Effect of impression holding time and tray removal speed on the dimensional accuracy of impressions for artificial abutment tooth inclined.

Oral scanners allow dental impressions to be taken in a short time without the use of an impression material. However, it has been noted that high impression accuracy cannot be obtained in cases where the abutment is inclined or in cases where the span is long. Consequently, in daily clinical practice, impressions are often created using silicone impression material. When taking an impression using silicone impression material, the curing time or the removal time of the impression material are often based on the intuition of the dental staff. This study investigated the effects of impression holding time and impression tray removal speed on the dimensional accuracy of impressions. A specimen with an abutment inclined 30° to the removal direction of an impression was prepared. Four types of silicone rubber impression materials were used. Impressions were taken with two levels of holding time and two levels of removal speed using an autograph. The diameter of stone models was measured at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the baseline of each. The height of the inclined and opposite sides was also measured. Two-way analysis of variance was used to analyze data regarding the assessment of the effects of holding time and tray removal speed. The reproducibility of the impressions was affected by the volume of undercut caused by the inclined abutment. For a large undercut, longer holding times and faster tray removal speeds are recommended to reduce the deformation of silicone rubber impressions.

[Comparison of three testing methods of fracture toughness using indirect composite].

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the adaptability of fracture toughness evaluation and the relationship between three testing methods: single-edge notched beam fracture toughness test (SENB), indentation fracture toughness test (IF), and notchless triangular prism fracture toughness test (NTP). METHODS: Two types of indirect composite, Ceramage and Estenia C&B, were used. Four types of experimental specimens were prepared under two curing conditions for each composite resin. One curing condition was only light curing and the other was heat curing after light curing. The fracture toughness value (K(Ic)) of the experimental specimens was measured by each of the three fracture toughness tests. K(Ic) of each test was compared by ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test for the adaptability of fracture toughness evaluation. Then the correlation of two tests was evaluated by a simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Evaluation of the load-strain curve (or load-deflection curve) and fracture surface observation of SEM suggested the plane strain fracture phenomenon. K(Ic) values obtained by the three testing methods were significantly different (p<0.01). SENB could separate significantly these experimental specimens into four groups. IF could separate them into two groups. NTP could separate them into three groups. The fracture toughness evaluation of NTP was almost the same as that of SENB. The relationship between SENB and NTP showed a significant correlation (R(2)=99.7%) and its equation was NTP (K(Ic))=0.82 SENB(K(Ic))+1.05. IF did not show a significant correlation. CONCLUSION: These indirect composites tested exhibited different fracture toughnesses. This difference occurred due to the contents and curing conditions. The adaptability of fracture toughness evaluation showed different values depending on the testing method. The relationship of SENB and NTP showed a significant correlation.