of multiple myeloma deaths among females and an elevation of leukemia among workers employed 20+ years (possibly due to radiation and benzene exposure) were observed. A NIOSH case-control study is underway to examine more closely the relation between multiple myeloma and a variety of chemical exposures among workers employed at the Oak Ridge K-25 facility.


Subject(s)
Chemical Industry/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/mortality , Occupational Diseases/mortality , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Power Plants/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cohort Studies , Employment , Female , Government Agencies , Humans , Male , Mortality , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Tennessee , Uranium/adverse effects
10.
Gene ; 414(1-2): 41-8, 2008 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18378408

ABSTRACT

DNA sequencing of the region directly downstream of the Anaplasma phagocytophilum (strain MRK) 16S rRNA gene identified homologues of sdhC and sdhD; however, further sequencing by gene walking failed to identify additional sdh gene homologues. The sequence downstream of sdhD identified a partial gene, pep1, predicted to encode a protein >35.3 kDa with 26.3% identity to a hypothetical Ehrlichia canis protein with no known function. The recently completed sequence of the A. phagocytophilum genome confirmed our findings and indicated that the sdhA and sdhB genes are duplicated in a tandem orientation, and located distant from the sdhC and sdhD genes. The expression of the A. phagocytophilum 16S rRNA, sdhC, and sdhD genes was examined by reverse transcriptase PCR which showed that these three genes are expressed as an operon. The pep1 gene was expressed independent of the 16S-sdhCD operon from a promoter between sdhD and pep1. Further analysis of the sdhA and sdhB genes suggested the tandem duplication of the genes in conserved and may be unique to the species A. phagocytophilum. While the conservation of the A. phagocytophilum Sdh proteins, including the residues required for heme- and quinone-binding by SdhC and SdhD, suggests these subunits form an active enzymatic complex, the unusual genomic arrangement and expression pattern of these genes support previous studies (rRNA, ftsZ) indicating that gene rearrangement and operon fragmentation are common in the genomes of Anaplasma and other obligate intracellular bacteria. OMB DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC or the Department of Health and Human Services.


Subject(s)
Anaplasma phagocytophilum/genetics , Gene Rearrangement , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , Succinate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Amino Acid Sequence , Anaplasma phagocytophilum/enzymology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Flavoproteins/genetics , Flavoproteins/metabolism , Genes, rRNA/physiology , Molecular Sequence Data , Operon , Phylogeny , RNA, Bacterial/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/physiology , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Succinate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 18(10): 1077-93, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17694421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is generally considered to be non-radiogenic and is excluded from several programs that compensate workers for illnesses resulting from occupational exposures. Questions about whether this exclusion is justified prompted a Congressional mandate to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to, further, examine the radiogenicity of CLL. This study revisits the question of CLL radiogenicity by examining epidemiologic evidence from occupationally and medically-exposed populations. METHODS: A systematic review of radiation-exposed cohorts was conducted to investigate the association between radiation and CLL. Exploratory power calculations for a pooled occupational study were performed to examine the feasibility of assessing CLL radiogenicity epidemiologically. RESULTS: There is a bias against reporting CLL results, because of the disease's presumed non-radiogenicity. In medical cohort studies that provide risk estimates for CLL, risk is elevated, though non-significantly, in almost all studies with more than 15 years average follow-up. The results of occupational studies are less consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Studies with adequate follow-up time and power are needed to better understand CLL radiogenicity. Power analyses show that a pooled study might detect risk on the order of radiation induced non-CLL leukemia, but is unlikely to detect smaller risks.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/epidemiology , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , United States
12.
Pediatrics ; 120(2): e401-9, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17646354

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The goals were (1) to compare pediatricians' heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine shortage experience and adherence to shortage recommendations during 2 heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine shortages, (2) to assess factors associated with nonadherence to second shortage recommendations, and (3) to assess opinions about national immunization policy during vaccine shortages. METHODS: We mailed surveys to all pediatrician immunization providers in the greater Cincinnati, Ohio, metropolitan area. We assessed heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine supply and immunization practices during the shortages and provider attitudes regarding immunization shortage policy. RESULTS: The response rate was 61% (171 of 282 providers). Most pediatricians experienced heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine shortages (first shortage: 86%; second shortage: 84%). The rate of adherence to recommendations to defer the fourth heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine dose for healthy children was significantly higher during the second shortage, compared with the first shortage (first shortage: 62%; second shortage: 89%). Adherence to recommendations to administer the fourth dose to high-risk children remained unchanged (first shortage: 43%; second shortage: 45%). Controlling for other factors, pediatricians who reported a severe second shortage had greater odds of not fully vaccinating high-risk children, compared with those who reported no shortage. Contrary to recommendations, many pediatricians did not maintain tracking systems during the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine shortages (first shortage: 37%; second shortage: 46%). Most pediatricians (91%) thought that national vaccine shortage recommendations were needed to protect them from liability. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of adherence to recommendations to defer heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine doses for healthy children increased significantly from the first shortage to the second shortage. The nonadherent practice of deferring the fourth dose for high-risk children was associated with more severe shortages and, potentially, an inability to vaccinate.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/standards , Health Care Rationing/standards , Meningococcal Vaccines/standards , Physicians/standards , Pneumococcal Vaccines/standards , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Rationing/methods , Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Male , United States , Vaccines, Conjugate/standards
13.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 11(10): 1604-6, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16318705

ABSTRACT

We examined the reservoir potential of white-tailed deer for Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Results suggest that white-tailed deer harbor a variant strain not associated with human infection, but contrary to published reports, white-tailed deer are not a reservoir for strains that cause human disease. These results will affect surveillance studies of vector and reservoir populations.


Subject(s)
Anaplasma phagocytophilum/isolation & purification , Deer/microbiology , Disease Reservoirs/microbiology , Ehrlichiosis/veterinary , Anaplasma phagocytophilum/classification , Animals , Ehrlichiosis/microbiology , Humans , Ixodes/microbiology , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...