Nonsinusoidalin situelectric field caused by magnetic deactivator device for EAS labels-assessment of field strength inside a detailed anatomical hand model.

In order to evaluate the localised magnetic field (MF) exposure of the cashier's hand due to a particular demagnetization device (deactivator) for single-use labels of an acoustomagnetic (AM) electronic article surveillance (EAS) system, comprehensive measurements of the MF near the surface of the deactivator, and numerical computations of the induced electric field strengthEi, were performed in high-resolution anatomical hand models of different postures and positions with respect to the deactivator. The measurement results for magnetic inductionBwere assessed with respect to the action levels (AL) for limb exposure, and the computational results forEiwere evaluated with respect to the exposure limit values (ELV) for health effects according to European Union (EU) directive 2013/35/EU. For the ELV-based assessment, a maximum of the 2 × 2 × 2 mm3averagedEi(maxEi,avg) and the respective 99.9th, 99.5th, and 99.0th percentiles were used. As the MF impulse emitted by the deactivator for demagnetization of the AM-EAS labels was highly nonsinusoidal, measurement results were assessed based on the weighted peak method in the time domain (WPM-TD). A newly developed scaling technique was proposed to also apply the WPM-TD to the assessment of the (nonsinusoidal)Eiregarding the ELV. It was used to calculate the resulting WPM-TD-based exposure index (EI) from frequency domain computations. The assessment regarding the AL for limbs yielded peak values of magnetic induction of up to 97 mT (measured with a 3 cm2MF probe on top of the deactivator surface) corresponding to an EI of 443%. However, this was considered an overestimation of the actual exposure in terms ofEias the AL were intentionally defined conservatively. A WPM-TD-based assessment ofEifinally led to the worst case EI of up to 135%, 93%, 78%, and 72% when using the maxEi,avg, 99.9th, 99.5th, and 99.0th percentiles, respectively.

Design and Dosimetric Characterization of a Broadband Exposure Facility for In Vitro Experiments in the Frequency Range 18-40.5 GHz.

A novel exposure facility for exposing cell monolayers to centimeter and millimeter waves (18-40.5 GHz) used by future 5G mobile communication technology and similar applications has been developed. A detailed dosimetric characterization of the apparatus for frequencies of 27 and 40.5 GHz and 60 mm petri dishes, used in a presently ongoing study on human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes, was carried out. The exposure facility enables a well-defined, randomized, and blinded application of sham exposure and exposure with selectable values of incident power flux density, and additionally provides the possibility of continuous monitoring of the sample temperature during exposure while it does not require significant deviations from routine in vitro handling procedures, i.e. petri dishes are not required to be placed inside waveguides or TEM cells. Mean specific absorption rate (SAR) values inside the cell monolayer of 115 W/kg (27 GHz) and 160 W/kg (40.5 GHz) per watt antenna input power and corresponding transmitted power density (St ) values at the bottom of the cell monolayer of 65 W/m2 (27 GHz) and 70 W/m2 (40.5 GHz) per watt antenna input power can be achieved, respectively. For reasonable amounts of harvested cells (80% of petri dish bottom area), the variation (max/min) of SAR and St over the cell monolayer remains below 3.7 dB (27 GHz) and 3.0 dB (40.5 GHz), respectively. © 2021 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Effects of 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure on sleep-dependent memory consolidation.

Studies have reported that exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) emitted by mobile telephony might affect specific sleep features. Possible effects of RF-EMF emitted by Wi-Fi networks on sleep-dependent memory consolidation processes have not been investigated so far. The present study explored the impact of an all-night Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz) exposure on sleep-dependent memory consolidation and its associated physiological correlates. Thirty young males (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 24.1 ± 2.9 years) participated in this double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled crossover study. Participants spent five nights in the laboratory. The first night was an adaptation/screening night. The second and fourth nights were baseline nights, each followed consecutively by an experimental night with either Wi-Fi (maximum: psSAR10g = <25 mW/kg; 6 min average: <6.4 mW/kg) or sham exposure. Declarative, emotional and procedural memory performances were measured using a word pair, a sequential finger tapping and a face recognition task, respectively. Furthermore, learning-associated brain activity parameters (power spectra for slow oscillations and in the spindle frequency range) were analysed. Although emotional and procedural memory were not affected by RF-EMF exposure, overnight improvement in the declarative task was significantly better in the Wi-Fi condition. However, none of the post-learning sleep-specific parameters was affected by exposure. Thus, the significant effect of Wi-Fi exposure on declarative memory observed at the behavioural level was not supported by results at the physiological level. Due to these inconsistencies, this result could also be a random finding.

Spending the night next to a router - Results from the first human experimental study investigating the impact of Wi-Fi exposure on sleep.

BACKGROUND: The use of wireless telecommunication systems such as wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi)-enabled devices has steadily increased in recent years. There are persistent concerns that radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure might affect health. Possible effects of RF-EMF exposure on human sleep were examined with regard to mobile phones and base stations, but not with regard to Wi-Fi exposure. OBJECTIVES: The present double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, fully counterbalanced cross-over study addressed for the first time the question whether a whole night Wi-Fi exposure has an effect on sleep. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy young male subjects (mean ± SD: 24.1 ± 2.9 years) spent five nights in the sleep laboratory. A screening and adaptation night was followed by two experimental nights. Each of the experimental nights was preceded by a baseline night. Sleep was evaluated at the subjective level by a questionnaire and at the objective level (macro- and microstructure) by polysomnography. Either 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi (max psSAR10g of 6.4 mW/kg) or sham signals were delivered by a newly developed head exposure facility. RESULTS: Results showed no statistically significant acute effects of a whole-night Wi-Fi exposure on subjective sleep parameters as well as on parameters characterizing the macrostructure of sleep. Analyses of the microstructure of sleep revealed a reduction in global EEG power in the alpha frequency band (8.00-11.75 Hz) during NREM sleep under acute Wi-Fi exposure compared to sham. DISCUSSION: The results of the present human experimental study are well in line with several other neurophysiological studies showing that acute RF-EMF exposure has no effect on the macrostructure of sleep. The slight physiological changes in EEG power observed under Wi-Fi exposure are neither reflected in the subjective assessment of sleep nor at the level of objective measurements. The present results are not indicative of a sleep disturbing effect of Wi-Fi exposure.

Design and Dosimetric Analysis of an Exposure Facility for Investigating Possible Effects of 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi Signals on Human Sleep.

A new head exposure system for double-blind provocation studies investigating possible effects of 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi exposure on human sleep was developed and dosimetrically analyzed. The exposure system includes six simultaneously radiating directional antennas arranged along a circle (radius 0.6 m) around the test subject's head, and enables a virtually uniform head exposure, i.e. without any preferred direction of incidence, during sleep. The system is fully computer-controlled and applies a real wireless local area network (WLAN) signal representing different transmission patterns as expected in real WLAN scenarios, i.e. phases of "beacon only" as well as phases of different data transmission rates. Sham and verum are applied in a double-blind crossover study design and all relevant exposure data, i.e. forward and reverse power at all six antenna inputs, are continuously recorded for quality control. For a total antenna input power (sum of all antennas) of 220 mW, typical specific absorption rate (SAR) in cortical brain regions is approximately 1-2 mW/kg (mass average SAR over respective brain region), which can be seen as a realistic worst-case exposure level in real WLAN scenarios. Taking into account variations of head positions during the experiments, the resulting exposure of different brain regions may deviate from the given average SAR levels up to 10 dB. Peak spatial 10 g average SAR in all brain and all head tissues is between 1.5-3.5 and 10.4-25 mW/kg, respectively. Bioelectromagnetics. © 2020 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Dosimetric issues with simplified homogeneous body models in low frequency magnetic field exposure assessment.

A simplified procedure, using circular disk models with homogeneous electric conductivity as representations for different body parts, has been proposed recently by product standard IEC 62822-3 for the assessment of magnetic field exposure in proximity to current-carrying conductors of welding equipment. Based on such simplified models, worst case coupling coefficients CCEi(I), i.e. maximum induced electric field strength, normalised for current and frequency, for body parts at different distances d to straight single and double wire arrangements, as well as rectangular loop-shaped current paths are tabulated in the standard. In this work we compared CCEi(I) values obtained by numerical computations with detailed anatomical models of the hand/forearm with the corresponding values given in IEC 62822-3 for current-carrying single wire conductors along the forearm at distances d = 30, 50 and 100 mm, respectively. Our results clearly indicated that the CCEi(I) given in the standard may substantially underestimate the actual exposure. Using average values for tissue conductivities the observed extent of underestimation was up to 8.9 dB (factor 2.79) and may be even higher for worst case combinations of tissue conductivities. The reasons for this substantial underestimation are the oversimplified geometry, i.e. the circular disk does not reflect anatomical constrictions of the induction area present in realistic hand/forearm geometries, as well as the missing conductivity contrast between different tissues in the homogeneous disk models. Results of exposure assessment and corresponding minimum distances to components of welding equipment obtained by the simplified disk model approach suggested by IEC 62822-3 should therefore be considered with caution.

Benchmark of different assessment methods for non-sinusoidal magnetic field exposure in the context of European Directive 2013/35/EU.

For the assessment of non-sinusoidal magnetic fields the European EMF Directive 2013/35/EU specified the Weighted Peak Method in Time Domain (WPM-TD) as the reference method. However, also other scientifically validated methods are allowed, provided that they lead to approximately equivalent and comparable results. In the non-binding guide for practical implementation of 2013/35/EU three methods alternative to the WPM-TD are described, i.e. the Weighted Peak Method in Frequency Domain (WPM-FD), the Multiple Frequency Rule (MFR), and an alternative Time Domain Assessment Method (TDAM). In this paper the results of a benchmark comparison of these assessment methods, based on 12 different time domain signals of magnetic induction, measured close to real devices and nine additional generic waveforms, are presented. The results demonstrated that assessments obtained with WPM-TD and WPM-FD can be considered approximately equivalent (maximum deviation 3.4 dB). The MFR systematically overestimates exposure, due to its inherently conservative definitions. In contrast, the TDAM significantly and systematically underestimates exposure up to a factor of 22 (26.8 dB) for the considered waveforms. The main reasons for this exposure underestimation by the TDAM are the introduction of an inappropriate time averaging, and the fact that the characteristic time parameter τ p,min, describing the minimum duration of all field changes dB/dt of the waveform is derived independently from the extent of the field change in the definitions of the TDAM. Consequently, we recommend not to use the TDAM as presently published in the non-binding guide to 2013/35/EU, as its application would be in contradiction with the underlying aim of 2013/35/EU, i.e. a harmonised level of occupational safety with respect to exposure to electromagnetic fields.

Systematic Numerical Analysis of Magnetic Field Partial Body Exposure and Comparison With Occupational Exposure Limit Values According to European Directive 2013/35/EU.

According to European Directive 2013/35/EU, exposure limit values for protection against sensory and health effects are met if external electric or magnetic fields are below corresponding low and high action levels for head, trunk and limb exposure, respectively. In order to verify this assumption even for more realistic exposure situations deviating from strictly uniform fields, systematic numerical computations using anatomical body models exposed to worst-case magnetic field gradients in different body regions are conducted. Applying magnetic fields according to low action level to the head and high action level to trunk and limbs at the same time results in slightly increased in situ electric field strengths in central nervous system tissues, compared to uniform exposure at the low action level. The extent of this increase depends on field orientation, field gradient (slope from low to high action level), and relative position between body region and field gradient. While this increase does not lead to conflicts with the exposure limit values for frequencies of 50 Hz and higher, violation of corresponding exposure limit values could be observed at 16.67 Hz.

Inconsistency of a recently proposed method for assessing magnetic field exposure for protection against peripheral nerve stimulation in occupational situations.

A non-binding guide to practical implementation of European Directive 2013/35/EU concerning the limitation of occupational exposure against electromagnetic fields has been published recently. With regard to exposure assessment this guide proposes practically applicable assessment methods for non-uniform and non-sinusoidal environmental electric and magnetic fields, respectively. For non-sinusoidal magnetic fields in the low frequency range this guide proposes a time domain assessment (TDA) method, claimed to reduce the overestimation of exposure inherent to other assessment methods while being based on fundamental physiological principles regarding nerve stimulation. In the present paper we demonstrate that the proposed TDA method is not consistent with the obvious underlying principles of directive 2013/35/EU. Based on practically relevant waveforms and general considerations it can be shown that external magnetic fields may be deemed compliant by the TDA method although the underlying exposure limit values defined in 2013/35/EU may be exceeded. We therefore strongly recommend that the TDA method is removed from the guide for implementing 2013/35/EU as soon as possible.

On the importance of body posture and skin modelling with respect to in situ electric field strengths in magnetic field exposure scenarios.

The reference levels and maximum permissible exposure values for magnetic fields that are currently used have been derived from basic restrictions under the assumption of upright standing body models in a standard posture, i.e. with arms laterally down and without contact with metallic objects. Moreover, if anatomical modelling of the body was used at all, the skin was represented as a single homogeneous tissue layer. In the present paper we addressed the possible impacts of posture and skin modelling in scenarios of exposure to a 50 Hz uniform magnetic field on the in situ electric field strength in peripheral tissues, which must be limited in order to avoid peripheral nerve stimulation. We considered different body postures including situations where body parts form large induction loops (e.g. clasped hands) with skin-to-skin and skin-to-metal contact spots and compared the results obtained with a homogeneous single-layer skin model to results obtained with a more realistic two-layer skin representation consisting of a low-conductivity stratum corneum layer on top of a combined layer for the cellular epidermis and dermis. Our results clearly indicated that postures with loops formed of body parts may lead to substantially higher maximum values of induced in situ electric field strengths than in the case of standard postures due to a highly concentrated current density and in situ electric field strength in the skin-to-skin and skin-to-metal contact regions. With a homogeneous single-layer skin, as is used for even the most recent anatomical body models in exposure assessment, the in situ electric field strength may exceed the basic restrictions in such situations, even when the reference levels and maximum permissible exposure values are not exceeded. However, when using the more realistic two-layer skin model the obtained in situ electric field strengths were substantially lower and no violations of the basic restrictions occurred, which can be explained by the current-limiting effect of the low-conductivity stratum corneum layer.

Numerical analysis of specific absorption rate in the human head due to a 13.56 MHz RFID-based intra-ocular pressure measurement system.

A modern wireless intra-ocular pressure monitoring system, based on 13.56 MHz inductively coupled data transmission, was dosimetrically analyzed with respect to the specific absorption rate (SAR) induced inside the head and the eye due to the electromagnetic field exposure caused by the reader antenna of the transmission system. The analysis was based on numerical finite difference time domain computations using a high resolution anatomical eye model integrated in a modern commercially available anatomical model of a male head. Three different reader antenna configurations, a 7-turn elliptic (30 mm × 50 mm) antenna at 12 mm distance from the eye, a flexible circular antenna (60 mm diameter, 8 turns on 2 mm substrate) directly attached to the skin, and a circular 7-turn antenna (30 mm diameter at 12 mm distance to the eye) were analyzed, respectively. Possible influences of the eye-lid status (closed or opened) and the transponder antenna contained in a contact lens directly attached to the eye were taken into account. The results clearly demonstrated that for typical reader antenna currents required for proper data transmission, the SAR values remain far below the limits for localized exposure of the head, as defined by the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Particularly the induced SAR inside the eye was found to be substantially (orders of magnitudes for typical reader antenna currents in the order of 1 A turn) below values which have been reported to be critical with respect to thermally induced adverse health effects in eye tissues.