Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Ann Oncol ; 23(2): 472-9, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21597096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Until recently, population-based data of cancer survival in Germany mostly relied on one registry covering ∼1 million people (1.3% of the German population). Here, we provide up-to-date cancer survival estimates for Germany based on data from 11 population-based cancer registries, covering 33 million people and compare them to survival estimates from the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer patients diagnosed in 1997-2006 were included. Period analysis was employed to calculate 5-year relative survival for 38 cancers for 2002-2006. German and USA survival rates were compared utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results 13 database. RESULTS: Five-year relative survival >80% was observed for testicular cancer (93.5%), skin melanoma (89.4%), cancers of the prostate (89.1%) and thyroid (87.8%), Hodgkin's lymphoma (84.5%) and cancers of the breast (83.7%) and endometrium (81.0%), which together account for almost 40% of cases. For the majority of cancers, German survival estimates were close to or below those in the United States. Exceptions with higher survival in Germany were cancers of the stomach, pancreas and kidney and Hodgkin's lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: German cancer survival estimates are mostly higher than the 2000-2002 pan-European estimates. Further research is needed to investigate causes responsible for differences between German and USA cancer survival rates.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany/epidemiology , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/mortality , SEER Program , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
2.
Br J Cancer ; 101(10): 1792-7, 2009 Nov 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19826425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterise the familial association of pancreatic cancer with other malignancies. METHODS: Relative risks (RRs) of pancreatic cancer according to family history of cancer were calculated using the updated Swedish Family-Cancer Database, which includes over 11.5 million individuals. Estimates were based on Poisson regression. RRs of tumours for individuals with a parental history of pancreatic cancer were also estimated. RESULTS: The risk of pancreatic cancer was elevated in individuals with a parental history of cancers of the liver (RR 1.41; 95% CI 1.10-1.81), kidney (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.06-1.76), lung (RR 1.50; 95% CI 1.27-1.79) and larynx (RR 1.98; 95% CI 1.19-3.28). Associations were also found between parental history of pancreatic cancer and cancers of the small intestine, colon, breast, lung, testis and cervix in offspring. There was an increased risk of pancreatic cancer associated with early-onset breast cancer in siblings. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic cancer aggregates in families with several types of cancer. Smoking may contribute to the familial aggregation of pancreatic and lung tumours, and the familial clustering of pancreatic and breast cancer could be partially explained by inherited mutations in the BRCA2 gene.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Aged , Family Health , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sweden/epidemiology
3.
Ann Oncol ; 20(5): 950-4, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19150948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Carcinoid tumours are neuroendocrine neoplasms mainly located in the gastrointestinal tract and bronchopulmonary system. Our study's aim was to characterise the familial nature of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours using the Swedish Family-Cancer Database, which includes >11.5 million individuals. METHODS: Familial relative risks (RRs) of carcinoid tumours were estimated for individuals with family history of invasive cancers. RRs of invasive cancers for the offspring of patients with carcinoid tumours were calculated as well. RRs were based on Poisson regression. RESULTS: The risk of carcinoid tumours was significantly increased among individuals with a parental history of carcinoid tumours (RR 4.33). An association was also found between carcinoid tumours in the offspring and parental invasive cancers of the brain, breast, liver, endocrine glands and urinary organs. In addition, parental invasive cancers of the kidney as well as squamous cell skin cancer associated with small intestinal carcinoids in the offspring. The risk of carcinoid tumours was elevated among those whose siblings were affected by colon and rectal cancers. CONCLUSION: The results describe the familial aggregation of carcinoid tumours with other noncarcinoid malignancies. Carcinoid tumours are rare and translating these results into screening programmes needs more research; however, gene finding studies should be stimulated.


Subject(s)
Carcinoid Tumor/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinoid Tumor/epidemiology , Databases as Topic , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Pedigree , Poisson Distribution , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sweden/epidemiology
4.
Br J Cancer ; 98(5): 997-1000, 2008 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18283306

ABSTRACT

Using the Swedish Family-Cancer Database covering over 11.5 million individuals, estimated relative risks (RRs) for colorectal adenoma were using Poisson's regression. The RR of colorectal adenoma was found to be increased among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer (2.72; 95% confidence interval=2.46-3.00) and among the offspring and siblings of patients with endometrial and prostate cancers. We also found an increased risk of colorectal adenoma for the offspring of individuals with stomach cancer and leukaemia, and for siblings of those with pancreatic cancer and multiple myeloma. Our results suggest that colorectal adenoma may share a genetic aetiology with cancer even at extracolorectal sites. Increases of colorectal adenoma in families affected by prostate cancer and acute leukaemia cannot be attributed to known cancer syndromes, although the play of chance cannot be excluded.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poisson Distribution , Risk Factors , Sweden
5.
Psychol Med ; 32(6): 959-76, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12214795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A 10-question screening scale of psychological distress and a six-question short-form scale embedded within the 10-question scale were developed for the redesigned US National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). METHODS: Initial pilot questions were administered in a US national mail survey (N = 1401). A reduced set of questions was subsequently administered in a US national telephone survey (N = 1574). The 10-question and six-question scales, which we refer to as the K10 and K6, were constructed from the reduced set of questions based on Item Response Theory models. The scales were subsequently validated in a two-stage clinical reappraisal survey (N = 1000 telephone screening interviews in the first stage followed by N = 153 face-to-face clinical interviews in the second stage that oversampled first-stage respondents who screened positive for emotional problems) in a local convenience sample. The second-stage sample was administered the screening scales along with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). The K6 was subsequently included in the 1997 (N = 36116) and 1998 (N = 32440) US National Health Interview Survey, while the K10 was included in the 1997 (N = 10641) Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. RESULTS: Both the K10 and K6 have good precision in the 90th-99th percentile range of the population distribution (standard errors of standardized scores in the range 0.20-0.25) as well as consistent psychometric properties across major sociodemographic subsamples. The scales strongly discriminate between community cases and non-cases of DSM-IV/SCID disorders, with areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.87-0.88 for disorders having Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores of 0-70 and 0.95-0.96 for disorders having GAF scores of 0-50. CONCLUSIONS: The brevity, strong psychometric properties, and ability to discriminate DSM-IV cases from non-cases make the K10 and K6 attractive for use in general-purpose health surveys. The scales are already being used in annual government health surveys in the US and Canada as well as in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Routine inclusion of either the K10 or K6 in clinical studies would create an important, and heretofore missing, crosswalk between community and clinical epidemiology.


Subject(s)
Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Prevalence , Psychometrics , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , United States/epidemiology
6.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(9): 810-6, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11545662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of smoking in the United States has been closely monitored. However, little is known about the epidemiology of nicotine dependence. We studied DSM-III-R nicotine dependence in the United States, trends across cohorts, and the role of nicotine dependence in smoking persistence. METHODS: The Tobacco Supplement to the National Comorbidity Survey was administered to a representative subset of 4414 persons aged 15 to 54 years. The World Health Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview was used to assess nicotine dependence. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence of nicotine dependence was 24%, nearly half of those who had ever smoked daily for a month or more. The highest risk for nicotine dependence occurred in the first 16 years after daily smoking began, at which point the rate declined and continued at a slower pace for several years. Nicotine dependence increased the risk of smoking persistence, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-3.0). Members of the most recent cohort, who were 15 to 24 years of age at the time of the survey, were the least likely to smoke daily, but those who smoked had the highest risk of dependence: OR for daily smoking in the most recent vs earliest cohort was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-0.9), and for dependence among smokers, 7.2 (95% CI, 5.0-10.4). CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence that nicotine dependence is the leading preventable cause of death and morbidity, it remains a common psychiatric disorder. Smoking cessation and the decline in uptake in recent years varied across subgroups of the population.


Subject(s)
Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Sampling Studies , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Smoking/trends , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
7.
Eur Psychiatry ; 15(1): 29-37, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10713800

ABSTRACT

Previous analysis of data from the U.S. National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) [24] suggested that the lifetime prevalence of social phobia in the community has increased significantly in recent cohorts. Furthermore, a latent class analysis of NCS data [21] revealed two primary classes of persons with social phobia: those with exclusive speaking fears and those with one or more other social-evaluative fears. Social phobia in the other social fear group is more persistent, more impairing, and more highly co-morbid with other DSM-III-R disorders. The current report presents data on whether the cohort effect is a general aspect of social phobia or is specific to one of the NCS social phobia subtypes, and whether the cohort effect varies as a function of socio-demographic characteristics. Data were drawn from the NCS. Social phobia was assessed with a revised version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Retrospective age of onset reports were used to estimate Kaplan-Meier survival curves for first onset of social phobia in each cohort represented in the survey. Comparison of these curves allowed us to make synthetic estimates based on retrospective reports of intercohort trends in lifetime prevalence. The lifetime prevalence of social phobia appears to have increased in recent cohorts. However, this increase does not exist among social phobics with exclusive fears of speaking. The increase is most pronounced among white, educated, and married persons, and it is not explained by increased co-morbidity with other mental disorders. The fact that the cohort effect is more pronounced for social phobia with one or more non-speaking fears is important in that this is generally a more severe form of the disorder with an earlier age of onset than social phobia with pure speaking fears. The fact that the cohort effect is most pronounced among people with social and economic advantage (i.e., white, married, well-educated) is intriguing and raises questions about the etiologic process that warrant further study in future research.


Subject(s)
Fear/classification , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Phobic Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Phobic Disorders/classification , Prevalence , Speech , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...